Corollary Discharge Provides the Sensory Content of Inner Speech

Psychological Science

Volumn 24, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1824-1830

  Scott, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

auditory perception; motor processes; speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PROCESSES; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; MOTOR PROCESSES; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883824358     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797613478614     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bertelson P.,Vroomen J.,de Gelder B.Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: A McGurk aftereffect.Psychological Science. 2003;14:592-597.
2. Blakemore S.-J.,Frith C. D.,Wolpert D. M.Spatio-temporal prediction modulates the perception of self-produced stimuli.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 1999;11:551-559.
3. Boersma P.,Weenink D.Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.Glot International. 2001;5:341-345.
4. Cullen K. E.Sensory signals during active versus passive movement.Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2004;14:698-706.
5. Eliades S. J.,Wang X.Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations.Journal of Neurophysiology. 2003;89:2194-2207.
6. Eliades S. J.,Wang X.Auditory signal processing: Physiology, psychoacoustics, and models. Pressnitzer D.de Cheveigné A.McAdams S.Collet L., ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2004:292-298.
7. Ford J. M.,Mathalon D. H.Corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia: Can it explain auditory hallucinations?.International Journal of Psychophysiology. 2005;58:179-189.
8. Fowler C. A.,Brown J. M.,Mann V. A.Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop-consonant identification by humans.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2000;26:877-888.
9. GreenleeJ. D. W.JacksonA. W.ChenF.LarsonC. R.OyaH.KawasakiHHowardM. A.III. (2011). Human auditory cortical activation during self-vocalization. PLoS ONE, 6(3), e14744. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0014744.
10. Grush R.The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception [Target article and commentaries].Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 2004;27:377-442.
11. Heinks-Maldonado T. H.,Nagarajan S. S.,Houde J. F.Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production.NeuroReport. 2006;17:1375-1379.
12. Hickok G.,Houde J.,Rong F.Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: Computational basis and neural organization.Neuron. 2011;69:407-422.
13. HoltL. L. (1999). Auditory constraints on speech perception: An examination of spectral contrast (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.
14. Holt L. L.Speech categorization in context: Joint effects of nonspeech and speech precursors.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2006;119:4016-4026.
15. Kaplan J. T.,Aziz-Zadeh L.,Uddin L. Q.,Iacoboni M.The self across the senses: An fMRI study of self-face and self-voice recognition.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 2008;3:218-223.
16. Kauramäki J.,Jääskeläinen I. P.,Hari R.,Möttönen R.,Rauschecker J. P.,Sams M.Lipreading and covert speech production similarly modulate human auditory-cortex responses to pure tones.Journal of Neuroscience. 2010;30:1314-1321.
17. Levelt W. J. M.Monitoring and self-repair in speech.Cognition. 1983;14:41-104.
18. Lotto A. J.,Sullivan S. C.,Holt L. L.Central locus for nonspeech context effects on phonetic identification [Letter to the editor].Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2003;113:53-56.
19. Mann V. A.Influence of preceding liquid on stop-consonant perception.Perception & Psychophysics. 1980;28:407-412.
20. Mathalon D. H.,Heinks-Maldonado T. H.,Ford J. M.,Gray M.Fine-tuning of auditory cortex during speech production.Psychophysiology. 2005;42:180-190.
21. Numminen J.,Curio G.Differential effects of overt, covert and replayed speech on vowel-evoked responses of the human auditory cortex.Neuroscience Letters. 1999;272:29-32.
22. Poulet J. F. A.,Hedwig B.A corollary discharge maintains auditory sensitivity during sound production.Nature. 2002;418:1-5.
23. Scott M.,Yeung H. H.,Gick B.,Werker J. F.Inner speech captures the perception of external speech.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Express Letters. 2013;133:286-293.
24. Shuster L. I.,Durrant J. D.Toward a better understanding of the perception of self-produced speech.Journal of Communication Disorders. 2003;36:1-11.
25. Suga N.,Schlegel P.,Pauly J. E.Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating bats.Science. 1972;177:82-84.
26. Sylvester R.,Haynes J.,Rees G.Saccades differentially modulate human LGN and V1 responses in the presence and absence of visual stimulation.Current Biology. 2005;15:37-41.
27. Tian X.,Poeppel D.Mental imagery of speech and movement implicates the dynamics of internal forward models.Frontiers in Psychology. 2010;1:1-23.
28. Tian X.,Poeppel D.Mental imagery of speech: Linking motor and perceptual systems through internal simulation and estimation.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2012;6:1-11.
29. Toyomura A.,Fujii T.,Kawabata Y.Loudness perception of vocalization through auditory feedback.Acoustical Science and Technology. 2009;30:439-441.
30. Viswanathan N.,Fowler C. A.,Magnuson J. S.A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2009;16:74-79.
31. VossM.IngramJ. N.WolpertD. M.HaggardP. (2008). Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e2866. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0002866.
32. Warren R. M.Auditory perception: An analysis and synthesis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2008:.
33. Wolpert D. M.,Ghahramani Z.Computational principles of movement neuroscience.Nature Neuroscience. 2000;3:1212-1217.