Mere expectation to move causes attenuation of sensory signals

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Voss, Martin ^a,b   Ingram, James N ^a,c   Wolpert, Daniel M ^a,c   Haggard, Patrick ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR SYSTEM; NEUROMODULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKIN STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; EFFERENT NERVE; FINGER; FUNCTIONS OF THE SKIN AND ITS APPENDAGES; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY NERVE;

ADULT; AFFERENT PATHWAYS; CUES; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SKIN PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 51449112372     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002866     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Angel RW, Malenka RC (1982) Velocity-dependent suppression of cutaneous sensitivity during movement. Exp Neurol. 77: 266-274.
2. Chapman CE, Bushnell MC, Miron D, Duncan GH, Lund JP (1987) Sensory perception during movement in man. Exp. Brain Res. 68: 516-524.
3. Bell CC (1981) An efference copy which is modified by reafferent input. Science 214: 450-453.
4. Cullen KE (2004) Sensory signals during active versus passive movement. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 14(6): 698-706.
5. Bays PM, Wolpert DM (2007) Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability. J Physiol. 15;578(Pt 2): 387-96.
6. Voss M, Ingram JN, Haggard P, Wolpert DM (2006) Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement. Nature Neuroscience 9: 26-27.
7. Haggard P, Whitford B (2004) Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 19(1): 52-8.
8. Walsh E, Haggard P (2007) The internal structure of stopping as revealed by a sensory detection task. Exp Brain Res. 183(3): 405-10.
9. Cohen LG, Starr A (1987) Localization, timing and specificity of gating of somatosensory evoked potentials during active movement in man. Brain 110 (Pt 2): 451-67.
10. Shimazu H, Kaji R, Murase N, Kohara N, Ikeda A, et al. (1999) Pre-movement gating of short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials. Neuroreport 10(12): 2457-60.
11. Wasaka T, Hoshiyama M, Nakata H, Nishihira Y, Kakigi R (2003) Gating of somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during the preparatory period of self-initiated finger movement. Neuroimage 20(3): 1830-8.
12. Williams SR, Chapman CE (2002) Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. III. Effect of motor tasks. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 1968-1979.
13. Chapman CE, Jiang W, Lamarre Y (1988) Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey. Exp Brain Res 72: 316-334.
14. Williams SR, Shenasa J, Chapman CE (1998) Time course and magnitude of movement-related gating of tactile detection in humans. I. Importance of stimulus location. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 947-963.
15. de Jong R, Gladwin TE, 't Hart BM (2006) Movement-related EEG-indices of preparation in task switching and motor control. Brain Res. 1105(1): 73-82.
16. Posner MI, Snyder CRR, Davidson JR (1980) Attention and the Detection of Signals. Journal of Experimantal Psychology: General 109: 160-174.
17. Macaluso E, Driver J (2005) Multisensory spatial interactions: a window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends Neurosci. 28(5): 264-71.
18. Kida T, Wasaka T, Nakata H, Akatsuka K, Kakigi R (2006) Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background. Exp Brain Res 175(4): 609-17.