Variation in the temporal and spatial use of signals and its implications for multimodal communication

Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Volumn 67, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1499-1511

  Uy, J Albert C ^a   Safran, Rebecca J ^b  

^a University of Miami   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Monarcha castaneiventris; Multimodal signals; Premating reproductive isolation; Sequential assessment; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

BIRD; COMMUNICATION; CONSPECIFIC; DIVERGENCE; HABITAT STRUCTURE; PLUMAGE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION; SIGNAL; SONG;

ANIMALIA; MONARCHA CASTANEIVENTRIS;

EID: 84883780038     PISSN: 03405443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-013-1492-y     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Baker MC (1991) Response to male indigo and lazuli buntings and their hybrids to song playback in allopatric and sympatric populations. Behaviour 119: 225-242.
3. Baker MC, Baker AEM (1990) Reproductive behavior of female buntings: isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44: 332-338.
4. Balakrishnan CN, Sorenson MD (2006) Song discrimination suggests premating isolation among sympatric indigo bird species and host races. Behav Ecol 17: 473-478.
5. Balkenius A, Dacke M (2010) Flight behaviour of the hawkmoth Manduca sexta towards unimodal and multimodal targets. J Exp Biol 213: 3741-3747.
6. Barraclough TG, Harvey PH, Nee S (1995) Sexual selection and taxonomic diversity in passerine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 259: 211-215.
7. Barry KL, Holwell GI, Herberstein ME (2008) Female praying mantids use sexual cannibalism as a foraging strategy to increase fecundity. Behav Ecol 19: 710-715.
8. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ (1998) Sexual selection in the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata: condition, sex traits and immune capacity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44: 179-191.
9. Borgia G (1995) Complex male display and female choice in the spotted bowerbird: specialized functions for different bower decorations. Anim Behav 49: 1291-1301.
10. Boughman JW (2001) Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411: 944-948.
11. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1998) Principles of animal communication. Sinauer, Sunderland.
12. Bro-Jørgensen J (2009) Dynamics of multiple signalling systems: animal communication in a world in flux. Trends Ecol Evol 292: 292-300.
13. Brookfield HC (1969) Some notes on the climate of the British Solomon Islands. Philos T Roy Soc B 255: 207-210.
14. Bureau of Meteorology (1975) Tropical cyclones in the Northern Australian regions 1971-1972. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory.
15. Candolin U (2003) The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol Rev 78: 575-595.
16. Candolin U, Reynolds JD (2001) Sexual signaling in the European bitterling: females learn the truth by direct inspection of the resource. Behav Ecol 12: 407-411.
17. Coleman SW, Patricelli GL, Borgia G (2004) Variable female preferences drive complex male displays. Nature 428: 742-745.
18. Coyne JA, Orr HA (1989) Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43: 362-381.
19. Diamond JM (2002) Dispersal, mimicry and geographic variation in Northern Melanesian birds. Pac Sci 56: 1-22.
20. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139: S125-S153.
21. Filardi CE (2003) Speciation and the biogeographic history of tropical pacific flycatchers (genus Monarcha). Dissertation. University of Washington, Seattle.
22. Filardi CE, Smith CE (2005) Molecular phylogenetics of monarch flycatchers (genus Monarcha) with emphasis on Solomon Island endemics. Molec Phyl Evol 37: 776-788.
23. Filardi CE, Smith CE (2008) Social selection and geographic variation in two monarch flycatchers from the Solomon Islands. Condor 110: 24-34.
24. Gibson JS, Uetz GW (2008) Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success. Anim Behav 75: 1253-1262.
25. Gibson R (1996) Female choice in sage grouse: the roles of attraction and active comparison. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 39: 55-59.
26. Goyret J, Kelber A, Pfaff M, Raguso RA (2009) Flexible responses to visual and olfactory stimuli by foraging Manduca sexta: larval nutrition affects adult behaviour. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 2739-2745.
27. Grafe TU, Preininger D, Sztatecsny M, Kasah R, Dehling JM, Proksch S, Hodl W (2012) Multimodal communication in a noisy environment: a case study of the Bornean rock frog Staurois parvus. PLoS One 7: e37965.
28. Grafe TU, Wagner TC (2007) Multimodal signaling in male and female foot-flagging frogs Staurois guttatus (Ranidae): an alerting function of calling. Ethology 113: 772-781.
29. Grant BR, Grant PR (2002a) Lack of premating isolation at the base of a phylogenetic tree. Am Nat 160: 1-19.
30. Grant BR, Grant PR (2002b) Simulating secondary contact in allopatric speciation: an empirical test of premating isolation. Biol J Linn Soc 76: 545-556.
31. Guilford T, Dawkins MS (1991) Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Anim Behav 42: 1-14.
32. Hankison SJ, Morris MR (2003) Avoiding a compromise between sexual selection and species recognition: female swordtail fish assess multiple species-specific cues. Behav Ecol 14: 282-287.
33. Hebets EA (2008) Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991. Behav Ecol 19: 1250-1257.
34. Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57: 197-214.
35. Hebets EA, Uetz GW (1999) Female responses to isolated signals from multimodal male courtship displays in the wolf spider genus Schizocosa (Araneae: Lycosidae). Anim Behav 57: 865-872.
36. Irwin DE, Bensch S, Price TD (2001) Speciation in a ring. Nature 409: 333-337.
37. Kaczorowski RL, Leonard AS, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2012) Floral signal complexity as a possible adaptation to environmental variability: a test using nectar-foraging bumblebees, Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 83: 905-913.
38. Kirkpatrick M, Ravigne V (2002) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. Am Nat 159: S22-S35.
39. Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S, Liu W (2001) Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Anim Behav 61: 1029-1033.
40. Kulahci IG, Dornhaus A, Papaj DR (2008) Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees. Proc R Soc Lond B 275: 797-802.
41. Lampe HM, Saetre G-P (1995) Female pied flycatchers prefer males with larger song repertoires. Proc R Soc Lond B 262: 163-167.
42. Lande R (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78: 3721-3725.
43. Lehtonen TK, Rintakoski S, Lindstrom K (2007) Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus. Behav Ecol 18: 696-700.
44. Leonard AS, Hedrick AV (2010) Long-distance signals influence assessment of close range mating displays in the field cricket, Gryllus integer. Biol J Linn Soc 100: 856-865.
45. Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
46. McDonald DB (1989) Correlates of male mating success in a lekking bird. Anim Behav 37: 1007-1022.
47. McGregor PK, Catchpole C, Dabelsteen T, Falls JB, Fusani L et al (1992) Design of playback experiments: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus. In: McGregor PK (ed) Playback and studies of animal communication. Plenum, New York, pp 1-9.
48. McLennan DA (2003) The importance of olfactory signals in the gasterosteid mating system: sticklebacks go multimodal. Biol J Linn Soc 80: 555-572.
49. Morton ES (1975) Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109: 17-34.
50. Partan S, Yelda S, Price V, Shimizu T (2005) Female pigeons, Columba livia, respond to multisensory audio/video playbacks of male courtship behaviour. Anim Behav 70: 957-966.
51. Partan SR, Marler P (2005) Issues in the classification of multimodal communication signals. Am Nat 166: 231-245.
52. Patricelli GL, Uy JAC, Borgia G (2003) Multiple male traits interact: attractive bower decorations facilitate attractive behavioural displays in satin bowerbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B 270: 2389-2395.
53. Persons MH, Fleishman LJ, Frye MA, Stimphil ME (1999) Sensory response patterns and the evolution of visual signal design in anoline lizards. J Comp Physiol A 184: 585-607.
54. Price T (2007) Speciation in birds. Roberts & Co, Greenwood Village.
55. Price TD, Bouvier MM (2002) The evolution of F-1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56: 2083-2089.
56. Rafferty NE, Boughman JW (2006) Olfactory mate recognition in a sympatric species pair of three-spined sticklebacks. Behav Ecol 17: 965-970.
57. Ramsey J, Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Components of reproductive isolation between the monkey flowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymacae). Evolution 57: 1520-1534.
58. Ratcliffe LM, Grant PR (1985) Species recognition in Darwin's finches (Geospiza, Gould). 3. Male responses to playback of different song types, dialects and heterospecific songs. Anim Behav 33: 290-307.
59. Ratti JT (1979) Reproductive separation and isolating mechanisms between sympatric dark- and light-phase Western Grebes. Auk 96: 573-586.
60. Read JL (2011) The last wild island: saving tetepare. Page Digital, Kensington Park.
61. Robson TE, Goldizen AW, Green DJ (2005) The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates? Biol Lett 1: 264-267.
62. Rosenthal GG, Rand AS, Ryan MJ (2004) The vocal sac as a visual cue in anuran communication: an experimental analysis using video playback. Anim Behav 68: 55-58.
63. Rybak F, Sureau G, Aubin T (2002) Functional coupling of acoustic and chemical signals in the courtship behaviour of the male Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 695-701.
64. Rypstra AL, Schlosser AM, Sutton PL, Persons MH (2009) Multmodal signalling: the relative importance of chemical and visual cues from females to the behaviour of male wolf spiders (Lycosidae). Anim Behav 77: 937-947.
65. Seddon N, Tobias JA (2007) Song divergence at the edge of Amazonia: an empirical test of the peripatric speciation model. Biol J Linn Soc 90: 173-188.
66. Stoffer B, Walker SE (2012) The use of multimodal communication in mate choice decisions by female house crickets, Acheta domesticus. Anim Behav 83: 1131-1138.
67. Tack EJ, Putland DA, Robson TE, Goldizen AW (2005) Geographic variation in vocalisations of Satin Bowerbirds, Ptilonorynchus violaceus, in south-eastern Queensland. Emu 105: 27-31.
68. Taylor RC, Buchanan BW, Doherty JL (2007) Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice. Anim Behav 74: 1753-1763.
69. Taylor RC, Klein BA, Stein J, Ryan MJ (2008) Faux frogs: multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour. Anim Behav 76: 1089-1097.
70. Uetz GW, Roberts JA, Taylor PW (2009) Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals. Anim Behav 78: 299-305.
71. Uy JAC, Moyle RG, Filardi CE (2009a) Plumage color and song differences mediate species recognition between incipient flycatcher species of the Solomon Islands. Evolution 63: 153-164.
72. Uy JAC, Moyle RG, Filardi CE, Cheviron ZA (2009b) Difference in plumage color used in species recognition between incipient species is linked to a single amino acid substitution in the melanocortin-1 receptor. Am Nat 174: 244-254.
73. West-Eberhard MJ (1983) Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q Rev Biol 58: 155-183.
74. Whitmore TC (1969) The vegetation of the Solomon Islands. Philos T Roy Soc B 255: 259-270.
75. Wilkins MR, Seddon N, Safran RJ (2012) Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences. Trends Ecol Evol. doi 10. 1016/j. tree. 2012. 10. 002.
76. Winn HE, Winn LK (1978) The song of the humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae in the West Indies. Mar Biol 47: 97-114.
77. Zuk M, Rebar D, Scott SP (2008) Courtship song is more variable than calling song in the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Anim Behav 76: 1065-1071.