Simulating secondary contact in allopatric speciation: An empirical test of premating isolation

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 545-556

  Grant, B Rosemary ^a   Grant, Peter R ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural evolution; Darwin's finches; Ecological divergence; Gal pagos; Imprinting; Playback experiments; Songs

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; IMPRINTING; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CANIS; FRINGILLIDAE; GEOSPIZA DIFFICILIS; GEOSPIZA FULIGINOSA;

EID: 0036694453     PISSN: 00244066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00076.x     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Baker AJ & Jenkins PF. 1987. Founder effect and cultural evolution of songs in an isolated population of chaffinches, Fringilla coelebs, in the Chatham Islands. Animal Behaviour 35: 1793-1803.
2. Baptista L. 1996. Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, eds. The ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Comstock, 39-60.
3. Bowman RI. 1983. The evolution of song in Darwin's Finches. In: Bowman RI, Berson M, Leviton AE, eds. Patterns of evolution in Galápagos organisms. San Francisco, CA: American Association for the Advancement of Science, Pacific Division, 237-537.
4. ten Cate C & Vos DR. 1999. Sexual imprinting and evolutionary processes in birds: a reassessment. Advances in the Study of Behaviour 28: 1-31.
5. Dabelsteen T & Pedersen SB. 1993. Song-based species dis-crimination and behaviour assessment by female blackbirds, Turdus merula. Animal Behaviour 45: 759-771.
6. Freed L, Conant S, Fleischer RC. 1987. Evolutionary ecology and radiation of Hawaiian passerine birds. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2: 196-203.
7. Gibbs HL. 1990. Cultural evolution of male song types in Darwin's medium ground finches, Geospiza fortis. Animal Behaviour 39: 253-263.
8. Grant PR, ed. 1998. Evolution on islands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Grant PR. 1999. Ecology and evolution of Darwin's finches. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Grant PR. 2001. Reconstructing the evolution of birds on islands: 100 years of research. Oikos 92: 385-403.
11. Grant BR & Grant PR. 1989. Evolutionary dynamics of a natural population. The large cactus finch of the Gálapagos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Grant PR & Grant BR. 1992. Hybridization in bird species. Science 256: 193-197.
13. Grant PR & Grant BR. 1995. The founding of a new population of Darwin's Finches. Evolution 49: 229-240.
14. Grant BR & Grant PR. 1996. Cultural inheritance of song and its role in the evolution of Darwin's finches. Evolution 50: 2471-2487.
15. Grant PR & Grant BR. 1997a. Hybridization, sexual imprinting and mate choice. American Naturalist 149: 1-28.
16. Grant PR & Grant BR. 1997b. Mating patterns of Darwin's Finch hybrids determined by song and morphology. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 317-343.
17. Grant BR & Grant PR. 1998. Hybridization and speciation in Darwin's Finches. The role of sexual imprinting on a culturally transmitted trait. In: Howard DJ, Berlocher SH, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. New York: Oxford University Press, 404-422.
18. Grant BR & Grant PR. 2002. Lack of premating isolation at the base of a phylogenetic tree. American Naturalist 160: 1-19.
19. Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K. 2000. The allopatric phase of speciation: the sharp-beaked ground finch (Geospiza difficilis) on the Galápagos islands. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 69: 287-317.
20. Grant PR, Grant BR, Petren K. 2001. A population founded by a single pair of individuals: establishment, expansion, and evolution. Genetica 112-113: 359-382.
21. Immelmann K. 1975. Ecological significance of imprinting and early experience. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 6: 15-37.
22. Irwin D. 2000. Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution 54: 998-1010.
23. Irwin D & Price TD. 1999. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation. Heredity 82: 347-354.
24. Kroodsma DE. 1989. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks. Animal Behaviour 37: 600-609.
25. Kroodsma DE, Byers BE, Goodale E, Johnson S, Liu W-C. 2001. Pseudoreplication in playback experiments, revisited a decade later. Animal Behaviour 61: 1029-1033.
26. Losos JB, Jackman TR, Larson A, deQueiroz K, Rodríguez-Schettino L. 1998. Historical contingency and determinism in replicated adaptive radiations of island lizards. Science 279: 2115-2118.
27. MacDougall-Shackleton EA & MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2001. Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution 55: 2568-2575.
28. Martens J. 1996. Vocalizations and speciation in Palearctic birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, eds. The ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Comstock, 221-240.
29. Mayr E. 1940. Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist 74: 249-278.
30. Mayr E. 1969. Bird speciation in the tropics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1: 1-17.
31. Mayr E & Diamond J. 2001. The birds of northern Melanesia. speciation, ecology, and biogeography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. McGregor PK, Catchpole CK, Dabelstein T, Falls JB, Fusani L, Gerhardt HC, Gilbert F, Horn AG, Klump GM, Kroodsma DE, Lambrechts MM, McComb KE, Nelson DA, Pepperberg IM, Ratcliffe L, Searcy WA, Weary DM. 1992. Design of playback experiments: the Thornbridge Hall NATO ARW Consensus. In: McGregor PK, ed. Playback and studies of animal communication. New York: Plenum, 1-9.
33. Morton ES. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. American Naturalist 109: 17-34.
34. Nelson DA. 1989. The importance of invariant and distinctive features in species recognition of bird song. Condor 91: 120-130.
35. Nelson DA & Marler P. 1990. The perception of bird song and an important concept of signal space. In: Stebbins WC, Berkeley MA, eds. Comparative perception, Vol. 2. Complex signals. New York: Wiley, 443-478.
36. Petren K, Grant BR, Grant PR. 1999. A phylogeny of Darwin's finches based on microsatellite DNA length variation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 266: 321-329.
37. Podos J. 1997. A performance constraint on the evolution of trilled vocalizations in a songbird subfamily (Passeriformes: Emberizidae). Evolution 51: 537-551.
38. Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 409: 185-188.
39. Price T. 1998. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 353: 251-260.
40. Ratcliffe LM. 1981. Species recognition in Darwin's Ground Finches (Geospiza, Gould). PhD Thesis. Montreal: McGill University.
41. Ratcliffe LM & Grant PR. 1983. Species recognition in Darwin's Finches (Geospiza, Gould). II. Geographic variation in mate preference. Animal Behaviour 31: 1154-1165.
42. Ratcliffe LM & Grant PR. 1985. Species recognition in Darwin's Finches (Geospiza, Gould). III. Male responses to playback of different song types, dialects and heterospecific songs. Animal Behaviour 33: 290-307.
43. Ratcliffe L & Otter K. 1996. Sex differences in song recognition. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, eds. The ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Comstock, 339-355.
44. Salomon M. 1989. Song as a possible reproductive isolating mechanism between two parapatric forms. The case of the chiffchaffs Phylloscopus c. collybita and P. c. brehmii in the western Pyrenees. Behaviour 111: 270-290.
45. Sato A, O'hUigin C, Figueroa F, Grant PR, Grant BR, Tichy H, Klein J. 1999. Phylogeny of Darwin's Finches as revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96: 5101-5106.
46. Schluter D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47. Schluter D & Grant PR. 1982. The distribution of Geospiza difficilis in relation to G. fuliginosa in the Galápagos islands: tests of three hypotheses. Evolution 36: 1213-1226.
48. Schluter D & Grant PR. 1984. Ecological correlates of morphological evolution in a Darwin's finch species. Evolution 38: 856-869.
49. Searcy WA & Brenowitz EA. 1988. Sexual differences in species recognition of avian song. Nature 332: 152-154.
50. Searcy WA, Nowicki S, Hughes M, Peters S. 2002. Geographic song discrimination in relation to dispersal distances in song sparrows. American Naturalist 159: 221-230.
51. Searcy W & Yasukawa K. 1996. Song and female choice. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, eds. The ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca, NY: Comstock, 454-473.
52. Sokal RR & Rohlf FJ. 1996. Biometry, 3rd edn. New York: W.H. Freeman.
53. Thielcke G. 1973. On the origin of divergence of learned signals (songs) in isolated populations. Ibis 115: 511-516.
54. Wagner WL & Funk VA, eds. 1996. Hawaiian biogeography. Evolution on a hotspot. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
55. Wiley RH. 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for terrestrial oscine birds of eastern North America. American Naturalist 138: 973-993.
56. Wiley RH & Richards DG. 1982. Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller, EH, eds. Acoustic communication in birds. New York: Academic Press, 131-181.
57. Yamaguchi S & Eguchi K. 1996. Comparative foraging ecology of Madagascar vangids (Vangidae). Ibis 138: 283-290.