Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal disease: A meta-analysis

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 57, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 2103-2112

  Zhou, Yan Ming ^a   Wu, Lu Peng ^a   Zhao, Yan Fang ^b   Xu, Dong Hui ^a   Li, Bin ^a  

^a THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF XIAMEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Colorectal surgery; Conventional laparoscopy; Meta analysis; Single incision laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER SURGERY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL DISEASE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FLATULENCE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; ONCOLOGY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COLONIC DISEASES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RECTAL DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866392371     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: 15732568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-012-2145-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aziz O, Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:413-424. doi:10.1245/ASO.2006.05.045.
2. Veenhof AA, Sietses C, von Blomberg BM, et al. The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011;26:53-59. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1056-9.
3. Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN, Yih PC, Chan OC, Li MK. Prospective randomized comparative study of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2011;202:254-258. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.12.009.
4. Lakdawala MA, Muda NH, Goel S, Bhasker A. Single-incision sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy - a randomised pilot study. Obes Surg. 2011;21: 1664-1670. doi:10.1007/s11695-011-0478-y.
5. Raakow R, Jacob DA. Initial experience in laparoscopic singleport appendectomy: a pilot study. Dig Surg. 2011;28:74-79. doi: 10.1159/000322921.
6. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Reavis KM. Single laparoscopic incision transabdominal (SLIT) surgery-adjustable gastric banding: a novel minimally invasive surgical approach. Obes Surg. 2008;18:1628-1631. doi:10.1007/s11695- 008-9705-6.
7. Koyanagi T, Motomura S. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery: application to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;83:305-309. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1358-8.
8. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P. Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:1013-1016. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0519-8.
9. Merchant AM, Lin E. Single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for a colon mass. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1021-1024. doi:10.1007/DCR. 0b013e3181a4fabe.
10. Gaujoux S, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y. Single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:1066-1071. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318. 2010.02404.x.
11. Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1549-1554. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e31 81e85875.
12. Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, et al. Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1467-1472. doi:10. 1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0.
13. Chen WT, Chang SC, Chiang HC, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1887-1892. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1481-4.
14. Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP. Single-incision versus straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:183-186. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fd48af.
15. Kim SJ, Ryu GO, Choi BJ, et al. The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2011;254:933-940. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013 e318237826b.
16. Gaujoux S, Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;16:629-634. doi:10.1007/s11605-011-1780-7.
17. Lee SW, Milsom JW, Nash GM. Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:1355-1361. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822c8d41.
18. Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:72-80. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. 2011.02.010.
19. Papaconstantinou HT, Thomas JS. Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery. 2011;150:820-827. doi:10.1016/j.surg. 2011.07.060.
20. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg. 2011. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1016/j. amjsurg.2011.09.005.
21. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1-12.
22. Athanasiou T, Al-Ruzzeh S, Kumar P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:745-753. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.07. 002.
23. Lu CC, Lin SE, Chung KC, Rau KM. Comparison of clinical outcome of single incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2011;14:e171- e176. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02825.x.
24. Fujii S, Watanabe K, Ota M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case-control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost. Surg Endosc. 2011. (Epub ahead of print). doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2047-9.
25. Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, et al. Singleincision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg. 2012;255: 66-69. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442.
26. Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, et al. Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a casematched series. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:96-102. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-1833-8.
27. Rijcken E, Mennigen R, Argyris I, Senninger N, Bruewer M. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55:140-146. doi:10. 1097/DCR.0b013e31823d0e0d.
28. Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2011. (Epub ahead of print). doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0.
29. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1198-1201. doi:10.1007/s004649900568.