Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research

International Journal of Qualitative Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 368-383

  Williams, Sarah ^a   Clausen, Maria Giatsi ^b   Robertson, Ann ^c   Peacock, Susi ^b   McPherson, Kerri ^d  

^a BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^d GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Asynchronous online focus groups; Ethics; Internet; Online research; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883757088     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16094069     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/160940691201100405     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams, J., Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2005). Investigating the "self" in deliberate self-harm. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1293-1309.
2. Adler, C. L., & Zarchin, Y. R. (2002). The "virtual focus group": Using the Internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 31(4), 418-427.
3. Atkinson, N. L., Saperstein, S. L., & Pleis, J. (2009). Using the Internet for health-related activities: Findings from a national probability sample. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(1).
4. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimmons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33-48.
5. Boshoff, K., Alant, E., & May, E. (2005). Occupational therapy managers' perceptions of challenges faced in early intervention service delivery in South Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 232-242.
6. British Psychological Society. (2007). Report of the working party on conducting research on the Internet: Guidelines for the ethical practice in psychological research online. Leicester, United Kingdom: The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from http://www.bps.org.uk
7. Bruggen, E., & Willems, P. (2009). A critical comparison of offline focus groups, online focus groups and e-Delphi. International Journal of Market Research, 51(3), 363-381.
8. Campbell, M. K., Meier, A., Carr, C., Enga, Z., James, A. S., Reedy, J., & Zheng, B. (2001). Health behavior changes after colon cancer: A comparison of findings from face-to-face and on-line focus groups. Family Community Health, 24(3), 88-103.
9. Chen, P., & Hinton, S. M. (1999). Real-time interviewing using the World Wide Web. Sociological Research Online, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/chen.html
10. Dickerson, S. S., & Feitshans, L. A. (2003). Internet users becoming immersed in the virtual world: Implications for nurses. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 21(6), 300-308.
11. Ess, C., & the AoIR ethics working committee (Approved by AOIR, November 27, 2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Retrieved from www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
12. Etherington, K. (Ed). (2003). Trauma, the body and transformation: A narrative inquiry. London, United Kingdom: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
13. Finlay, L. (2006). The body's disclosure in phenomenological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(1), 19-30.
14. Fox, F. E., Morris, M., & Rumsey, N. (2007). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17(4), 539-547.
15. Gaiser, T. (1997). Conducting online focus groups. A methodological discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 15(2), 135-144.
16. Garcia, A. C., Standlee, A. I., Bechkoff, J., & Cui, Y. (2009). Ethnographic approaches to the Internet and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(52), 359-387.
17. Graffigna, G., & Bosio, A. C. (2006). The Influence of setting on findings produced in qualitative health research: A comparison between face-to-face and online discussion groups about HIV/AIDS. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(3), 1-16.
18. Illingworth, N. (2001). The Internet matters: Exploring the use of the Internet as a research tool. Sociological Research Online, 6(2). Retrieved from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/6/2/illingworth.html
19. Im, E. (2006). White cancer patients' perception of gender and ethnic differences in pain experience. Cancer Nursing, 29(6), 441-452.
20. Im, E., Guevara, E., & Chee, W. (2007). The pain experience of Hispanic patients with cancer in the United States. Oncology Nursing Forum, 34(4), 861-868.
21. Internet World Statistics. (2011). Retrieved from http://www.Internetworldstats.com
22. James, N., & Busher, H. (2009). Online interviewing. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
23. Joinson, A. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
24. Joinson, A. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Kenny, A. J. (2005). Interaction in cyberspace: An online focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 49(4), 414-422.
26. King, S. (1996). Researching Internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2), 119-127.
27. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
28. Langdridge, D. (2007). Phenomenological psychology. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
29. Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication in qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
30. McKenna, K. Y. A. (2007). Through the Internet looking glass: Expressing and validating the true self. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 205-222). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
31. Murray, C. D. (2004). An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(16), 963-973.
32. Murray, C. D., & Sixsmith, J. (1998). E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(2), 103-121.
33. Murray, P. J. (1997). Using focus groups in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 7(4), 542-549.
34. Oringderff, J. (2004). "My way": Piloting an online focus group. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(3), 69-75. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4466/37 91
35. Peacock, S., Robertson, A., Williams, S., & Clausen, M. (2009). The role of learning technologists in supporting e-research. ALT-J, 17(2), 115-129.
36. Pennebaker, J. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic and therapeutic implications. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 31(6), 539-548.
37. Reid, D. J., & Reid, F. J. M. (2005). Online focus groups. International Journal of Market Research, 47(2), 131-162.
38. Robertson, A. R. R. (2008). Self help and the early management of acute, nonspecific low back pain. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://etheses.qmu.ac.uk/128/
39. Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2006). The ethics of using the Internet to collect qualitative research data. Research Ethics Review, 2(3), 92-97.
40. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A. (2010). Interviews and Internet forums: A comparison of two sources of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 20(5), 595-606.
41. Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395-416.
42. Suler, J. (2004). The Psychology of Cyberspace. Retrieved from http://users.rider.edu/suler/psycyber/psycyber.html
43. Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 139-153). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
44. Tates, K., Zwaanswijk, M., Otten, R., van Dulmen, S., Hoogerbrugge, P. M., Kamps, W. A., & Bensing, J. M. (2009). Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: Examples from paediatric oncology. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(15).
45. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
46. Turney, L., & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2), 1-10.
47. Walstrom, M. K. (2000). "You know, who's the thinnest?": Combating surveillance and creating safety in coping with eating disorders online. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 761-783.
48. Watson, M., Peacock, S., & Jones, D. (2006). The analysis of interaction in online focus groups. International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation, 13(12), 551-557.
49. Whitty, M., & Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace romance: The psychology of online relationships. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
50. Williams, S. (2009). Understanding anorexia nervosa: An online phenomenological approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://etheses.qmu.ac.uk/135/
51. Williams, S., & Reid, M. (2010). Understanding the experience of ambivalence in anorexia nervosa. Psychology & Health, 25(5), 551-567.
52. Williams, S., & Reid, M. (2012). It's like there are two people in my head: A phenomenological analysis of the exploration of anorexia nervosa and its relationship to the self. Psychology & Health, 27(7), 798-815.
53. Wood, R. T. A., & Griffiths, M. D. (2007). Online data collection from gamblers: Methodological issues. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 5, 151-163.