Change of patients' perceptions of telemedicine after brief use

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 530-535

  Cranen, Karlijn ^a   Veld, Rianne Huis In't ^a   Ijzerman, Maarten ^b   Vollenbroek Hutten, Miriam ^a,b  

^a ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

exercise; home care; patient acceptance of healthcare; technology acceptance; telemedicine; therapy

Indexed keywords

EXERCISE; HOME CARE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTHCARE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; THERAPY;

HEALTH CARE; RISK PERCEPTION; SURVEYS; USER INTERFACES;

TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESISTANCE TRAINING; TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; RESISTANCE TRAINING; TELEMEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80051956019     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0208     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287-333.
2. Jensen MP, Nielson WR, Turner JA, Romano JM, Hill ML. Changes in readiness to self-manage pain are associated with improvement in multidisciplinary pain treatment and pain coping. Pain 2004;111:84-95.
3. Blyth FM, March LM, Brnabic AJ, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain and frequent use of health care. Pain 2004;111:51-58.
4. Agrell H, Dahlberg S, Jerant AF. Patients' perceptions regarding home telecare. Telemed J E Health 2000;6:409-415.
5. Ruland CM, Moore SM. Eliciting exercise preferences in cardiac rehabilitation: Initial evaluation of a new strategy. Patient Educ Couns 2000;1444:1-9.
6. Jones M, Jolly K, Raftery J, Lip GY, Greenfield S. "DNA" may not mean "did not participate": A qualitative study of reasons for non-adherence at home- and centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Fam Pract 2007;24:343-357.
7. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: A sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform 1999;55:87-101.
8. Broens TF, Huis in 't Veld MHA, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. Determinants for successful telemedicine implementation: A literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13:303-309.
9. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml V, Berry L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J Mark 1985;49:41-50.
10. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 1989;13:319-339.
11. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci 1989;35:982-1002.
12. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform Syst Res 1995;6:144-176.
13. Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Demiris G, Veen M, Lundgren JM, Potthoff S. Telehomecare: Quality, perception, satisfaction. Telemed J E Health 2004;10:122-128.
14. Demiris G, Speedie SM, Finkelstein S. Change of patients' perceptions of TeleHomeCare. Telemed J E Health 2001;7:241-248.
15. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press, 2003.
16. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q 2003;27:425-478.
17. Gartner Hype Cycle. Available at www.gartner.com/technology/research/ methodologies/hype-cycle.jsp (last accessed October 1, 2010).
18. Hanson D, Calhoun J, Smith D. Changes in provider attitudes toward telemedicine. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:39-43.