Relation between patient satisfaction, compliance and the clinical benefit of a teletreatment application for chronic pain

Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 322-328

  Huis in't Veld, Rianne M H A ^a   Kosterink, Stephanie M ^a   Barbe, Tom ^b   Lindegård, Agneta ^c   Marecek, Tobias ^d   Vollenbroek Hutten, Miriam M R ^a,e  

^a ROESSINGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c Institute of Stress Medicine   (Sweden)

^d RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DISABILITY; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSORY FEEDBACK; SHOULDER PAIN; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICS; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EUROPE; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SHOULDER PAIN; TELEMEDICINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956767772     PISSN: 1357633X     EISSN: 17581109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2010.006006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517-20
2. Fishbein M, Azjen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975
3. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989;13:210-15
4. Gatian AW. Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Information and Management 1994;26:119-31
5. McCracken LM, Evon D, Karapas ET. Satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain in a specialty service: preliminary prospective results. Eur J Pain 2002;6:387-93
6. Kane RL, Maciejewski M, Finch M. The relationship of patient satisfaction with care and clinical outcomes. Med Care 1997;35:714-30
7. Cramer JA, Benedict A, Muszbek N, Keskinaslan A, Khan ZM. The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review. Int J Clin Pract 2008;62:76-87
8. Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry LL. SERVQUAL: a multiple - item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing 1988;64:2-40
9. Brown SW, Swartz TA. A gap analysis of professional service qualities. J Mark 1989;53:92-8.
10. Thompson AG, Suñol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care 1995;7:127-41
11. La Monica EL, Oberst MT, Madea AR, Wolf RM. Development of a patient satisfaction scale. Res Nurs Health 1986;9:43-50
12. Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:185-210
13. Hermens HJ, Hutten MMR. Muscle activation in chronic pain: its treatment using a new approach of myofeedback. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2002;30:325-36
14. Voerman GE, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ. Changes in pain, disability, and muscle activation patterns in chronic whiplash patients after ambulant myofeedback training. Clin J Pain 2006;22:656-63
15. Huis in't Veld RMHA, Huijgen BCH, Schaake L, Hermens HJ, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. The feasibility of remotely supported myofeedback treatment in women with neck-shoulder pain related to computerwork. Telemed J E-health 2008;14:545-51
16. Karlqvist L, Tornqvist EW, Hagberg M, Hagman M, Toomingas A. Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms: a cross-sectional study focusing on gender differences. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2002;30:277-94
17. Tornqvist EW, Hagberg M, Hagman M, Risberg EH, Toomingas A. The influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:689-702
18. Hu PJ, Chau PY, Sheng OL, Tam KY. Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems 1999;16:91-112
19. Gift AG. Visual analogue scales: measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989;38:286-8
20. Todd KH. Clinical versus statistical significance in the assessment of pain relief. Ann Emerg Med 1996;27:439-41
21. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain 1990;40:171-82
22. Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 1999;23:239-60
23. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 2003;27:425-78
24. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006;28:823-30
25. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor Control And Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. 4th edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2005
26. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Yu F. Satisfaction as a predictor of clinical outcomes among chiropractic and medical patients enrolled in the UCLA low back pain study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:2121-8
27. Skolasky RL, Albert TJ, Vaccaro AR, Riley LH. Patient satisfaction in the cervical spine research society outcomes study: relationship to improved clinical outcome. Spine J 2009;9:232-9
28. Huis in't Veld MH, van Dijk H, Hermens HJ, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM. A systematic review of the methodology of telemedicine evaluation in patients with postural and movement disorders. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:289-97