Overcoming barriers to collaborative transboundary water governance

Mountain Research and Development

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 215-224

  Daniel, Jessica R ^a   Pinel, Sandra Lee ^a   Brooks, Jase ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

agency; aquifer; collaboration; ethnography; regional planning; Rocky Mountains; Transboundary; water resources

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; POLITICAL CHANGE; REGIONAL PLANNING; TRANSBOUNDARY COOPERATION; URBAN AREA; WATER QUALITY;

IDAHO; ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON [UNITED STATES];

EID: 84883706389     PISSN: 02764741     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00121.1     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Agranoff R. 2005. Managing collaborative performance: Changingthe boundaries of the state? Public Performance & Management Review 29(1):18-45. (Pubitemid 41553574)
2. Bergman SA, Bliss JC. 2004. Foundations of cross-boundary cooperation: Resource management at the public-private interface. Society and Natural Resources 17(4):377-393. (Pubitemid 38546390)
3. Berkes F. 2010. Devolution of environment and resources governance: Emerging and future trends. Environmental Conservation 37(4):489-500.
4. Booher DE, Innes JE. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21(3):221-236. (Pubitemid 44795335)
5. Brooks J. 2010. Exploring Bioregionalism in the Intermountain West: A Review of Human Dimensions Affecting Regional Water Resources Management in the Spokane-Coeur d'Alene Transportation Corridor [Master's Project]. Moscow, Idaho: University of Idaho. Available from the corresponding author of this article.
6. Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, Theobald DM. 2005. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950-2000. Ecological Applications 15:1851-1863. (Pubitemid 43112050)
7. Debarbieux B, Price MF. 2012. Mountain regions: A global mountain good? Mountain Research and Development 32(3):57-68.
8. Forester J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Greenwood GB. 2012. The mountain research initiative: What comes next? Mountain Research and Development 32(4):456-460.
10. Hamilton K, Selman P. 2005. The 'landscape scale' in planning: Recent experience of bio-geographic planning units in Britain. Landscape Research 30(4):549-558. (Pubitemid 41823565)
11. Hamin EM, Marucci DJ. 2008. Ad hoc regionalism. Journal of Rural Studies 24(4):467-477.
12. Healey P. 1999. Institutional analysis, communicative planning and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19:111-121. (Pubitemid 30132580)
13. Heikkila T, Gerlak A. 2005. The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: Clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. The Policy Studies Journal 33(4):583-612. (Pubitemid 41701366)
14. Idaho Water Resources Board. 2011. Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Comprehensive Aquifer Management Plan. Idaho Water Resources Board. http://www.idwr. idaho.gov/waterboard/WaterPlanning/CAMP/RP-CAMP/pdf/2011/RP-CAMP-final-Adopted- Plan.pdf; accessed 13 November 2012.
15. Innes JE, Booher DE. 2010. Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
16. Jahir J. 2013. 2010 Parcels in Kootenai County, Idaho, and Spokane County, Washington, Using Assessor Data. Available from the corresponding author of this article.
17. Kliot N, Shmueli D, Shamir U. 2001. Institutions for management of transboundarywater resources: Their nature, characteristics and shortcomings. Water Policy 3:229-255. (Pubitemid 32900970)
18. Koontz TM, Johnson EM. 2004. One size does not fit all: Matching breadth of stakeholder participation to watershed group accomplishments. Policy Sciences 37(2):185-204. (Pubitemid 39547080)
19. Lockwood M, Davidson J, Curtis A, Stratford E, Griffith R. 2010. Governance principles for natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 23(10):986-1001.
20. MacFarlane R. 2000. Achieving whole-landscape management across multiple land management units: A case study from the Lake District environmentally sensitive area. Landscape Research 25(2):229-254. (Pubitemid 30600223)
21. MacInnis JD, Lackaff BB, Boese RM, Stevens G, King S, Lindsay RC. 2009. The Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer Atlas 2009 Update. Spokane, WA: City of Spokane.
22. Margerum RD. 2007. Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Society and Natural Resources 20(2):135-152. (Pubitemid 46978609)
23. Margerum RD. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41(4):487-500.
24. Merry D, Cook S. 2012. Fostering institutional creativity at multiple levels: Toward facilitated institutional bricolage. Water Alternatives 5(1):1-19.
25. Moore EA, Koontz TM. 2003. Research note: A typology of collaborative watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society & Natural Resources 16(5):451-460. (Pubitemid 36689635)
26. Morrison TH. 2006. Pursuing rural sustainability at the regional level: Key lessons from the literature on institutions, integration, and the environment. Journal of Planning Literature 21(2):143-152.
27. Nigel W. 2012. Transboundary water management: Principles and practice [book review]. Mountain Research and Development 32(1):96-97.
28. Norman ES, Bakker K, Cook C. 2012. Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives 5(1):52-61.
29. Travis WR. 2007. New Geographies of the American West: Land Use and Changing Patterns of Place. Washington DC: Island Press.