Generalised modelling approach for anaerobic co-digestion of fermentable substrates

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 147, Issue , 2013, Pages 525-533

  García Gen, Santiago ^a   Lema, Juan M ^a   Rodríguez, Jorge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

ADM1; Anaerobic co digestion; Fermentation; Modelling; Multiple substrates

Indexed keywords

FERMENTATION; FERMENTERS; MODELS; SUBSTRATES;

ADM1; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MODEL; FERMENTATION KINETICS; GENERAL METHODOLOGIES; LIQUID COMPOSITIONS; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; MULTIPLE SUBSTRATES;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

ALCOHOL; AMMONIA; BIOGAS; CARBOHYDRATE; GELATIN; GLYCEROL; LACTIC ACID; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CALIBRATION; FERMENTATION; INHIBITION; MANURE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PIG; REACTION KINETICS; SUBSTRATE; SUGAR;

ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC FILTER; ARTICLE; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHEMICAL REACTION; EFFLUENT; ELECTRON; FERMENTATION; KINETICS; LIQUID; MANURE; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; NONHUMAN; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STOICHIOMETRY; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; UPFLOW REACTOR; WINE;

SUIDAE;

ACOD; AD; ADM1; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION MODEL NO. 1; BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL; BMP; C/N; CARBON TO NITROGEN RATIO; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COD; CODS; CODT; FERMENTATION; HRT; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; LCFA; LONG CHAIN FATTY ACIDS; MODELLING; MULTIPLE SUBSTRATES; OLR; ORGANIC LOADING RATE; SOLID RETENTION TIME; SOLUBLE CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; SRT; TAN; TKN; TOTAL AMMONIA NITROGEN; TOTAL CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; TOTAL KJELDAHL NITROGEN; TOTAL SOLIDS; TS; UASB-AF; UPFLOW ANAEROBIC SLUDGE BLANKET - ANAEROBIC FILTER REACTOR; VFA; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; VOLATILE SOLIDS; VOLATILE SUSPENDED SOLIDS; VS; VSS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND ANALYSIS; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; KINETICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84883676976     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.063     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvarez J.A., Otero L., Lema J.M. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1153-1158.
2. Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B.K. A mathematical model for dynamic simulation of anaerobic digestion of complex substrates: focusing on ammonia inhibition. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 42:159-166.
3. Antonopoulou G., Gavala H.N., Skiadas I.V., Lyberatos G. Modeling of fermentative hydrogen production from sweet sorghum extract based on modified ADM1. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:191-208.
4. APHA, AWWA, WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 20th ed.
5. Astals S., Nolla-Ardèvol V., Mata-Alvarez J. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and crude glycerol at mesophilic conditions: biogas and digestate. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 110:63-70.
6. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., Sanders W.T.M., Siegrist H., Vavilin V.A. Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 2002, IWA Publishing, London.
7. Batstone D.J., Torrijos M.J., Ruiz C., Schmidt J.E. Use of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor for parameter estimation in modelling of anaerobic digestion. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50:295-303.
8. Biernacki P., Steinigeweg S., Borchert A., Uhlenhut F. Application of anaerobic digestion model no. 1 for describing anaerobic digestion of grass, maize, green weed silage, and industrial glycerine. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 127:188-194.
9. Comino E., Riggio V.A., Rosso M. Biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and cheese whey. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:46-53.
10. Chen Y., Cheng J.J., Creamer K.S. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:4044-4064.
11. Donoso-Bravo A., Mailier J., Martin C., Rodríguez J., Aceves-Lara C.A., Vande Wouwer A. Model selection, identification and validation in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Res. 2011, 45:5347-5364.
12. Fezzani B., Ben Cheikh R. Extension of the anaerobic digestion model no. 1 (ADM1) to include phenol compounds biodegradation processes for simulating the anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastes at mesophilic temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 172:1430-1438.
13. Galí A., Benabdallah T., Astals S., Mata-Alvarez J. Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:2783-2790.
14. García, C., 2010. "Modelling and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment processes". PhD. Thesis. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Spain.
15. Hartmann H., Angelidaki I., Arhing B.K. Co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal waste with other waste types. Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes 2003, IWA Publishing, UK. J. Mata-Alvarez (Ed.).
16. Harper S.R., Pohland F.G. Recent developments in hydrogen management during anaerobic biological wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986, 28(4):585-602.
17. Hernandez J.E., Edyvean R.G.J. Inhibition of biogas production and biodegradability by substituted phenolic compounds in anaerobic sludge. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160:20-28.
18. Hidaka T., Horie T., Akao S., Tsuno H. Kinetic model of thermophilic l-lactate fermentation by Bacillus coagulans combined with real-time PCR quantification. Water Res. 2010, 44(8):2554-2562.
19. Kleerebezem R., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M. Critical analysis of some concepts proposed in ADM1. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(4):51-57.
20. Kleerebezem R., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M. A generalized method for thermodynamic state analysis of environmental systems. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 40(1):1-54.
21. Lübken M., Wichern M., Schlattmann M., Gronauer A., Horn H. Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digester fed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops. Water Res. 2007, 41:4085-4096.
22. Mata-Alvarez J., Dosta J., Mace S., Astals S. Codigestion of solid wastes: a review of its uses and perspectives including modeling. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2011, 31(2):99-111.
23. Molina F., Ruiz-Filippi G., García C., Roca E., Lema J.M. Winery effluent treatment at an anaerobic hybrid USBF pilot plant under normal and abnormal operation. Water Sci. Technol. 2007, 56(2):25-31.
24. Molina F., García C., Roca E., Lema J.M. Characterization of anaerobic granular sludge developed in UASB reactors that treat ethanol, carbohydrates and hydrolyzed protein based wastewaters. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57(6):837-842.
25. Parker W.J. Application of the ADM1 model to advanced anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96(16):1832-1842.
26. Pauss A., Guiot S.R. Hydrogen monitoring in anaerobic sludge bed reactors at various hydraulic regimes and loading rates. Water Environ. Res. 1993, 65(3):276-280.
27. Rajinikanth R., Ramirez I., Steyer J.P., Kumar P., Escudie R., Torrijos M. Experimental and modeling investigations of a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge-filter bed (UASFB) reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 58:109-117.
28. Riaño B., Molinuevo B., García-González M.C. Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102(5):4131-4136.
29. Rodríguez J., Lema J.M., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Kleerebezem R. Variable stoichiometry with thermodynamic control in ADM1. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54(4):101-110.
30. Rodríguez J., Guwy A.J., Dinsdale R., Premier G.C. An implementation framework for wastewater treatment models requiring a minimum programming expertise. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 59(2):367-380.
31. Ruiz, G., 2005. "Monitorización y control avanzado de reactores anaerobios". PhD. Thesis. Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Spain.
32. Schink B., Phelps T.J., Eichler B., Zeikus J.G. Comparison of ethanol degradation pathways in anoxic freshwater environments. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1985, 131:651-660.
33. Seeliger S., Janssen P.H., Schink B. Energetics and kinetics of lactate fermentation to acetate and propionate via methylmalonyl-CoA or acrylyl-CoA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 211:65-70.
34. Skiadas I.V., Gavala H.N., Lyberatos G. Modelling of the periodic anaerobic baffled reactor (PABR) based on the retaining factor concept. Water Res. 2000, 34:3725-3736.
35. Sørensen A.H., Winther-Nielsen M., Ahring B.K. Kinetics of lactate, acetate and propionate in unadapted and lactate-adapted thermophilic, anaerobic sewage sludge: the influence of sludge adaptation for start-up of thermophilic UASB reactors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1991, 34:823-827.