Potential for methane production from anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure with winery wastewater

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 4131-4136

  Riano B ^a   Molinuevo, B ^a   Garcia Gonzalez M C ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO AGRARIO DE CASTILLA Y LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anaerobic co digestion; Methane; Swine manure; Winery wastewater

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; BATCH EXPERIMENTS; CODIGESTION; MESOPHILIC CONDITION; METHANE PRODUCTION; METHANE YIELD; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SEMI-CONTINUOUS; SWINE MANURE; WINERY WASTEWATER;

MANURES; METHANE; REMOVAL; WASTEWATER; WINE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

METHANE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOCHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MANURE; METHANE; WASTEWATER;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MANURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WINE INDUSTRY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BIOREACTORS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; MANURE; METHANE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SWINE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 79151473862     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.077     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Álvarez J.A., Otero L., Lema J.M. A methodology for optimising feed composition for anaerobic co-digestion of agro-industrial wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:1153-1158.
2. Amon T., Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Bodiroza V., Pötsh E., Zollisch W. Optimising methane yield from anaerobic digestion of manure: effects of dairy systems and of glycerine supplementation. International Congress Series 2006, 1293:217-220.
3. Angelidaki, I., Ahring, B., 1997. Anaerobic digestion in Denmark. Past present and future. III Cud́ Enginyeria Ambiental Lleida, pp. 336-342.
4. Angelidaki I., Ellegard L. Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2003, 109:95-105.
5. Banks C.J., Humphreys P.N. The anaerobic treatment of ligno-cellulosic substrate offering little natural pH buffering capacity. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38(4/5):29-35.
6. Box G.E.P., Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 1951, 13:1-45.
7. Bustamante M.A., Paredes C., Moral R., Moreno-Caselles J., Pérez-Espinosa A., Pérez-Murcia M.D. Uses of winery and distillery effluents in agriculture: characterisation of nutrient and hazardous components. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51(1):145-151.
8. Callaghan F.J., Wase D.A.J., Thayanithy K., Forster C.F. Co-digestion of waste organic solids: batch studies. Bioresour. Technol. 1999, 67:117-122.
9. Campos, E., 2001. Optimización de la digestión anaerobia de purines de cerdo mediante codigestión con residuos orgánicos de la industria agroalimentaria. PhD Thesis. University of Lleida, Spain.
10. Campos E., Palatsi J., Flotats X. Co-digestion of pig slurry and organic wastes from food industry. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste 1999, 192-195. J. Mata-Álvarez, A. Tilche, F. Cecchi (Eds.).
11. Chong M.L., Rahman N.A., Rahim R.A., Aziz S.A., Shirai Y., Hassan M.A. Optimization of biohydrogen production by Clostridium butyricum EB6 from palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34:7475-7482.
12. Colin T., Bories A., Sire Y., Perrin R. Treatment and valorisation of winery wastewater by a new biophysical process (ECCF®). Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51(1):99-106.
13. Colleran E., Concannon F., Golde T., Geoghegan F., Crumlish B., Killile E., Henry M., Coates J. Use of the methanogenic activity tests to characterize anaerobic sludges, screen for anaerobic biodegradability and determine toxicity thresholds against individual anaerobic trophic groups and species. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25:31-40.
14. De Baere L.A., Devocht M., Van Assche P., Verstraete W. Influence of high NaCl and NH4Cl salt levels on methanogenic association. Water Res. 1984, 18:543-548.
15. Ferreira L., Duarte E., Silva C., Malfeito M. Fruit wastes bioconversion for anaerobic co-digestion with pig manure. Process development for the recycling in decentralised farm scale plants. Proceedings of the International Conference Progress in Biogas 2007, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 135-140.
16. Fountoulakis M.S., Drakopoulou S., Terzakis S., Georgaki E., Manios T. Potential for methane production from typical Mediterranean agro-industrial. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:155-161.
17. González-Fernández C., Nieto-Diez P.P., León-Cofreces C., García-Encina P.A. Solids and nutrients removals from the liquid fraction of swine slurry through screening and flocculation treatment and influence of these processes on anaerobic biodegradability. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:6233-6239.
18. Hartmann H., Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Co-digestion of the organic fraction of municipal waste types. Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes 2003, IWA Publishing, UK. J. Mata-Álvarez (Ed.).
19. Iannotti E.L., Porter J.H., Fischer J.R., Sievers D.M. Changes in swine manure during anaerobic digestion. Dev. Ind. Microbiol. 1979, 20:519-529.
20. Kaparaju P., Rintala J. Anaerobic co-digestion of potato tuber and its industrial by-products with pig manure. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005, 43:175-188.
21. Martínez-García G., Johnson A.C., Bachmann R.T., Williams C.J., Burgoyne A., Edyvean R.G.J. Two-stage biological treatment of olive mill wastewater with whey as co-substrate. International Biodeterioration Biodegradation 2007, 59:273-282.
22. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (MARM), 2010., reference date (26.05.10). http://www.mapa.es/es/estadistica/pags/anuario/2008/indice.asp.
23. Molnar L., Bartha I. High solids anaerobic fermentation for biogas and compost production. Biomass 1998, 16:173-182.
24. Murto M., Bjöjrnsson L., Mattiasson B. Impact of food industrial waste on anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and pig manure. J. Environ. Manage. 2004, 70(2):101-107.
25. Panichnumsin P., Nopharatana A., Ahring B., Chaiprasert P. Production of methane by co-digestion of cassava pulp with various concentrations of pig manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1117-1124.
26. Petruccioli M., Cardoso Duarte J., Eusebio A., Federico F. Aerobic treatment of winery wastewater using a jet-loop activated sludge reactor. Process Biochem. 2002, 37:821-829.
27. Resch, C., Wörl, A., Waltenberger, R., Braun, R., Kirchmayr, R., 2010. Enhancement options for the utilization of nitrogen rich animal by-products in anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.biotech.2010.11.044.
28. Riaño, B., 2008. Depuración de aguas residuales de bodega mediante procesos biológicos. PhD. Thesis. University of Burgos, Spain.
29. Ripley L.E., Boyle W.C., Converse J.C. Improved alkalimetric monitoring for anaerobic digestion of high-strength wastes. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 1986, 58(5):406-411.
30. Soldano M., Fabbri C., Piccinini S. Co-digestion plant in dairy cattle farm in Emilia Romagna region (Italy). Proceedings of the International Conference Progress in Biogas 2007, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 95-99.
31. Standard Methods for the examination of Water and Wastewater APHA, 2005. 21st ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.
32. Wu X., Wanying Y., Zhu J., Miller C. Biogas and CH4 productivity by co-digesting swine manure with three crop residues as an external carbon source. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4042-4047.