Supply chain analysis using simulation, gaussian process modelling and optimisation

International Journal of Simulation Modelling

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 178-189

  Smew, W ^a   Young, P ^a   Geraghty, J ^a  

^a DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Discrete Event Simulation; Gaussian Process Modelling; Hybrid Kanban CONWIP; Optimisation; Supply Chain Management

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883633492     PISSN: 17264529     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2507/IJSIMM12(3)4.239     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Simchi-Levi, D.; Kaminsky, P.; Simchi-Levi, E. (2003). Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies, McGraw-Hill, New York
2. Ghrayeb, O.; Phojanamongkolkij, N.; Tan, B. A. (2009). A hybrid push/pull system in assemble-to-order manufacturing environment, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 20, No. 4, 379-387, doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0112-6
3. Takahashi, K.; Nakamura, N. (2004). Push, pull, or hybrid control in supply chain management, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing., Vol. 17, No. 2, 126-140, doi:10.1080/09511920310001593083
4. Krishnamurthy, A.; Suri, R.; Vernon, M. (2004). Re-examining the performance of MRP and Kanban material control strategies for multi-product flexible manufacturing systems, International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 16, No. 2, 123-150, doi:10.1023/ B:FLEX.0000044837.86194.19
5. Spearman, M. L.; Woodruff, D. L.; Hopp, W. J. (1990). CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 5, 879-894, doi:10.1080/ 00207549008942761
6. Deleersnyder, J.-L.; Hodgson, T. J.; King, R. E.; O'Grady, P. J.; Savva, A. (1992). Integrating Kanban type pull systems and MRP type push systems: Insights from a Markovian model, IIE Transactions, Vol. 24, No. 3, 43-56, doi:10.1080/07408179208964223
7. Spearman, M. L.; Zazanis, M. A. (1992). Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons, Operations Research., Vol. 40, No. 3, 521-532, doi:10.1287/opre.40.3.521
8. Lavoie, P.; Gharbi, A.; Kenne, J.-P. (2010). A comparative study of pull control mechanisms for unreliable homogenous transfer lines, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 124, No. 1, 241-251, doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.11.022
9. Bonvik, A. M.; Couch, C. E; Gershwin, S. B. (1997). A comparison of production-line control mechanisms, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 35, No. 3, 789-804, doi:10.1080/002075497195713
10. Gaury, E. G. A.; Pierreval, H; Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2000). An evolutionary approach to select a pull system among Kanban, Conwip and Hybrid, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing., Vol. 11, No. 2, 157-167, doi:10.1023/A:1008938816257
11. Gaury, E. G. A.; Kleijnen, J. P. C.; Pierreval, H. (2001). A Methodology to Customize Pull Control Systems, Journal of The Operational Research Society, Vol. 52, No. 7, 789-799, doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601153
12. Kleijnen, J. P. C.; Gaury, E. (2003). Short-term robustness of production management systems: A case study, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 148, No. 2, 452-465, doi:10.1016/ S0377-2217(02)00437-X
13. Geraghty, J.; Heavey, C. (2004). A comparison of Hybrid Push/Pull and CONWIP/Pull production inventory control policies, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 91, No. 1, 75-90, doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00210-X
14. Hodgson, T. J.; Wang, D. (1991). Optimal hybrid push/pull control strategies for a parallel multistage system: Part II, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, No. 7, 1453-1460, doi:10.1080/00207549108948022
15. rd Winter Simulation Conference, 1129-1137
16. O'Hagan, A. (2006). Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 91, No. 10-11, 1290-1300, doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.025
17. Barton, R. R.; Meckesheimer, M. (2006). Metamodel-based simulation optimization, Henderson, S. G.; Nelson, B. L. (Eds), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation, Elsevier, New York, Vol. 13, 535-574, doi:10.1016/S0927-0507(06)13018-2
18. Sacks, J.; Welch, W. J.; Mitchell, T. J.; Wynn, H. P. (1989). Design and analysis of computer experiments, Statistical science, Vol. 4, No. 4, 409-423, doi:10.1214/ss/1177012413
19. Van Beers, W. C. M.; Kleijnen, J. P. C. (2008). Customized sequential designs for random simulation experiments: Kriging metamodeling and bootstrapping, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 186, No. 3, 1099-1113, doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.035
20. th Winter Simulation Conference, 565-571
21. McKay, M. D.; Beckman, R. J.; Conover, W. (1979). A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 239-245, doi:10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755
22. Loeppky, J. L.; Sacks, J.; Welch, W. J. (2009). Choosing the Sample Size of a Computer Experiment: A Practical Guide, Technometrics, Vol. 51, No. 4, 366-376, doi:10.1198/ TECH.2009.08040
23. Johnson, M. E.; Moore, L. M.; Ylvisaker, D. (1990). Minimax and maximin distance designs, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 26, No. 2, 131-148, doi:10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B
24. Keeney, R. L.; Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. Kernan, B.; Geraghty, J. (2004). A Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm for Extend, Proceedings of the First Irish Workshop on Simulation in Manufacturing, Services and Logistics, 83-92
26. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
27. Derringer, G.; Suich, R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, 214-219