Determining the tourism potential of the Altindere Valley National Park (Trabzon/Turkey) with respect to its conservation value

International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 358-368

  Düzgüneş, Ertan ^a   Demirel, Öner ^a  

^a KARADENIZ TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

conservation utilization value; nature conservation; protected areas; The Altindere Valley National Park; tourism

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DATA SET; NATIONAL PARK; NATURAL RESOURCE; NATURE CONSERVATION; SURVEY; TOURISM;

ALTINDERE VALLEY; TRABZON [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

EID: 84883574760     PISSN: 13504509     EISSN: 17452627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504509.2013.777861     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Altindere Vadisi Milli Parki uzun devreli gelişme plani, Analitik Etüt Çalişmasi, 2001. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University, School of Forestry.
2. Altindere Vadisi Milli Parki uzun devreli gelişme plani analitik etüt raporu. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanliǧi, Doǧa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüǧü. 2005, Ankara: Belda Proje ve Danişmanlik Ticaret Limited Şirketi.
3. Boo, E. 1990. Ecotourism: the potential and pitfalls, Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund.
4. Çakilcioǧlu, M. 1996. Sürdürülebilir Turizme yönelik bir yöntem önerisi: Doǧu Karadeniz/Trabzon İli Özelinde Bir İrdeleme [Ph.D. Thesis], İstanbul: Mimar Sinan University.
5. Cengiz, T. 2007. Tourism, an ecological approach in protected areas: Karagöl-Sahara National Park, Turkey. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 14: 260-267.
6. Cengiz, T, Çalişkan, E. 2005. Şavşat İlçesi turizm potansiyelinin belirlenmesi, Artvin: Hürriyet Ofset.
7. Chape, S, Blyth, S, Fish, L, Foz, P, Spalding, M. 2003. United Nations list of protected areas. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN and UNEP-WCMC.
8. Chen, WY, Jim, CY. 2012. Contingent valuation of ecotourism development in country parks in the urban shadow. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 19 (1): 44-53.
9. Directorate of Meteorology. 2008. Climate conditions of Altndere Valley National Park. Trabzon: Trabzon Meteorology Regional Offices
10. Dokuzuncu beş yillik kalkinma plani (2007-2013). 2007. Yayin No: 2727. Ankara: D.P.T. Yayinlari.
11. Düzgüneş, E. 2009. Altindere Vadisi Milli Parki (Trabzon)nda koruma deǧeri ile turizm potansiyelinin saptanmasina yönelik bir yöntem yaklaşimi [Ms.C. Thesis], Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University.
12. Düzgüneş, E, Demirel, Ö. Nov 4-6 2010. Determining tourism potantial at Altindere Valley National Park (Trabzon) Vol. 3, Nov 4-6, Trabzon, Turkey. Paper presented at: 1st International Semposium on Turkish Japanese Environment and Forestry
13. Erduran, F. 2003. Ilgaz Daǧi Milli Parkinin koruma ve kullanim ilkeleri açisindan turizm-rekreasyon potansiyelinin saptanmasi üzerine bir araştirma [Ph.D. Thesis], Ankara: Ankara University.
14. Geray, U. 1996. Sürdürülebilir kalkinma, orman kaynaklarinin yönetimi, ulusal çevre eylem plani. Ormancilik Çalişma Grubu, İstanbul: Istanbul University, School of Forestry.
15. Hepcan, Ş. 2000. Koruma-Kullanma ilişkileri temelinde Spil Daǧi Milli Parkinin irdelenmesi. Paper presented at: Peyzaj Mimarliǧi Kongresi; Oct 19-21. Ankara
16. Holden, A. 2000. Environment and tourism, London: Routledge.
17. IUC, N. 1994. Guidelines for protected area management categories, Cambridge, UK: Iucn. CNPPA with the assistance of WCMC. Gland, Switzerland
18. Kabaş, S. 2007. Troya Tarihi Milli Parkinin turizm ve rekreasyon potansiyelinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştirma [M.Sc. Thesis], Çanakkale: Çanakkale On Sekiz Mart University.
19. Kalem, S. 2001. Doǧal ve kültürel deǧerlerin korunabilmesi için turizm potansiyelinin belirlenmesinde bir yöntem yaklaşimi ve Kastamonu İli kiyi bölgesi ve yakin çevresinde uygulanmasi [Ph.D. Thesis], Ankara: Ankara University.
20. Keating, M. 1993. Agenda for change: a plain language version of agenda 21 and other Rio agreements, Geneva, Switzerland: Centre for our Common Future.
21. Keleş, R, Hamamci, C. 1997. Çevrebilim, 2. Baski Ankara
22. Kence, V. 1989. Biyolojik çeşitlilik ve kalkinma. Presented at: Sürdürülebilir Kalkinma Konferansi. Türkiye Çevre Sorunlari Vakfi Yayini; Nov 29-30 Ankara
23. Kent, K, Sinclair, AJ, Diduck, A. 2012. Stakeholder engagement in sustainable adventure toursim development in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve, India. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 19 (1): 89-100.
24. Kiss, A. 2004. Is community-based ecoturism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds?. Trends Ecol Evol., 19 (5): 232-237.
25. Mansuroǧlu, S. 2008. Turizm gelişmelerine yerel halkin yaklaşimlarinin belirlenmesi: Akseki/Antalya örneǧi. Akdeniz Univ J Fac Agr., 19 (1): 35-46.
26. Menteş, İ. 1992. Altindere Vadisi Ulusal Parki uzun devreli gelişme planlamasina yönelik araştirmalar [M.Sc. Thesis], Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University.
27. Nepal, SK. 1997. Sustainable tourism, protected areas and livelihood needs of local communities in developing countries. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 4 (2): 123-135.
28. Parks for life. 1993. Report of the 4th World Congress on National Parks and Protected Areas, Gland: IUCN.
29. Ramade, F. 2003. Introductory conference: on the relevance of protected areas for the research on conservation ecology: from fundaments to applications. C. R. Biol., 326: S3-S8.
30. Rishi, P, Swati, M, Upadhyay, BK. 2008. Analysis of hierarchy of needs and motivational strategies for eco-development planning in two national parks of India. Resour Conserv Recy., 52: 707-718.
31. Sanderson, EW, Redford, KH, Vedder, A, Coppolillo, PB, Ward, SE. 2002. A conceptual model for conservation planning based on landscape species requirements. Landscape Urban Plan., 58: 41-56.
32. Sekhar, NU. 2003. Local people's attitudes towards conservation and wildlife tourism around Sariska. Tiger Reserve, India. J Environ Manage., 69: 339-347.
33. Soykan, A. 2009. Ecology-Based environmental education in years between 1999-2008 in protected areas of Turkey: aims and objectives, problems and suggestions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci., 1: 1704-1708.
34. Spelleberg, JF. 1995. " Evaluation and assessment of conservation ". In Conservation Biology 4 Series, Edited by: Goldsmith, FB. London: Chapmann and Hall.
35. Tan, B. 1999. Türk turizminin yapisal analizi ve 21. yüzyil başlarinda beklenen gelişmeler [Unpressed M.Sc. Thesis], Balikesir: Balikesir University.
36. Taşli, K, Özer, K, Yilmaz, K. 1999. Biostratigraphic and environmental analysis of the upper jurassic-lower cretaceous carbonate sequence in the Başoba Yayla area (Trabzon, Turkey). Turk J Earth Sci., 8: 125-135.
37. Taub, L. 2006. Preserving nature? Ecology, tourism and other themes in the National Parks. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci., 37: 602-611.
38. Thuy, NN, Dwivedi, P, Rossi, F, Alavalapati, JPR, Thapa, B. 2011. Role of social capital in determining conservation attitude: a case study from Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 18 (2): 143-153.
39. Trakolis, D. 1983. The social role of national parks-recreation and environmental education. Dasika Chronica, 5-6: 184-189.
40. Trakolis, D. 1984. Hunting in the area of the district forest office of Ioannina, NW Greece: a questionnaire survey among the hunters. Dasiki Erevna., 5 (1): 5-39.
41. Trakolis, D. 2001. Perceptions, preferences and reactions of local inhabitants in Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Environ Manage., 28 (5): 665-676.
42. Nations, United. 1992. United Nations Division for sustainable development Rio De Jenerio. 1992, Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development; Jun 3-14
43. URL-1. Yellowstone National Park, National Park Service. [Internet] [cited 2011 Aug 20]. http://www.nps.gov/yell
44. URL-2. Grand Canyon National Park, National Park Sevice. [Internet] [cited 2011 Aug 20]. http://www.nps.gov/grca
45. URL-3. General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks. [Internet] [cited 2012 Mar 8]. http://www.milliparklar.gov.tr/mp/ altinderevadisi/index.htm
46. URL-4. Deprem Bölgeleri Haritasi, T.C. Başbakanlik Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanliǧi. [Internet] [cited 2011 Feb 10]. http://www.deprem.gov.tr/sarbis/shared/depremharitalari.aspx
47. URL-5. Adrese Dayali Nüfus Kayit Sistemi (ADNKS) Sonuçlari. [Internet] [cited 2011 Feb 10]. http://tuikapp.tuik.gov.tr/adnksdagitapp/adnks. zul
48. URL-6. Türkiye'deki Son Deprem Etkinlikleri, Boǧaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştirma Enstitüsü. [Internet] [cited 2009 Mar 21]. http://www.koeri.boun.edu. tr/sismo/map/tr/oneyear.html
49. Visseren-Hamakers, I, Glasbergen, P. 2007. Partnerships in forestry. Global Env Change., 17 (3-4): 408-419.
50. Welss, M, Brandon, K. 1990. People and parks: linking protected area management with local communities, Washington, DC: The World Bank, World Fund and U.S. Agency for International Development.
51. Xu, J, Lue, Y, Chen, L, Liu, Y. 2009. Contribution of tourism development to protected area management: local stakeholder perspectives. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol., 16 (1): 30-36.
52. Yaşar, O, Şeremet, M. 2008. National park education in Turkey and a research regarding national park education: Gallipoli Peninsula Historical National Park. J Int Soc Res., 1 (5): 910-942.
53. Yüksek, T, Cengiz, T, Yüksek, F. 2008. Doǧal alanlarda festival etkinliklerinin koruma-kullanma açisindan deǧ erlendirilmesi: kafkasör kültür, sanat ve turizm festivali örneǧi. J Ecol, 17 (67): 37-45.
54. Zafer, B. 1991. Türkiye'de doǧa koruma alanlari ve doǧal sitlerin belirleme ve siniflandirilmasinda kullanilacak kriterlerin saptanasi amaciyla İzmir/Kemalpaşa örneklemesine dayali yöntem araştirmasi [Ph.D. Thesis], İzmir: Ege University.