Partnerships in forest governance

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 17, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 408-419

  Visseren Hamakers, Ingrid J ^a   Glasbergen, Pieter ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Certification; Forest; Governance; Partnerships

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CERTIFICATION; CIVIL SOCIETY; DEFORESTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT; LEGISLATIVE IMPLEMENTATION; PARTNERSHIP APPROACH; PRIVATIZATION;

EID: 34548531772     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abusow, 2005. Canada-wide-SFM-Certification Status Report, Abusow International Ltd. for the Canadian Sustainable Forestry Certification Coalition. December 20, 2005.
2. AFP, 2005. Announcement on Organizational Matters and Decision-Making Mechanisms to Strengthen the Asia Forest Partnership (AFP), Asia Forest Partnership. November 15, 2005.
3. Arts B. 'Green alliances' of business and NGOs; new styles of self-regulation or 'dead-end-roads'?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 9 (2002) 26-36
4. Bryant D., Nielsen D., and Tangley L. The Last Frontier Forests: Ecosystems and Economies on the Edge (1997), World Resources Institute
5. Bulte E.H., and Barbier E.B. Trade and renewable resources in a second best world: an overview. Environmental & Resource Economics 30 (2005) 423-463
6. Cashore B. Legitimacy and the privatisation of environmental governance: how non-state market-driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 15 (2002) 503-529
7. Cashore B., Auld G., and Newsom D. Governing Through Markets. Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority (2004), Yale University Press, New Haven, London
8. COMIFAC, 2005. Traite relatif à la Conservation et à la Gestion Durable des Ecosystèmes Forestiers d'Afrique Centrale, February 2005.
9. Commission, 2003. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT). Proposal for an EU action plan, Commission of the European Communities. May 21, 2003. COM (2003) 251 final.
10. CSA. CSA-Z809-2002-Summary of Key Changes in the Revised 2002 Standard (2002), Canadian Standards Association
11. CSA. CSA Standard Z809-02. Sustainable Forest Management: Requirements and Guidelines (2002), Canadian Standards Association
12. In: Cutler A.C., Haufler V., and Porter T. (Eds). Private Authority and International Affairs (1999), State University of New York Press, New York
13. Denmark. Purchasing Tropical Timber. Environmental guidelines (2003), Danish Ministry of the Environment
14. Dyke J., Cash S.B., Brody S.D., and Thornton S. Examining the role of the forest industry in collaborative ecosystem management: implications for corporate strategy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 12 (2005) 10-18
15. EP, 2005. European Parliament resolution on speeding up implementation of the EU action plan on Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT). European Parliament. July 4 2005. B6-0412/2005.
16. Falkner R. Private environmental governance and international relations: exploring the links. Global Environmental Politics 3 (2003) 72-87
17. FoE. Greasy Palms-Palm Oil, The Environment and Big Business (2003), Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland
18. FSC, 1996. FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC-STD-01-001 (version 4-0).
19. FSC, 2005a. FSC By-Laws, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC By-Laws (Document 1.1).
20. FSC, 2005b. FSC Statutes, Forest Stewardship Council. A.C. FSC Statutes (Document 1.3).
21. FSC, 2006. Clarification regarding the relationship between FSC and MTCC, Forest Stewardship Council. September 13, 2006.
22. Glasbergen P., and Driessen P.P.J. In: Driessen P.P.J., and Glasbergen P. (Eds). Greening Society. The Paradigm Shift in Dutch Environmental Politics (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 3-25
23. Glastra R., Wakker E., and Richert W. Oil Palm Plantations and Deforestation in Indonesia. What Role Do Europe and Germany Play? (2002), AIDEnvironment for WWF Switzerland, Switzerland
24. Graf Lambsdorff, J., 2004. Corruption Perceptions Index 2004. University of Passau for Transparancy International. October 20, 2004.
25. Greenpeace. Missing Links. Why the Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC) Certificate Doesn't Prove That MTCC Timber is Legal Nor Sustainable (2005), Greenpeace International
26. Gulbrandsen L.H. Mark of sustainability? Challenges for fishery and forestry eco-labeling. Environment 47 (2005) 8-23
27. Humphreys D. The global politics of forest conservation since the UNCED. Environmental Politics 5 (1996) 231-256
28. Jessop B. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: the case of economic development. International Social Science Journal 155 (1998) 29-45
29. In: Kooiman J. (Ed). Modern governance. New Government-Society Interactions (1993), Sage Publications, London
30. Kooiman J. Governing as Governance (2003), Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi
31. Meng Chuo, W., 2004. A Report on the Malaysian Timber Certification Scheme, IDEAL.
32. MTCC, 2004a. Annual report. Malaysian Timber Certification Council.
33. MTCC. Malaysian Criteria and Indicators for Forest Management Certification (2004), Malaysian Timber Certification Council, Malaysia
34. MTCC, 2006. Malaysian Timber Certification Council. Website.
35. Nelissen N. The administrative capacity of new types of governance. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal 2 (2002) 5-22
36. NTTA. Good prospects for timber. Policy plan NTTA 2003-2005 (2002), Netherlands Timber Trade Association, The Netherlands
37. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
38. Ozinga, S., 2004. Footprints in the forest. Current practice and future challenges in forest certification, FERN.
39. Pattberg P.H. The forest stewardship council: risk and potential of private forest governance. The Journal of Environment & Development 14 (2005) 356-374
40. PEFC, 2005a. Annual Review. Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes.
41. PEFC, 2005b. PEFC Council Technical Document, Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes. October 28, 2005.
42. Rametsteiner E. The role of governments in forest certification-a normative analysis based on new institutional economics theories. Forest Policy and Economics 4 (2002) 163-173
43. Rhone G.T., Clarke D., and Webb K. In: Webb K. (Ed). Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (2004), Carlton University, Ottawa 249-272
44. Richert, W., 2003. Onderzoek en beleidsmatig advies. Illegaal hout. De verantwoordelijkheden en de mogelijkheden voor Nederland binnen de internationale context. AIDEnvironment for Greenpeace Netherlands, NC-IUCN, ICCO, Milieudefensie, WNF. June 2003.
45. Ronit K., and Schneider V. Global governance through private organizations. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 12 (1999) 243-266
46. In: Rosenau J.N., Czempiel E., et al. (Eds). Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, USA
47. RSPO, 2005. RSPO Criteria for Sustainable Palm Oil. Public release version, Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. October 17, 2005.
48. RTRS, 2005. Common Basis for the Round Table on Responsible Soy (RTRS), Round Table on Responsible Soy.
49. RTRS, 2006. Asunción. Declaration (Draft for discussion). Round Table on Responsible Soy. September 1, 2006.
50. Saurin J. Global environmental crisis as the 'Disaster Triumphant': the private capture of public goods. Environmental Politics 10 (2001) 63-84
51. SFB, 2005. Sustainable Forestry Initiative program: overview, governance, and historical information. 2005-2009 SFI Standard Overview. Sustainable Forestry Board.
52. SFI, 2002. 2002-2004 Edition Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) Program, The Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Sustainable Forestry Board, and the American Forest & Paper Association (AF & PA).
53. SFI, 2004. Sustainable Forestry Initiative Standard (SFIS), The Sustainable Forestry Initiative, Sustainable Forestry Board, and the American Forest & Paper Association (AF & PA).
54. SFI, 2005a. Summary of Significant Changes in the 2005-2009 Sustainable Forestry Initiative Standard (SFIS) and Audit Procedures and Qualifications (APQ), Sustainable Forestry Board.
55. SFI, 2005b. 11th Annual Progress Report. Sustainable Forestry Initiative.
56. Siry J.P., Cubbage F.W., and Ahmed M.R. Sustainable forest management: global trends and opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 551-561
57. Stoker G. Governance as theory: five propositions. International Social Science Journal 155 (1998) 17-27
58. Taylor P.J. New political geographies: global civil society and global governance through world city networks. Political Geography 24 (2005) 703-730
59. UK, 2004. UK Government timber procurement policy. Assessment of Five Certification Schemes. CPET phase 1 final report. UK Government. November 2004.
60. Underdal A. In: Miles E.L. (Ed). Environmental Regime Effectiveness. Confronting Theory with Evidence (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 3-45
61. UNECE and FAO, 2005. Press release: Governments-significant actors for certification of sustainable forest management: UNECE/FAO policy forum reviews roles of governments. Timber Committee, Economic Commission for Europe and the European Forestry Commission, Food and Agricultural Organization. October 4, 2005.
62. Wakker E. Greasy palms-The Social and Ecological Impacts of Large-Scale Oil Palm Plantation Development in Southeast Asia (2005), AIDEnvironment for Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland
63. Watson, R.T., Zinyowera, M.C., Moss, R.H., (Eds.), 1995. Climate change 1995. Impacts, adaptions and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
64. WRI, 2004. Earth Trends Data Tables: Forests, Grasslands, and Drylands. World Resources Institute.
65. WWF, 2005. World Bank-WWF Alliance Annual Report 2004. World Wide Fund for Nature.
66. Young O.R. In: Ostrom E., et al. (Ed). The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academy Press, USA 263-291
67. Dros, J.M., 2005. AIDEnvironment, 8 August.
68. Somé, L., 2005. WWF-CARPO, 7 September.
69. Verbelen, F., 2005. Greenpeace, Belgium, 8 August.