Phenomenological aspects of hypnotic interactions: The effect of kinship

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 401-415

  Varga, Katalin ^a   Bányai, Éva I ^a   Gsi Greguss, Anna C ^a   Tauszik, Katalin ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSANGUINITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIZYGOTIC TWINS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EROTISM; FEMALE; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; INTIMACY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; PHENOMENOLOGY;

ADULT; AFFECT; AWARENESS; DISSOCIATIVE DISORDERS; FAMILY; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; IMAGINATION; MALE; PARENTS; PHENOTYPE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SIBLINGS; TWINS, DIZYGOTIC; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 84883522476     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2013.810476     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., and, Wall, S. 1978. Patterns of attachment, Assessed in the strange situation and at home, Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.
2. Argyle, M., and, Dean, J. 1965. Eye-contact, distance, and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
3. Baker, E. L. 2000. Reflections on the hypnotic relationship. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 48, 56-69.
4. Baker, E. L., and, Levitt, E. E. 1989. The hypnotic relationship, An investigation of compliance and resistance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 145-153.
5. Bányai, É. I. 1985. A social psychological approach to the understanding of hypnosis, The interaction between hypnotist and subject. Hypnos-Swedish Journal of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, 12, 186-210.
6. Bányai, É. I. 1991. " Toward a social psychobiological model of hypnosis ". In Theories of hypnosis current models and perspectives, Edited by, Lynn, S. J. and Rhue, J. W. 564-601. New York, NY, Guilford.
7. Bányai, É. I. 1998. The interactive nature of hypnosis, Research evidence for a social-psychobiological model. Contemporary Hypnosis, 15 (1), 52-63.
8. Bányai, É. I. 2002a. " Communication in different styles of hypnosis ". In Issues on hypnosis, Edited by, Hoogduin, C. A. L., Schaap, C. P. D. R. and de Berk, H. A. A. 1-19. Nijmegen, The Netherlands, Cure & Care.
9. Bányai, É. I. 2002b. " Hypnosis and mainstream psychology ". In Munich 2000, The 15th International Congress of Hypnosis-Hypnosis international Monographs Number 6, Edited by, Peter, B., Bongartz, W., Revenstorf, D. and Butollo, W. 1-13. Munich, Germany, MEG Stiftung.
10. Bányai, É. I., Gsi-Greguss, A. C., Vágó, P., Varga, K., and, Horváth, R. 1990. " Interactional approach to the understanding of hypnosis, Theoretical background and main findings. In R. Van Dyck, Ph ". In Hypnosis, Current theory, research and practice, Edited by, Spinhoven, A. J. W., Van der Does, Y. R., Rood, Van and DeMoor, W. 53-69. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Free University Press.
11. Bányai, É. I., Józsa, E., Métneki, J., Gsi-Greguss, A. C., and, Varga, K. August 2006. Heritability of hypnotic susceptibility, A twin study, August, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy.
12. Barabasz, A. F., and, Watkins, J. G. 2005. Hypnotherapeutic techniques, 2nd, New York, NY, Brunner-Routledge.
13. Bowers, K. S. 1981. Do the Stanford scales tap the "classic suggestion effect"?. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42-53.
14. Bowers, K. S. 1992. Imaginative and dissociative control in hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 253-275.
15. Bowlby, J. 1980. Attachment and loss, Sadness and depression, Vol. 3, New York, NY, Basic Books.
16. Burgoon, J. K., Stern, L. A., and, Dillman, L. 1995. Interpersonal adaptation, Dyadic interaction patterns, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
17. Diamond, M. J. 1984. It takes two to tango, Some thoughts on the neglected importance of the hypnotist in an interactive hypnotherapeutic relationship. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 3-13.
18. Diamond, M. J. 1987. The interactional basis of hypnotic experience, On the relational dimensions of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 95-115.
19. Farthing, G. W. 1992. The psychology of consciousness, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
20. Fourie, D. P. 1983. Width of the hypnotic relationship, An interactional view of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnotic depth. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11, 1-14.
21. Foy, A. K., Vernon, P., and, Jang, K. 2001. Examining the dimensions of intimacy in twin and peer relationships. Twin Research, 4, 443-452.
22. Fromm, E., Brown, D. P., Hurt, S. W., Oberlander, J. Z., Boxer, A. M., and, Pfeifer, G. 1981. The phenomena and characteristics of self-hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 189-246.
23. Haley, J. 1958. An interactional explanation of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1, 41-57.
24. Hilgard, J. R. 1970. Personality and hypnosis, A study of imaginative involvement, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press.
25. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., and, Cummings, J. 1996. Trait factors, state effects and hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 232-249.
26. Levitt, E. E., and, Baker, E. L. 1983. The hypnotic relationship-Another look at coercion, compliance, and resistance, A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 125-131.
27. Lichtenberg, P., Bachner-Melman, R., Ebstein, R. P., and, Crawford, H. J. 2004. Hypnotic susceptibility, Multidimensional relationships with Cloninger's Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire, COMT polymorphisms, absorption, and attentional characteristics. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 47-72.
28. Lichtenberg, P., Bachner-Melman, R., Gritsenko, I., and, Ebstein, R. P. 2000. Exploratory association study between catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) high/low enzyme activity polymorphism and hypnotizability. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 96, 771-774.
29. Ludwig, A. M. 1972. " Altered states of consciousness ". In Altered states of consciousness, Edited by, Tart, C. T. 11-24. New York, NY, Anchor Book Doubleday.
30. Ludwig, A. M. 1983. The psychobiological functions of dissociation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 26, 93-99.
31. Lynn, S. J., and, Rhue, J. W., eds. 1991. Theories of hypnosis current models and perspectives, New York, NY, Guilford.
32. Lynn, S. J., Weekes, J. R., Neufeld, V., Zivney, O., Brentar, J., and, Weiss, F. 1991. Interpersonal climate and hypnotizability level, Effects on hypnotic performance, rapport, and archaic involvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 739-743.
33. Martin, T. O., and, Gross, R. B. 1979. A comparison of twins for degree of closeness and field dependency. Adolescence, 14, 739-745.
34. Morgan, A. H. 1973. The heritability of hypnotic susceptibility in twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 55-61.
35. Morgan, A. H., Hilgard, E. R., and, Davert, E. C. 1970. The heritability of hypnotic susceptibility of twins, A preliminary report. Behavioral Genetics, 1, 213-223.
36. Nash, M. R. 1991. " Hypnosis as a special case of psychological regression ". In Theories of hypnosis current models and perspectives, Edited by, Lynn, S. J. and Rhue, J. W. 171-194. New York, NY, Guilford.
37. Nash, M. R., and, Spinler, D. 1989. Hypnosis and transference, A measure of archaic involvement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 129-143.
38. Orne, M. T. 1959. The nature of hypnosis, Artifact and essence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 277-299.
39. Patterson, M. L. 1976. An arousal model of interpersonal intimacy. Psychological Review, 83, 235-245.
40. Pekala, R. J., and, Kumar, V. K. 1989. Phenomenological patterns of consciousness during hypnosis, Relevance to cognition and individual differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 1-20.
41. Pekala, R. J., and, Nagler, R. 1989. The assessment of hypnoidal states, Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231-236.
42. Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J., and, Kumar, V. K. 1986. Measurement of phenomenological experience, Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
43. Perry, C. W., and, Sheehan, P. W. 1978. Aptitude for trance and situational effects of varying the interpersonal nature of the hypnosis setting. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20, 256-262.
44. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., and, Zimbardo, P. G. 1989. On the stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review, 57, 289-295.
45. Raz, A. 2005. Attention and hypnosis, Neural substrates and genetic associations of two converging processes. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 237-258.
46. Raz, A., Fan, J., and, Posner, M. I. 2006. Neuroimaging and genetic associations of attentional and hypnotic processes. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 99, 483-491.
47. Sheehan, P. W. 1980. Factors influencing rapport in hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 263-281.
48. Sheehan, P. W. 1991. " Hypnosis, context, and commitment ". In Theories of hypnosis current models and perspectives, Edited by, Lynn, S. J. and Rhue, J. W. 520-541. New York, NY, Guilford.
49. Sheehan, P. W., and, Dolby, R. M. 1979. Motivated involvement in hypnosis, The illustration of clinical rapport through hypnotic dream. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 573-583.
50. Sheehan, P. W., and, McConkey, K. M. 1982. Hypnosis and experience, The exploration of phenomena and process, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
51. Szekely, A., Kovacs-Nagy, R., Bányai, É. I., Gsi-Greguss, A. C., Varga, K., and, Halmai, Z. 2010. Association between hypnotizability and the Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) polymorphism. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58, 301-315. Sasvari-Szekely, M
52. Tancredy, C. M., and, Fraley, R. C. 2006. The nature of adult twin relationship, An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 78-93.
53. Tart, C. T. 1972. Altered states of consciousness, New York, NY, Anchor Book Doubleday.
54. Tauszik, K., Bányai, É. I., Varga, K., Gsi-Greguss, A. C., and, Józsa, E. August 2006. The patterns of archaic involvement and the degree of kinship, August, Acapulco, Mexico, Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Hypnosis and Hypnotherapy.
55. Vaitl, D., Birbaumer, N., Gruzelier, J. H., Jamieson, G. A., Kotchoubey, B., and, Kubler, A. 2005. Psychobiology of altered states of consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 98-127. Weiss, T
56. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. 1994. Parallel application of the experiential analysis technique with subject and hypnotist, A new possibility for measuring interactional synchrony. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42, 130-139.
57. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. August 1996. Harmony in phenomenology, A new way to measure interactional synchrony, August, Budapest, Hungary, Paper presented at the 7th European Congress of Hypnosis.
58. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. June 1997. New ways of characterizing the phenomenological aspect of rapport, June, San Diego, California, Paper presented at the 14th International Congress of Hypnosis.
59. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. 1999. Hypnotists' phenomenology, Toward the understanding of hypnotic interactions. Hypnos, 26, 181-193.
60. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. October 2000. Transference and countertransference in experimental hypnotic settings, October, Munich, Invited paper presented at the 15th International Congress of Hypnosis.
61. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. 2006. A new way of characterizing hypnotic interactions, Dyadic Interactional Harmony (DIH) questionnaire. Contemporary Hypnosis, 23, 151-166.
62. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., and, Gsi-Greguss, A. C. 2009. " Patterns of interactional harmony, The phenomenology of hypnosis interaction ". In Hypnosis theories, research and applications Edited by, Koester, G. D. and Delisle, P. R. 53-98. New York, NY, Nova Science
63. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., Gsi-Greguss, A. C., and, Kumar, V. K. 2001. Phenomenological experiences associated with hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 49, 19-29.
64. Weitzenhoffer, A. M. 1978. " Hypnotism and altered states of consciousness ". In Expanding dimensions of consciousness, Edited by, Sugarman, A. and Tarter, R. E. 183-225. New York, NY, Springer.
65. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., and, Hilgard, E. R. 1959. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B, Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists.
66. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., and, Hilgard, E. R. 1962. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms C, Palo Alto, CA, Consulting Psychologists.