Patterns of interactional harmony: The phenomenology of hypnosis interaction

Hypnosis: Theories, Research and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 53-98

  Varga, Katalin ^a   Józsa, Emese ^a   Bányai, Éva I ^a   Gosi Greguss, Anna C ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053535120     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (129)

1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., and Wall, S. (1978) Patterns of Attachment: Assessed in the Strange Situation and at Home. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
2. Argyle, M., and Dean, J. (1965). Eye-Contact, Distance, and Affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
3. Baker, E. L., (1987) The State of the Art of Clinical Hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 203-214.
4. Baker, E. L. and Levitt, E.E. (1989) The Hypnotic Relationship: An Investigation of Compliance and Resistance. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37(2), 145-153.
5. Bányai, É. I. (1980) A New Way to Induce a Hypnotic-Like Altered State of Consciousness: Active-Alert Induction. In L. Kardos, and C. Pléh (Eds.) Problems of the Regulation of Activity (pp. 261-273). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
6. Bányai, É. I. (1985) A Social Psychophysiological Approach to the Understanding of Hypnosis: The Interaction Between Hypnotist and Subject. Hypnos, 12, 186-210.
7. Bányai, É. I. (1991) Toward a Social-Psychobiological Model of Hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn, and J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives (pp. 564-598). New York, London: Guilford Press.
8. Bányai, É.I. (1995). Nature of Rapport in Hypnosis: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results. Invited Address presented at the 2nd European Congress of Ericksonian Hypnosis and Psychotherapy. Munich, Germany, October 3-7, 1995.
9. Bányai, É. I. (1998) The Interactive Nature of Hypnosis: Research Evidence for a Social-Psychobiological model. Contemporary Hypnosis, 15(1), 52-63.
10. Bányai, É. I. (2002a) Hypnosis and Mainstream Psychology. In B. Peter, W. Bongartz, D. Revenstorf, and W. Butollo (Eds.) Hypnosis International Monographs Number 6 (pp. 1-13). Munich: MEG Stiftung.
11. Bányai, É. I. (2002b) Communication in Different Styles of Hypnosis. In C. A. L. Hoogduin, C. P. D. R. Schaap, and H. A. A. de Berk (Eds.) Issues on Hypnosis (pp. 1-19). Nijmegen: Cure and Care Publishers.
12. Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Vágó, P., Varga, K., and Horváth, R. (1990) Interactional Approach to the Understanding of Hypnosis: Theoretical Background and Main Findings. In R. Van Dyck, Ph. Spinhoven, A. J. W. Van der Does, Y. R. Van Rood, and W. De Moor (Eds.) Hypnosis: Current Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 53-69). Amsterdam: Free University Press.
13. Bányai, É.I. and Hilgard, E. (1976). A Comparison of Active-Alert Hypnotic Induction with Traditional Relaxation Induction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85(2), 218-224.
14. Bányai, É. I., Mészáros, I., and Csókay, L. (1982) Interaction Between Hypnotist and Subject: A Social Psychophysiological Approach. Abstract. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 193.
15. Bányai, É. I., Mészáros, I., and Csókay, L. (1985) Interaction Between Hypnotist and Subject: A Social Psychophysiological Approach. (Preliminary report). In D. Waxman, P. C. Misra, M. Gibson, and M. A. Basker (Eds.) Modern Trends in Hypnosis (pp. 97-108). New York, London: Plenum Press.
16. Bernieri, F. J., Gillis, J. S, Davis, J. M, and Grahe, J. E. (1996). Dyad Rapport and Accuracy of Its Judgment Across Situations: A Lens Model Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 110-129.
17. Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the Stanford Scales Tap the "Classic Suggestion Effect?" International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42-53.
18. Bowers, K. S. (1992). Imaginative and Dissociative Control in Hypnotic Responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 253-275.
19. Bowers, K. S. (1998). Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C. Manual and response booklet. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 46(3): 250-268.
20. Bowlby, J. (1980) Attachment and Loss: Sadness and Depression, Volume III. New York: Basic Books.
21. Brown, D. P. and Fromm, E. (1986) Hypnotherapy and Hypnoanalysis. Hillsdale, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
22. Burgoon, J. K, Stern, L. A, and Dillman, L. (1995). Interpersonal Adaptation. Dyadic interaction patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Capella, J.N. (1997) Behavioral and Judged Coordination in Adult Informal Social Interactions: Vocal and Kinesic Indicators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 119-131.
24. Coe, W.C., and Sarbin, T.R. (1977) Hypnosis From the Standpoint of a Contextualist. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 296, 2-13.
25. Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
26. de Groot, H. P., Gwynn, M. I., and Spanos, N. P. (1988) The Effects of Contextual Information and Gender on the Prediction of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1049-1053.
27. Diamond, M. J. (1984) It Takes Two to Tango: Some Thoughts on the Neglected Importance of the Hypnotist in an Interactive Hypnotherapeutic Relationship. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 3-13.
28. Diamond, M. J. (1986) Hypnotically Augmented Psychotherapy: The Unique Contributions of the Hypnotically Trained Clinician. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 28(4), 238-246.
29. Diamond, M. J. (1987) The Interactional Basis of Hypnotic Experience: On the Relational Dimensions of Hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 95-115.
30. Eisen, M. R., and Fromm, E. (1983). The Clinical Use of Self-Hypnosis in Hypnotherapy: Tapping the Functions of Imagery and Adaptive Regression. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 243-255.
31. Engelbrecht, G., Arnold, S. A., and Eraschky, P. (1987). The Mutual Rorschach in the Interaction-Diagnosis. In M. Cierpka (ed) Family Diagnosis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Farthing, G. W. (1992). The Psychology of Consciousness. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
33. Ferenczi, S. (1909/1965). Comments on Hypnosis. Trans. Jones, E. In R. E. Shor, and M. T. Orne (eds.) The Nature of Hypnosis: Selected Basic Readings (pp. 177-178). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34. Field, P. B. (1965). An Inventory of Hypnotic Depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 238-249.
35. Fourie, D. P. (1983) Width of the Hypnotic Relationship: An Interactional View of Hypnotic Susceptibility and Hypnotic Depth. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11, 1-14.
36. Frankel, F. H. (1987) Significant Developments in Medical Hypnosis During the Past 25 Years. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 231-247.
37. Fromm, E. (1977) An ego-psychological theory of altered states of consciousness, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 25, 372-387.
38. Fromm, E. (1987) Significant Developments in Clinical Hypnosis During the Past 25 Years. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 215-230.
39. Fromm, E., Brown, D. P., Hurt, S. W., Oberlander, J. Z., Boxer, A. M., and Pfeifer, G. (1981). The Phenomena and Characteristics of Self-Hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 189-246.
40. Fromm, E., Lombard, L., Skinner, S. H., and Kahn, S. (1987-88). The Modes of the Ego in Self-Hypnosis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7(4), 335-349.
41. Gill, M. M. and Brenman, M. (1959) Hypnosis and Related States. New York: International Universities.
42. Gosi-Greguss, A. C. (2002) Acoustic Analysis of the Hypnotist's Voice-a preliminary study. In B. Peter, W. Bongartz, D. Revenstorf, and W. Butollo (Eds.) Hypnosis International Monographs Number 6 (pp. 129-136). Munich: MEG Stiftung.
43. Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Bányai, É. I., Józsa, E., Suhai-Hodász, G., and Varga, K. (2004): Voice Analysis of Hypnotists. Grazer Linguistische Studien, 62, 27-35.
44. Gosi-Greguss, A.C., Bányai, É.I., and Varga, K. (1996) Verbal and Paraverbal Communication in "Standard" Hypnoses. In Eurohypnosis'96: 7th European Congress of Hypnosis, Budapest, August 17-23. Book of Abstracts. 58.
45. Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Bányai, É. I., Varga, K., and Horváth, R. J. (1992) Slip of the Tongue -Slip of Hypnosis? Abstract. In The Book of Abstracts of the 12th International Congress of Hypnosis, Jerusalem, Israel, July 25-31. 1992.
46. Gravitz, M. A. (1991) Early Theories of Hypnosis: A Clinical Perspective. In S. J. Lynn, and J. W. Rhue (Eds): Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives (pp. 19-42). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
47. Haley, J. (1958). An Interactional Explanation of Hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1, 41-57.
48. Hammond, D.C. (1991) (ed.) Handbook of Hypnotic Suggestions and Metaphores. New York, London: Norton Company.
49. Hilgard, E. R. (1962) Impulsive Versus Realistic Thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 59(6), 477-488.
50. Hilgard, E. R. (1976) Neodissociation Theory of Multiple Cognitive Control Systems. In: G. E. Schwartz, and D. Shapiro (eds.) Consciousness and Self Regulation. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.
51. Hilgard, E. R. (1977\79) Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
52. Hilgard, E. R. (1987) Research Advances in Hypnosis: Issues and Methods. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 248-264.
53. Hilgard, E. R. (1968) The Experience of Hypnosis. New York: Horcourt Brance and World Inc.
54. Hilgard, J.R. (1979) Personality and hypnosis. A study of imaginative involvement, Second edition. Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.
55. Horváth, R. J., Bányai, É. I., Varga, K., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Vágó, P. (1988) Interactional Approach to the Understanding of Hypnosis: Relational dimensions. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress of Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine, Leiden, The Netherlands, August 1988.
56. Kahn, S. P., Fromm, E, Lombard, L. S., and Sossi, M. (1989). The Relation of Self-Reports of Hypnotic Depth in Self-Hypnosis to Hypnotizability and Imagery Production. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 290-304.
57. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., and Cummings, J. (1996). Trait Factors, State Effects and Hypnotizability. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 232-249.
58. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., and McCloskey, M. (1999). Phenomenological State Effects During Hypnosis: A Cross-Validation of Findings. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16(1), 9-22.
59. Lazar, B. S. and Dempster, C. R. (1984) Operator Variables in Successful Hypnotherapy, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 32(1), 28-40.
60. Levitt, E. E., and Baker, E. L. (1983) The Hypnotic Relationship - Another Look at Coercion, Compliance, and Resistance: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 125-131.
61. Lombard, L. S., Kahn, S. P., and Fromm, E. (1990). The Role of Imagery in Self-Hypnosis: Its Relationship to Personality Characteristics and Gender. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 25-38.
62. Loveland, N. T., Wynne, L., and Singer, M. T. (1963). The Family Rorschach: A New Method for Studying Family Interaction. Family Process, 2, 187-215.
63. Lynn, S. J., and Rhue, J. W. (1991) (Eds.): Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
64. Lynn, S. J., and Rhue, J. W. (1991) An Integrative Model of Hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn and J. W. Rhue (Eds.): Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives (pp. 397-438). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
65. Ludwig, A. M (1972). Altered States of Consciousness. In C. T. Tart (ed) Altered States of Consciousness (pp. 9-22). New York: John Wiley.
66. Ludwig, A. M. (1983) The Psychobiological Function of Dissociation. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 26(2), 93-99.
67. Maitz, E. A., and Pekala, R. J. (1991). Phenomenological Quantification of an Out-Of-The Body Experience with a Near Death Event. Omega, 22(3), 199-214.
68. Matheson, G., Shue, K.L. and Bart, C. (1989) A validation study of a short-form hypnotic-experience questionnaire and its relationship to hypnotizability, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 32, 17-26.
69. Maurer, R. L., Sr., Kumar, V. K., Woodside, L., and Pekala, R. J. (1997). Phenomenological experience in response to drumming and hypnotizability. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, 130-144.
70. Morgan, A. H. (1973) The Heritability of Hypnotic Susceptibility in Twins. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 55-61.
71. Morgan, A. H., and Hilgard, J. R. (1975). Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale. In E. R Hilgard and J. R. Hilgard (Eds.) Hypnosis in the Relief of Pain (Appendix A, pp. 209-221). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufmann.
72. Morgan, A. H., Hilgard, E. R., and Davert, E. C. (1970) The Heritability of Hypnotic Susceptibility of Twins: A Preliminary Report. Behavioral Genetics, 1(3/4):213-223.
73. Nash, M. R. (1991) Hypnosis as a Special Case of Psychological Regression. In S. J. Lynn, and J. W. Rhue (Eds.): Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives (pp. 171-194). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
74. Nash, M. R. and Lynn, S. J. (1986) Child Abuse and Hypnotic Ability. Imagery, Cognition and Personality, 5, 211-218.
75. Nash, M. R., and Spinler, D. (1989) Hypnosis and Transference: A Measure of Archaic Involvement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 37, 129-143.
76. Orne, M.T. (1959) The Nature of Hypnosis: Artifact and Essence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 277-299.
77. Patterson, M.L. (1976) An Arousal Model of Interpersonal Intimacy. Psychological Review, 83(3), 235-245.
78. Pekala, R. J. (1980). An Empirical-Phenomenological Approach for Mapping Consciousness and Its Various "States." Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan state University (University Microfilm No. 82-02, 489).
79. Pekala, R. J. (1982). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Thorndale, PA: Psychophenomenological Concepts (Now published by the Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute. see 1991a).
80. Pekala, R. J. (1991a). The Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Thorndale, PA: West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
81. Pekala, R. J. (1991b). Quantifying Consciousness: An Empirical Approach. New York: Plenum.
82. Pekala, R. J., and Ersek, B. (1992-93). Firewalking Versus Hypnosis: A Preliminary Study Concerning Consciousness, Attention, and Fire Immunity. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 12, 284-293.
83. Pekala, R. J., and Forbes, E. J. (1988). Hypnoidal Effects Associated with Several Stress Management Techniques. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 16, 121-132.
84. Pekala, R. J., and Kumar, V. K. (1989). Phenomenological Patterns of Consciousness During Hypnosis: Relevance to Cognition and Individual Differences. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 1-20.
85. Pekala, R. J., Steinberg, J. and Kumar, V. K. (1986). Measurement of Phenomenological Experience: Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 983-989.
86. Perry, C.W. and Sheehan, P.W. (1978) Aptitude for Trance and Situational Effects of Varying the Interpersonal Nature of the Hypnosis Setting. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 20(4), 256-262.
87. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E. R., and Zimbardo, P. G. (1989). On the Stability of Measured Hypnotizability Over a 25 Year Period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Review, 57, 289-295.
88. Rogers, C.R. (1979) The Foundation of the Person-Centered Approach. Manuscript.
89. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
90. Scagnelli, J. (1980) Hypnotherapy With Psychotic and Borderline Patient: The Use of Trance by Patient and Therapist. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22(3), 164-169.
91. Sheehan, P. W. (1980) Factors Influencing Rapport in Hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 263-281.
92. Sheehan, P. W. (1982-83) Imaginative Consciousness - Function, Process and Method. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 2, 177-194.
93. Sheehan, P. W. (1991). Hypnosis, Context, and Commitment. In S. J. Lynn, and J. W. Rhue (eds) Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives (pp. 520-541). New York, London: The Guilford Press.
94. Sheehan, P.W. and Dolby, R.M. (1979) Motivated Involvement in Hypnosis: The Illustration of Clinical Rapport Through Hypnotic Dream. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88(5), 573-583.
95. Sheehan, P. W., and McConkey, K. M. (1982) Hypnosis and Experience: The Exploration of Phenomena and Process. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
96. Sheehan, P.W., McConkey, K.M., and Cross, D. (1978) Experiential Analysis of Hypnosis: Some New Observations on Hypnotic Phenomena. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87, 570-575.
97. Shor, R. E. (1959) Hypnosis and the concept of the generalized reality-orientation. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 13, 582-602.
98. Shor, R. E. (1962) Three Dimensions of Hypnotic Depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 10, 23-38.
99. Shor, R. E., and Orne, E. C. (1963). Norms on the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 11, 39-47.
100. Spanos, N.P. (1986). Hypnosis and the Modification of Hypnotic Susceptibility: A Social Psychological Perspective. In P. Naish (Ed.) What is Hypnosis? (pp. 85-120). London: Open University Press.
101. Spanos, N. P., Gabora, N. J., Jarrett, L. E., and Gwynn, M. I. (1989) Contextual Determinants of Hypnotizability and of Relationships Between Hypnotizability Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(2):271-278.
102. Spanos, N. P., Kennedy, S. K., and Gwynn, M. I. (1984) Moderating Effects of Contextual Variables on the Relationship Between Hypnotic Susceptibility and Suggested Analgesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93(3):285-294.
103. Spinhoven, P., Vanderlinden, J., Ter Kuile, M. M., and Linssen, C. G. (1993). Assessment of Hypnotic Processes and Responsiveness in a Clinical Context. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 210-223.
104. Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for Comparing Elements of a Correlation Matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245-251.
105. Szabó, Cs. (1989). Szubjektív élmények különbözo indukciós technikákkal létrehozott hipnózisokban [Subjective experiences induced by various hypnosis techniques]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen, Hungary.
106. Szabó, Cs. (1993). The Phenomenology of the Experiences and the Depth of Hypnosis: Comparison of Direct and Indirect Induction Techniques. International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis, 41, 225-233.
107. Tart, C. T. (1969) Psychedelic Experiences Associated With a Novel Hypnotic Procedure, Mutual Hypnosis. In C. T. Tart (ed.) Altered States of Consciousness (pp. 291-308). New York: Wiley.
108. Tart, C. T. (1972). Altered States of Consciousness. New York: Anchor Book Doubleday and Company Inc.
109. Tickle-Degnen, L., and Rosenthal, R. (1990) The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal Correlates. Psychological Inquiery, 1(4): 285-293 and 324-329.
110. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I. and Gosi-Greguss, A. C. (1991) Investigating the Phenomenological Level of Hypnosis Within the Social Psychobiological Model of Hypnotic Interaction. Abstract. In Abstracts of the Second European Congress of Psychology, Budapest, Hungary, July 8-12, 1991, Vol. II. 120.
111. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., and Gosi-Greguss, A. C. (1994) Parallel Application of the Experiential Analysis Technique with Subject and Hypnotist: A New Possibility for Measuring Interactional Synchrony. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42(1): 130-139.
112. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C. (1996) Harmony in Phenomenology: A New Way to Measure Interactional Synchrony. 7th European Congress of Hypnosis, Budapest, Hungary, August 17-23. Book of Abstracts, 147.
113. Varga, K. Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A.C. (1997) New Ways of Characterizing the Phenomenological Aspect of Rapport. 14th International Congress of Hypnosis, San Diego, California, United States of America, June, 21-27, Scientific Presentation Abstracts, 64-65.
114. Varga, K., Bányai É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A: C. (1999) Hypnotists' Phenomenology: Toward the Understanding of Hypnotic Interactions. Hypnos, 26(4): 181-193.
115. Varga K., Bányai É.I., Gosi-Greguss A. C. (2000) Transference and Countertransference in Experimental Hypnotic Settings. 15. International Congress of Hypnosis, München, 2-7. October 2000., Book of Abstracts, 128.
116. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., and Horváth, R. J. (1992) Interactional Application of Experiential Analysis Technique. Abstract. In Book of Abstracts of the 12th International Congress of Hypnosis. Jerusalem. Israel. July 25-31, 38.
117. Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A.C., and Tauszik, K. (n.d.): Phenomenological Aspects of Hypnotic Interactions: The Effect of Kinship. Paper to be submitted to International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.
118. Varga, K., Bányai, É.I., Józsa, E. and Gosi-Greguss, A.C. (2008): Interactional Phenomenology of Maternal and Paternal Hypnosis Styles. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(1), 14-28.
119. Varga K., Józsa E., Bányai I. É., Gosi-Greguss A. C. (2006) A New Way of Characterizing Hypnotic Interactions: Dyadic Interactional Harmony (DIH) Quastionnaire. Contemporary Hypnosis, 24 (4), 151-166.
120. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss A. C., and Kumar, V. K. (2001) Phenomenological Experiences Associated With Hypnotic Susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 49(1): 19-29.
121. Varga, K., Józsa, E., Bányai, É. I., Gosi-Greguss, A. C., Suhai-Hodász, G., (2004) Hypnosis Interaction from an Evolutionary Perspective: the Patterns of Harmony in Phenomenology. Paper presented at the 16th International Congress of Hypnosis Singapore, October 17-22, 2004. Book of Abstracts, 17.
122. Vas, J. (1993) The "Counter-Trance" Concept: Pulling Psychotic Patients Out Of the Well of Pathological Regression. Hypnos, 20(2):94-99.
123. Wachtel, P. L. (1973) Psychodinamics, Behavior Therapy, and the Implacable Experimenter: An Inquiry Into the Consistency of Personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 324-334.
124. Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1978). Hypnotism and Altered States of Consciousness. In A. Sugarman and R. E. Tarter (Eds.) Expanding Dimensions of Consciousness (pp. 183-225). New York: Springer.
125. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., and Hilgard, E. R. (1959) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
126. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., and Hilgard, E. R. (1962) Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms C. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
127. White, R. W. (1941) A Preface to the Theory of Hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 36, 477-505.
128. Woodside, L. N., Kumar, V. K., and Pekala, R. J. (1997). Monotonous Percussion Drumming and Trance Postures: A Controlled Evaluation of Phenomenological Effects. Anthropology of Consciousness, 8(2-3), 69-87.
129. Yapko, M. A. (1984) Implications of the Ericksonian and Neurolinguistic Programming Approaches for Responsibility of Therapeutic Outcomes. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27(2): 137-143.