The interactive nature of hypnosis: Research evidence for a social-psychobiological model

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 52-63

  Bányai, Éva I ^a  

^a EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Hypnotic style; Interaction; Maternal hypnosis; Paternal hypnosis; Social psychobiological model

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011922653     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.116     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Argyle M. The Social Psychology of Everyday Life. London: Routledge, 1992.
2. Baker EL. An hypnotherapeutic approach to enhance object relatedness in psychotic patients. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1981; 29: 136-147.
3. Bandura A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist 1978; 33: 344-358.
4. Bányai É.I. A social psychophysiological approach to the understanding of hypnosis: The interaction between hypnotist and subject. Hypnos. Swedish Journal of Hypnosis in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine 1985; 12: 186-210.
5. Bányai É.I. Toward a social-psychobiological model of hypnosis. In Lynn SJ, Rhue JW, eds. Theories of Hypnosis. Current Models and Perspectives. New York, London: The Guilford Press, 1991; 564-598.
6. Bányai É.I. On the adaptive value of hypnosis: A social psychobiological model. Invited address presented at the 12th International Congress of Hypnosis, Jerusalem, Israel, 25-31 July 1992.
7. Bányai ÉI, Mészáros I, Greguss AC. Alteration of activity level: The essence of hypnosis or a byproduct of the type of induction? In Ádám G, Mészáros I, Bányai ÉI, eds. Advances in Physiological Sciences. Vol. 17. Brain and Behaviour. Budapest: Pergamon Press/Akadémiai Kiadó, 1981; 457-465.
8. Bányai ÉI, Mészáros I, Csokay L. Interaction between hypnotist and subject: A psychophysiological approach. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1982; 30: 193.
9. Bányai ÉI, Mészáros I, Csokay L. Interaction between hypnotist and subject: A social psychophysiological approach. (Preliminary report). In Waxman D, Misra PC, Gibson M, Basker MA, eds. Modern Trends in Hypnosis. New York, London: Plenum Press, 1985; 97-108.
10. Bányai ÉI, Gösi-Greguss AC, Vágó P, Varga K, Horváth R. Interactional approach to the understanding of hypnosis: Theoretical background and main findings. In Van Dyck R, Spinhoven Ph, Van der Does AJW, Van Rood YR, De Moor W, eds. Hypnosis: Current Theory, Research and Practice. Amsterdam: Free University Press, 1990; 53-69.
11. Basker MA, eds. Modern Trends in Hypnosis. New York and London: Plenum Press, 1985; 97-108.
12. Barber J. Hypnosis and the unhypnotizable. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1980; 23: 4-9.
13. Brazelton TB, Koslowski B, Main M. The origins of reciprocity: The early mother-infant interaction. In Lewis M, Rosenblum L, eds. The Effect of the Infant on its Caregiver. New York: Wiley, 1974.
14. Buss DM. Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1989; 12: 39-46.
15. Cacioppo JT. Social neuroscience: Autonomic, neuroendocrine, and immune responses to stress. Psychophysiology 1994; 31: 113-128.
16. Chertok L. The unconscious and hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1982; 30: 96-107.
17. Condon WS, Ogston WD. A segmentation of behavior. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1967; 5: 221-235.
18. Diamond MJ. It takes two to tango: Some thoughts on the neglected importance of the hypnotist in an interactive hypnotherapeutic relationship. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1984; 27: 3-13.
19. Diamond MJ. The interactional basis of hypnotic experience: On the relational dimensions of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1987; 35: 95-115.
20. Erickson MH, Rossi EL, Rossi SI. Hypnotic Realities: The Induction of Clinical Hypnosis and Forms of Indirect Suggestion. New York: Irvington, 1976.
21. Ferenczi S. Introjektion und Uebertragung. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse 1909; 1: 422-457. Citation from Ferenczi, S. Comments on Hypnosis. (Translated by Jones, E.) In Shor RE, Orne MT, eds. The Nature of Hypnosis. Selected Basic Readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965; 177-178.
22. Ferenczi S. Introjektion und Uebertragung. Jahrbuch der Psychoanalyse 1909; 1: 422-457. Citation from Ferenczi, S. Comments on Hypnosis. (Translated by Jones, E.) In Shor RE, Orne MT, eds. The Nature of Hypnosis. Selected Basic Readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965; 177-178.
23. Field T. Attachment as psychobiological attunement: Being on the same wavelength. In M. Reite, and T. Field (Eds.) The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. (Behavioral Biology.) Orlando: Academic Press, 1985; 415-454.
24. Fourie DP. Width of the hypnotic relationship: An interactional view of hypnotic susceptibility and hypnotic depth. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1983; 11: 1-14.
25. Freud S. Massenpsychologie und Ich-analyse. Leipzig, Vienna und Zurich: Internalionaler Psychoanalystisher Verlag, 1921.
26. Gösi-Greguss AC, Bányai ÉI, Varga K. Hypnotist styles as reflected in standardized hypnosis experiments. Paper presented at the 6th European Congress of Hypnosis, Vienna, Austria, 14-20 August 1993.
27. Haley J. An interactional explanation of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1958; 1: 41-57.
28. Haley J. How hypnotist and subject maneuver each other. In Haley J, ed. Strategies of Psychotherapy. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1963.
29. Hilgard ER. Divided Consciousness: Multiple Controls in Human Thought and Action. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
30. Horváth RJ, Bányai ÉI, Varga K, Gösi-Greguss AC, Vágó P. Interactional approach lo the understanding of hypnosis: Relational dimensions. Paper presented at the 11th International Congress of Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine, Leiden, The Netherlands, August 1988.
31. House JS, Landis KR, Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science 1988; 241: 540-545
32. Kubie LS, Margolin S. The process of hypnotism and the nature of the hypnotic state. American Journal of Psychiatry 1944; 100: 611-622.
33. Levitt EE, Baker EI. The hypnotic relationship - another look at coercion, compliance and resistance: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1983; 31: 125-131.
34. Lynn SJ, Nash MR, Rhue JW, Frauman DC, Sweeney C. Nonvolition, expectancies, and hypnotic rapport. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1984; 93: 295-303.
35. Mészáros I, Bányai ÉI, Greguss AC. Evoked potential, reflecting hypnotically altered state of consciousness. In Ádám G, Mészáros I, Bányai ÉI, eds. Advances in Physiological Sciences. Vol. 17. Brain and Behaviour. Budapest: Pergamon Press/Akadémiai Kiadó, 1981; 467-475.
36. Montgomery BM, Duck S, eds. Studying Interpersonal Interaction. New York, London: Guilford Press, 1991.
37. Nash MR, Spinier D. Hypnosis and transference: A measure of archaic involvement. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1989; 37: 129-143.
38. Reite M, Field T, eds. The Psychobiology of Attachment and Separation. (Behavioral Biology.) Orlando: Academic Press, 1985.
39. Sheehan PW, McConkey KM. Hypnosis and Experience: The Exploration of Phenomena and Process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1982.
40. Shor RE. A phenomenological method for the measurement of variables important to an understanding of the nature of hypnosis. In Fromm E, Shor RE, eds. Hypnosis: Developments in Research and New Perspectives. New York: Aldine, 1979.
41. Stern D. Some interactive functions of rhythm changes between mother and infant. In Davis M, ed. Interaction Rhythms. Periodicity in Communicative Behavior. New York: Human Sciences Press, 1982; 101-117.
42. Van Dyck R. How to use Ericksonian approaches when you are not Milton H. Erickson. In Zeig JK, ed. Ericksonian approaches to hypnosis and psychotherapy. New York: Brunner-Mazel, 1982; 37-47.
43. Varga K, Bányai ÉI, Gösi-Greguss AC. Parallel application of the Experiential Analysis Technique with subject and hypnotist: A new possibility for measuring interactional synchrony. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1994; 42: 130-139.
44. Von Bertalanffy. General system theory and psychiatry. In Caplan G, ed. American Handbook of Psychiatry. Vol. II. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
45. Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER. Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1959.