Message in a bottle: claims disputes and the reconciliation of precaution and weight-of-evidence in the regulation of risks from Bisphenol A in Canada

Health, Risk and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 432-448

  Edge, Sara ^a   Eyles, John ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canada; chemical management; health risks; precaution; risk; risk assessment; weight of evidence

Indexed keywords

4, 4' ISOPROPYLIDENEDIPHENOL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CANADA; DECISION MAKING; DOSE RESPONSE; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LEGAL EVIDENCE; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84883487193     PISSN: 13698575     EISSN: 14698331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13698575.2013.802293     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Adams, M.D. 2002. The precautionary principle and the rhetoric behind it. Journal of risk research, 5 (4): 301 - 316.
2. Alaszewski, A. and Burgess, A. 2007. Risk, time and reason. Health, risk & society, 9 (4): 349 - 358.
3. BPA Global Group, 2009a. Bisphenol A. http://www.bisphenol-a.org/ (http://www.bisphenol-a.org/) (Accessed: 4 April 2009).
4. BPA Global Group, 2009b. Notice of objection and request for board of review in relation to the proposed order to add phenol, 4,4' -(1-methylethylidene) bis- (bisphenol A), CAS No. 80-05-7 to Schedule 1 to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Canada Gazette, Vol. 143, No. 20, May 16, 2009. http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=en&n=9FD28889-1 (http://www.ec.gc.ca/lcpe-cepa/default.asp?lang=en&n=9FD28889-1) (Accessed: 1 January 2012).
5. Brown, P. 2006. Risk versus need in revising the 1983 Mental Health Act: conflicting claims, muddled policy. Health, risk & society, 8 (4): 343 - 358.
6. Brown, N. and Beynon-Jones, S.M. 2012. 'Reflex regulation': an anatomy of promissory science governance. Health, risk & society, 14 (3): 223 - 240.
7. Burger, J. 2003. Differing perspectives on the use of scientific evidence and the precautionary principle. Pure & applied chemistry, 72 (11 - 12): 2543 - 2545.
8. Bushnik, T. 2010. Lead and bisphenol A concentrations in the Canadian population. Statistics Canada health reports, 21 (3): 2 - 12. Catalogue No. 82-003-XPE.
9. Canada Gazette, 2010, June, 27. Order amending schedule I to the Hazardous Products Act. Government of Canada, 143 (26). http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2009/2009-06-27/html/reg5-eng.html (http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2009/2009-06-27/html/reg5-eng.html) (Accessed: 23 May 2013).
10. Canadian Environmental Protection Act. 1999. S.C., 1999: c.33
11. Canadian Plastics Industry Association, 2009. Safety of bisphenol A. http://www.cpia.ca/newsroom/details.php?ID=58 (http://www.cpia.ca/newsroom/details.php?ID=58) (Accessed: 12 April 2009).
12. Carvalho, A. 2007. Ideological cultures, media discourses and scientific knowledge. Public understand of science, 16: 223 - 243.
13. CELA (Canadian Environmental Law Association), 2002. Implementing precaution: NGO response to the Government of Canada's discussion document 'A Canadian perspective on the precautionary approach/principle'. Toronto, ON: CELA. http://www.cela.ca/article/precautionary-principle/implementing-precaution-ngo-response-government-canadas-discussion-d (http://www.cela.ca/article/precautionary-principle/implementing-precaution-ngo-response-government-canadas-discussion-d) (Accessed: 21 May 2013).
14. CEN (Canadian Environmental Network), 2010. Consolidated civil society perspectives on the Chemicals Management Plan (CMP). http://www.cen-rce.org/CMP/pdf/report_civilsociety_CMP-CBP.pdf (http://www.cen-rce.org/CMP/pdf/report_civilsociety_CMP-CBP.pdf) (Accessed: 1 June 2011).
15. Chinese TV News. 2011 China to ban BPA in baby bottles. http://english.cntv.cn/program/china24/20110601/111640.shtml (http://english.cntv.cn/program/china24/20110601/111640.shtml) (Accessed: 1 June 2011).
16. CTV News, 2007. Environment tops public agenda, poll finds. http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070125/environment_poll_07025/20070125?hub=TopStories (http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20070125/environment_poll_07025/20070125?hub=TopStories) (Accessed: 23 May 2013).
17. Davis, D. 2007. The secret history of the war on cancer, New York: Basic Books.
18. Driedger, S.M. and Eyles, J. 2003. Different frames, different fears: communicating about chlorinated drinking water and cancer in the Canadian media. Social science & medicine, 56: 1270 - 1293.
19. Edge, S. and Eyles, J. (in press). The socio-spatial (re)configuration of legitimacy, knowledge & practice in chemical risk governance: an exploratory integration of boundary-work & scale-frame analytics. Environmental Politics.
20. Entine, J. 2010. The troubling case of bisphenol A: at what point should science prevail?. American Enterprise Institute of Public Policy Research,: 2 Outlook No
21. Environment Canada & Health Canada, 2008. Proposed risk management approach for bisphenol A. http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/challenge/batch2/batch2_80-05-7_rm_en.pdf (http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/challenge/batch2/batch2_80-05-7_rm_en.pdf) (Accessed: 1 December 2009).
22. Environmental Defence, 2009. Ban toxics, baby! Rally proves successful. http://www.toxicnation.ca/node/141 (http://www.toxicnation.ca/node/141) (Accessed: 1 April 2009).
23. Environmental Defence, 2010. Banning bisphenol A. http://environmentaldefence.ca/campaigns/banning-bisphenol-bpa (http://environmentaldefence.ca/campaigns/banning-bisphenol-bpa) (Accessed: 23 May 2013).
24. Environmental Defence, 2011. Canada's chemicals management plan progress analysis: 2006-2011. Toronto, ON: Environmental Defence.
25. Ericson B.E., 2008. Bisphenol A under scrutiny: congress, media call into question safety of widely used plastics chemical. Chemical & engineering news, 86 (22), 36-39. http://pubs.acs.org/cen/government/86/8622gov1.html (http://pubs.acs.org/cen/government/86/8622gov1.html) (Accessed: 1 April 2009).
26. European Commission, 2000. Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle, COM(2000)1, Brussels, 2 February 2000. http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf) (Accessed: 23 May 2013).
27. FDA (Food and Drug Administration), 2010. Update on bisphenol A for use in food contact applications. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/UCM197778.pdf (http://www.fda.gov/downloads/NewsEvents/PublicHealthFocus/UCM197778.pdf) (Accessed: 23 May 2013).
28. Foster, K.R., Vecchia, P. and Rapacholi, M.H. 2000. Science and the precautionary principle. Science, 288: 979 - 981.
29. Gee, J.P. 2005. An introduction to discourse analysis theory and method, 2nd ed, New York: Routledge.
30. Goodman, J.E. 2006. An updated weight of the evidence evaluation of reproductive and developmental effects of low doses of bisphenol A. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36: 387 - 457.
31. Government of Canada, 2001. A Canadian perspective on the precautionary approach/principle proposed guiding principles. http://www.ercb.ca/docs/applications/submissions/1458443/Ex%20002-96-02.pdf (http://www.ercb.ca/docs/applications/submissions/1458443/Ex%20002-96-02.pdf) (Accessed: 1 April 2012).
32. Government of Canada, 2003. A framework for the application of precaution in science-based decision making about risk. http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/docs/information/publications/precaution/Precaution-eng.pdf (http://www.pco-bcp.gc.ca/docs/information/publications/precaution/Precaution-eng.pdf) (Accessed: 1 June 2011).
33. Government of Canada. 2008. Proposed risk management approach for bisphenol A,: 80 - 05-7. Chemical Abstract Service Registry Number (CAS RN)
34. Gray, G.M. 2004. Weight of the evidence evaluation of low-dose reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A. Human and ecological risk assessment: an international journal, 10 (5): 875 - 921. et al
35. Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W. 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy and planning, 7 (3): 175 - 184.
36. Hannigan, J. 1995. Environmental sociology, London: Routledge.
37. Hansen, S. 2007. Chemicals regulation and precaution: does REACH really incorporate the precautionary principle. Environmental science & policy, 10: 395 - 404. et al
38. Health Canada, 2008. Chemicals management plan - challenge advisory panel summary report. http://www.chemicalsubstanceschimiques.gc.ca/challenge-defi/summary-03-08-sommaire_e.html (http://www.chemicalsubstanceschimiques.gc.ca/challenge-defi/summary-03-08-sommaire_e.html) (Accessed: 1 April 2009).
39. Hulme, M. 2008. The conquering of climate: discourses of fear and their dissolution. Geographic Journal, 174: 5 - 16.
40. ICIS Chemical Business, 2009. Bisphenol A (BPA) CAS No: 80-05-7. http://www.icis.com/V2/chemicals/9075162/bisphenol-a.html (http://www.icis.com/V2/chemicals/9075162/bisphenol-a.html) (Accessed: 1 December 2009).
41. Iles, A. 2007. Identifying health risks in consumer products: non-governmental organizations and civic epistemologies. Public understanding of science, 16: 371 - 391.
42. Jasanoff, S. 2005. Design on nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43. Kalogeras, N., Pennings, J.M.E., and Van Ittersum, K., 2008. Consumer food safety risk attitudes and perceptions over time: the case of BSE crisis. Paper presented at the 2008 International Congress, 26-29 August 2008, Ghent, Belgium, European Association of Agricultural Economists. http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/44156.html (http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/44156.html)
44. Kriebel, D. 2001. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environmental health perspectives, 109 (9): 871 - 876. et al
45. Lang, I.A. 2008. Association of urinary bisphenol A concentration with medical disorders and laboratory abnormalities in adults. Journal of American medical association, 300 (11): 1303 - 1310.
46. Layton, L. 2008. Washington Post. A-SECTION,: A - 01. Studies on chemical in plastics questioned: congress examines role of industry in regulation 27, 2008, 27 April
47. Lenihan, D.G. and Alcock, R. 2000. " Collaborative government in the post-industrial age: five discussion pieces ". In Changing Government Volume I, Ottawa, ON: Centre for Collaborative Government.
48. Maffini, M.V. 2006. Endocrine disruptors and reproductive health: the case of bisphenol-A. Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 25: 179 - 186. et al
49. McMullan, C. and Eyles, J. 1999. Risky business: an analysis of claims making in the development of an Ontario drinking water objective for tritium. Social Problems, 46 (2): 294 - 311.
50. Miller, C.A. 2004. " Climate science and the making of a global political order ". In In: S Jasanoff, ed, 46 - 66. New York: Routledge States of knowledge.
51. Morone, M. and Lohrer, T. 2002. Sound science, junk policy: environmental health science in the decision-making process, Westport, CT: Greenwood.
52. NTP (National Toxicology Program). 2001. National toxicology program's report of the endocrine disruptors low dose peer review, Sponsored by: US Environmental Protection Agency and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences National Toxicology Program.
53. NTP (National Toxicology Program - Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction). 2008. NTP-CERHR monograph on the potential human reproductive and developmental effects of bisphenol A,: 08 - 599. Durham, NC: Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction, NIH Publication No-4.
54. O'Riordan, T. 2004. Environmental science, sustainability and politics. Transactions of the institute for British geographers, 29 (2): 237 - 247.
55. Osimani, B. 2013. The precautionary principle in the pharmaceutical domain: a philosophical enquiry into probabilistic reasoning and risk aversion. Health, risk & society,: 15 (2), 123 - 143.
56. Pedynowski, D. 2003. Science(s) which, when and whose? Probing the meta-narrative of scientific knowledge in the social construction off nature. Progress in human geography, 27 (6): 735 - 752.
57. Raffensperger, C. and Tickner, J., eds. 1999. Protecting public health and the environment: implementing the precautionary principle, Washington, DC: Island Press.
58. Sabatier, P.A. 1987. Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change: an advocacy coalition framework. Science communication, 8: 649 - 692.
59. Santillo, D. 1998. The precautionary principle: protecting against failures of scientific method and risk assessment. Marine pollution bulletin, 36 (12): 939 - 960. et al
60. Scott, D.N. 2009. Testing toxicity: proof and precaution in Canada's chemicals management plan. Review of European Community and international environmental law (Reciel, 18 (1): 59 - 77.
61. Shostak, S. 2004. Environmental justice and genomics: acting on the futures of environmental health. Science as culture, 13 (4): 539 - 562.
62. Timotijevic, L. and Barnett, J. 2006. Managing the possible health risks of mobile telecommunications: public understandings of precautionary action and advice. Health, risk & society, 8 (2): 143 - 164.
63. United Nations Environment Programme, 1992. Rio declaration on environment and development. http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163 (http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163) (Accessed: 1 March 2012).
64. Vogel, S.A. 2009. The politics of plastics: the making and un-making of bisphenol A 'safety. American journal of public health, 99 (s3): s559 - s566.
65. Vom Saal, F.S. and Hughes, C. 2005. An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environmental health perspectives, 113 (8): 926 - 933.
66. Vom Saal, F.S. 2007. Chapel Hill bisphenol A expert panel consensus statement: integration of mechanisms, effects in animals and potential to impact human health at current levels of exposure. Reproductive toxicology, 24 (2): 131 - 138. et al
67. Welshons, W.V. 2003. Large effects from small exposures: mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environmental health perspectives, 111 (8): 994 - 1006. et al
68. Wiener, J.B. and Rogers, M.D. 2002. Comparing precaution in the United States and Europe. Journal of risk research, 5 (4): 317 - 349.
69. Wildavsky, A. and Dake, K. 1990. Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?. Daedalus,: 19 (4), 41 - 60.