Digital physical activity data collection and use by endurance runners and distance cyclists

Technology, Knowledge and Learning

Volumn 18, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 39-63

  Lee, Victor R ^a   Drake, Joel ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Affinity spaces; Bicycling; Bike computers; Fitness tracking; Identity; Physical activity data; Quantified self; Running; Sensors

Indexed keywords

SENSORS; USER EXPERIENCE;

AFFINITY SPACES; BICYCLING; IDENTITY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUANTIFIED SELF; RUNNING;

SPORTS;

EID: 84883448480     PISSN: 22111662     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-013-9203-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Azevedo, F. (2011). Lines of practice: A practice-centered theory of interest relationships. Cognition and Instruction, 29(2), 147-184.
2. Berland, L. K., & Lee, V. R. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011. 645086.
3. Borg, G. (1998). Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
4. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
5. Ching, C. C., & Foley, B. J. (Eds.). (2012). Constructing the self in a digital world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3/4), 391-450.
7. Edelson, D. C., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335-354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fields, D. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2012). Navigating life as an avatar: The shifting identities-in-practice of a girl player in a tween virtual world. In C. C. Ching & B. J. Foley (Eds.), Constructing the self in a digital world (pp. 222-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3-36.
10. Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From The Age of Mythology to today's schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214-232). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. New York: Taylor & Francis.
12. Hall, R., Stevens, R., & Torralba, T. (2002). Disrupting representational infrastructure in conversations across disciplines. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(3), 179-210.
13. Halverson, E. R., & Halverson, R. (2008). Fantasy baseball: The case for competitive fandom. Games and Culture, 3(3-4), 286-308.
14. Kafai, Y. B., Fields, D. A., & Cook, M. S. (2010). Your second selves: Avatar designs and identity play. Games and Culture, 5(1), 23-42.
15. Kanter, D., Sherin, B., & Lee, V. (2006). Changing conceptual ecologies in task-structured science curricula. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference of the learning sciences (Vol. 1, pp. 293-299). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-483.
17. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lee, V. R. (2013). Knowing and learning with technology (and on wheels!): An introduction to the special issue. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. doi: 10.1007/s10758-013-9204-2.
19. Lee, V. R., & Drake, J. (2012). Physical activity data use by technoathletes: Examples of collection, inscription, and identification. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012) (Vol. 2, pp. 321-325). Sydney, NSW: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
20. Lee, V. R., & DuMont, M. (2010). An exploration into how physical activity data-recording devices could be used in computer-supported data investigations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15(3), 167-189. doi: 10.1007/s10758-010-9172-8.
21. Lee, V. R., & Thomas, J. M. (2011). Integrating physical activity data technologies into elementary school classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(6), 865-884. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9210-9.
22. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. McDougall, C. (2009). Born to run: A hidden tribe, superathletes, and the greatest race the world has never seen. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
24. Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143-179. doi: 10.1080/10508400801986108.
25. Noss, R., Pozzi, S., & Hoyles, C. (1999). Touching epistemologies: Meanings of average and variation in nursing practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 40(1), 25-51.
26. Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95-123.
27. Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2007). From SuperGoo to scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(2), 149-166. doi: 10.1080/17439880701343337.
28. Reeve, S., & Bell, P. (2009). Children's self documentation and understanding of the concepts 'healthy' and 'unhealthy'. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1953-1974.
29. Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., et al. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67. doi: 10.1145/1592761.1592779.
30. Rivera-Pelayo, V., Zacharias, V., Müller, L., & Braun, S. (2012). Applying quantified self approaches to support reflective learning. In S. Dawson & C. Hathornwaite (Eds.), LAK '12 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 111-114). New York, NY: ACM.
31. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Roth, W. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1998). Inscriptions: Toward a theory of representing as social practice. Review of Educational Research, 68(1), 35-59.
33. Sherin, B. (2001). A comparison of programming and algebraic notation as expressive languages for physics. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 1-61.
34. Smith, B. K., Frost, J., Albayrak, M., & Sudhakar, R. (2006). Facilitating narrative medical discussions of type 1 diabetes with computer visualizations and photography. Patient Education and Counseling, 64, 313-321.
35. Stefani, R. (2012). Olympic swimming gold: The suit or the swimmer in the suit? Significance, 9(2), 13-17.
36. Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
37. Turkle, S. (1997). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
38. Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Wilensky, U., & Resnick, M. (1999). Thinking in levels: A dynamic systems approach to making sense of the world. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 3-19.
42. Wilson, D. G. (2004). Bicycling science (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Wu, H., & Kracjik, J. S. (2006). Inscription practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders' use of data tables and graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 63-95.