Classifying dialogue acts in multi-party live chats

Proceedings of the 26th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, PACLIC 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 463-472

  Kim, Su Nam ^a   Cavedon, Lawrence ^b   Baldwin, Timothy ^c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE ACTS; INTERACTION INFORMATION; LIBRARY OF CONGRESS; MACHINE LEARNING APPROACHES; MULTI-PARTY DIALOGUES; ONLINE FORUMS;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 84883444139     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. James Allen and Mark Core. 1997. Draft of damsl: Dialog act markup in several layers. Technical report, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA. The Multiparty Discourse Group.
2. Srinivas Bangalore, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio, and Amanda Stent. 2006. Learning the structure of task-driven human-human dialogs. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 201-208, Sydney, Australia.
3. William W. Cohen, Vitor R. Carvalho, and Tom M. Mitchell. 2004. Learning to classify email into speech acts. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004), pages 309-316, Barcelona, Spain.
4. Gao Cong, Long Wang, Chin-Yew Lin, Young-In Song, and Yueheng Sun. 2008. Finding question-answer pairs from online forums. In Proceedings of 31st International ACM-SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR08), pages 467-474, Singapore.
5. Micha Elsner and Eugene Charniak. 2008. You talking to me? a corpus and algorithm for conversation disentanglement. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the ACL: HLT (ACL 2008), pages 834-842, Columbus, USA.
6. Eric N. Forsyth. 2007. Improving automated lexical and discourse analysis of online chat dialog. Master's thesis, Naval Postgraduate School.
7. Edward Ivanovic. 2008. Automatic instant messaging dialogue using statistical models and dialogue acts. Master's thesis, The University of Melbourne.
8. Daniel Jurafsky, Elizabeth Shriberg, Barbara Fox, and Traci Curl. 1998. Lexical, prosodic, and syntactic cues for dialog acts. In Proceedings of ACL/COLING- 98 Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, pages 114-120, Montreal, Canada.
9. Dan Jurafsky, Rajesh Ranganath, and Dan McFarland. 2009. Extracting social meaning: identifying interactional style in spoken conversation. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL HLT 2009), pages 638-646, Boulder, USA.
10. Su Nam Kim, Lawrence Cavedon, and Timothy Baldwin. 2010a. Classifying dialogue acts in 1-to-1 live chats. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2010), pages 862-871, Boston, USA.
11. Su Nam Kim, Li Wang, and Timothy Baldwin. 2010b. Tagging and linking web forum posts. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 192-202, Uppsala, Sweden.
12. Andrew Lampert, Robert Dale, and Cecile Paris. 2008. The nature of requests and ecommitments in email messages. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2008 Workshop on Enhanced Messaging, pages 42-47, Chicago, USA.
13. Andrew Kachites McCallum. 2002. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. http://mallet.cs.umass.edu.
14. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207-223.
15. Gabriel Murray, Steve Renals, Jean Carletta, and Johanna Moore. 2006. Incorporating speaker and discourse features into speech summarization. In Proceedings of the Main Conference on Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 367- 374, New York, USA.
16. Ken Samuel, Sandra Carberry, and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1998. Dialogue act tagging with transformation-based learning. In Proceedings of COLING/ACL 1998, pages 1150-1156, Montreal, Canada.
17. Andreas Stolcke, Klaus Ries, Noah Coccaro, Elizabeth Shriberg, Rebecca Bates, Daniel Jurafsky, Paul Taylor, Rachel Martin, Carol Van Ess-Dykema, and Marie Meteer. 2000. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339-373.
18. Li Wang, Marco Lui, Su Nam Kim, Joakim Nivre, and Timothy Baldwin. 2011. Predicting thread discourse structure over technical web forums. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2011), pages 13- 25, Edinburgh, UK.
19. Christopher C. Werry. 1996. Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In Susan C. Herring, editor, Computer-Mediated Communication. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
20. Ian Witten and Eibe Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, USA.
21. Tianhao Wu, Faisal M. Khan, Todd A. Fisher, Lori A. Shuler, and William M. Pottenger. 2002. Posting act tagging using transformation-based learning. In Proceedings of theWorkshop on Foundations of Data Mining and Discovery, IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Maebashi City, Japan.
22. Alexander Yeh. 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), pages 947-953, Saarbr̈ucken, Germany.