Extracting social meaning: Identifying interactional style in spoken conversation

NAACL HLT 2009 - Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 638-646

  Jurafsky, Dan ^a   Ranganath, Rajesh ^b   McFarland, Dan ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; PROSODIC FEATURES; SOCIAL COMPUTING; SPOKEN CONVERSATION; SPOKEN DIALOGUE;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 78651456395     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. J. Ang, R. Dhillon, A. Krupski, E. Shriberg, and A. Stolcke. 2002. Prosody-Based Automatic Detection of Annoyance and Frustration in Human-Computer Dialog. In INTERSPEECH-02.
2. P. Boersma and D. Weenink. 2005. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version 4.3.14). [Computer program]. Retrieved May 26, 2005, from http://www.praat.org/.
3. S. Brave, C. Nass, and K. Hutchinson. 2005. Computers that care: Investigating the effects of orientation of emotion exhibited by an embodied conversational agent. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62(2):161-178. (Pubitemid 40206241)
4. S. E. Brennan and M. F. Schober. 2001. How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44:274-296. (Pubitemid 33379932)
5. S. E. Brennan and M. Williams. 1995. The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 34:383-398.
6. J. Coates. 1996. Women Talk. Blackwell.
7. M. A. Cohn, M. R. Mehl, and J. W. Pennebaker. 2004. Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15:687-693. (Pubitemid 39443237)
8. C. Edelsky. 1981. Who's got the floor? Language in Society, 10:383-421.
9. F. Enos, E. Shriberg, M. Graciarena, J. Hirschberg, and A. Stolcke. 2007. Detecting Deception Using Critical Segments. In INTERSPEECH-07.
10. D. Jurafsky, E. Shriberg, and D. Biasca. 1997. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Labeling Project Coder's Manual, Draft 13. Technical Report 97-02, University of Colorado Institute of Cognitive Science.
11. D. Jurafsky, E. Shriberg, B. Fox, and T. Curl. 1998. Lexical, prosodic, and syntactic cues for dialog acts. In Proceedings, COLING-ACL Workshop on Discourse Relations and Discourse Markers, pages 114-120.
12. D. Jurafsky. 2001. Pragmatics and computational linguistics. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward, editors, Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell.
13. C. M. Lee and S. S. Narayanan. 2002. Combining acoustic and language information for emotion recognition. In ICSLP-02, pages 873-876, Denver, CO.
14. G. H. Lerner. 1991. On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Language in Society, 20(3):441-458.
15. G. H. Lerner. 1996. On the "semi-permeable" character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, and S. A. Thompson, editors, Interaction and Grammar, pages 238-276. Cambridge University Press.
16. J. Liscombe, J. Venditti, and J. Hirschberg. 2003. Classifying Subject Ratings of Emotional Speech Using Acoustic Features. In INTERSPEECH-03.
17. A. Madan and A. Pentland. 2006. Vibefones: Socially aware mobile phones. In Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers.
18. A. Madan, R. Caneel, and A. Pentland. 2005. Voices of attraction. Presented at Augmented Cognition, HCI 2005, Las Vegas.
19. F. Mairesse and M. Walker. 2008. Trainable generation of big-five personality styles through data-driven parameter estimation. In ACL-08, Columbus.
20. F. Mairesse, M. Walker, M. Mehl, and R. Moore. 2007. Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR), 30:457-500.
21. C. Nass and S. Brave. 2005. Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the human-computer relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. M. L. Newman, J. W. Pennebaker, D. S. Berry, and J. M. Richards. 2003. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic style. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29:665-675.
23. A. Y. Ng. 2004. Feature selection, L1 vs. L2 regularization, and rotational invariance. In ICML 2004.
24. J. W. Pennebaker and T. C. Lay. 2002. Language use and personality during crises: Analyses of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's press conferences. Journal of Research in Personality, 36:271-282.
25. J. W. Pennebaker, R. Booth, and M. Francis. 2007. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2007 operator's manual. Technical report, University of Texas.
26. A. Pentland. 2005. Socially aware computation and communication. Computer, pages 63-70.
27. A. M. Pomerantz. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessment: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, editors, Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
28. A. Rosenberg and J. Hirschberg. 2005. Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. In EUROSPEECH-05, pages 513-516, Lisbon, Portugal. (Pubitemid 43908112)
29. S. S. Rude, E. M. Gortner, and J. W. Pennebaker. 2004. Language use of depressed and depression-vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18:1121-1133. (Pubitemid 40017206)
30. H. Sacks, E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4):696-735.
31. E. A. Schegloff, G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53:361-382.