The effect of information analysis automation display content on human judgment performance in noisy environments

Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-65

  Bass, Ellen J ^a   Baumgart, Leigh A ^a   Shepley, Kathryn Klein ^a  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Automation display content; Human automated judge learning; Human automation interaction; Judgment analysis

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

AIR-TRAFFIC CONFLICTS; ENVIRONMENTAL DATA; HUMAN-AUTOMATED JUDGE LEARNING; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS AUTOMATION; JUDGMENT ANALYSIS; NOISY ENVIRONMENT; PROBABILITY OF CONFLICTS;

AUTOMATION;

EID: 84883371288     PISSN: 15553434     EISSN: 21695032     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1555343412453461     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Balzer, W. K., Doherty, M. E. & O'Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410-433.
2. Bass, E. J., & Pritchett, A. R. (2008). Human-Automated Judge Learning: A methodology for examining human interaction with information analysis automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 38(4), 759-776.
3. Box, G., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters: An introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York: Wiley.
4. Brunswik, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. In O. Neurath, R. Carnap, & C. Morris (Eds.), International encyclopedia of unified science (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkley: University of California Press.
6. Burns, C. M., & Hajdukiewicz, J. R. (2004). Ecological interface design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
7. Cooksey, R. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods, and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Crocoll, W. M., & Coury, B. G. (1990). Status or recommendation: Selecting the type of information for decision aiding. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (pp. 1524-1528). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
9. de Vries, P., Midden, C., & Bouwhuis, D. (2003). The effects of errors on system trust, self-confidence, and the allocation of control in route planning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 719-735.
10. Drews, F. A., & Westenskow, D. R. (2006). The right picture is worth a thousand numbers: Data displays in anesthesia. Human Factors, 48(1), 59-71.
11. Dzindolet, M. T., Peterson, S. A., Pomranky, R. A., Pierce, L. G., & Beck, H. P. (2003). The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6), 697-718.
12. Endsley, M. R., & Kiris, E. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381-394.
13. Endsley, M. R., & Kaber, D. B. (1999). Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Ergonomics, 42(3), 462-492.
14. Gattie, G., & Bisantz, A. (2006). The effects of integrated cognitive feedback components and task conditions on training in a dental diagnosis task. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(5), 485-497.
15. Hursch, C. J., Hammond, K. R., & Hursch, J. L. (1964). Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability, Psychological Review, 71, 42-60.
16. Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (1997). Out-of-the-loop performance problems and the use of intermediate levels of automation for improved control system functioning and safety. Process Safety Progress, 16(3), 126-131.
17. Kaber, D. B., & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5(2), 113-153.
18. Kirlik, A. (1995). Requirements for psychological models to support design: Towards ecological task analysis. In J. M. Flach, P. A. Hancock, J. K. Caird, & K. J. Vicente (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (Vol. 1, pp. 68-120). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 40(1), 153-184.
20. Lorenz, B., Di Nocera, F., Röttger, S., & Parasuraman, R. (2002). Automated fault-management in a simulated spaceflight micro-world. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 73(9), 886-897.
21. Masalonis, A. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2003). Effects of situation-specific reliability on trust and usage of automated air traffic control decision aids. In Proceedings of the 47th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (pp. 533-537). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
22. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000). A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 30(3), 286-297.
23. Pritchett, A. R., & Vandor, B. (2001). Designing situation displays to promote conformance to automatic alerts. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (pp. 311-315). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
24. Rovira, E., McGarry, K., & Parasuraman, R. (2007). Effects of imperfect automation on decision making in a simulated command and control task. Human Factors, 49(1), 76.
25. Sarter, N. B., & Schroeder, B. (2001). Supporting decision making and action selection under time pressure and uncertainty: The case of in-flight icing. Human Factors, 43(4), 573-583.
26. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1992). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation: Operational experiences with the flight management system. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 2(4), 303-321.
27. Sarter, N. B., & Woods, D. D. (1994). Pilot interaction with cockpit automation II: An experimental study of pilots' model and awareness of the flight management system. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 4(1), 1-28.
28. Seong, Y., & Bisantz, A. M. (2002). Judgment and trust in conjunction with automated decision aids: A theoretical model and empirical investigation. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society (pp. 423-427). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
29. Seong, Y., & Bisantz, A. (2008). The impact of cognitive feedback on judgment performance and trust with decision aids. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(7-8), 608-625.
30. Skjerve, A., & Skraaning, G. (2004). The quality of human-automation cooperation in human-system interface for nuclear power plants. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5), 649-677.
31. Tucker, L. R. (1964). A suggested alternative formulation in the developments of Hursch, Hammond & Hursch and by Hammond, Hursch & Todd. Psychological Review, 71, 528-530.
32. Vicente, K. J. (2002). Ecological Interface Design: Progress and challenges. Human Factors, 44(1), 62-78.
33. Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems II: Mediating "direct perception" in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2(3), 207-249.
34. Wickens, C. D., Li, H., Santamaria, A., Sebok, A., & Sarter, N. B. (2010). Stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings (pp. 389-393). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomic Society.
35. Wickens, C. D., & Xu, X. (2002). Automation trust, reliability and attention, HMI 02 03 (AHDF Technical Report No. AHFD-02-14/MAAD-02-2). Savoy: University of Illinois, Aviation Human Factors Division.
36. Woods, D. D. (1991). The cognitive engineering of problem representation. In G. R. S. Weir & J. L. Alty (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in complex systems (pp. 169-188). New York: Academic Press.