Sight over sound in the judgment of music performance

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 36, 2013, Pages 14580-14585

  Tsay, Chia Jung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognition; Communication; Decision making; Evaluation; Social perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPETITION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; SOUND; VIDEORECORDING; VISION; VISUAL INFORMATION; ADOLESCENT; ASSOCIATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MUSIC; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; SOUND; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883326207     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1221454110     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Howard DJ (1992) Gift-wrapping effects on product attitudes: A mood-biasing explanation. J Consum Psychol 1(3):197-223.
2. Back MD, Schmukle SC, Egloff B (2010) Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. J Pers Soc Psychol 98(1):132-145.
3. Todorov A, Mandisodza AN, Goren A, Hall CC (2005) Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science 308(5728):1623-1626. (Pubitemid 40807511)
4. Ambady N, Rosenthal R (1993) Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 64(3):431-441.
5. Ambady N, Rosenthal R (1992) Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 111:256-274.
6. Ballew CC, Todorov A (2007) Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(46):17948-17953.
7. Platz F, Kopiez R (2013) When the first impression counts: Music performers, audience, and the evaluation of stage entrance behavior. Music Sci 17(2):167-197.
8. Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of "blind" auditions on female musicians. Am Econ Rev 90:715-741.
9. Tommasini A (November 10, 2003) A showman revs up the classical genre. NY Times. Available at www.nytimes.com/2003/11/10/arts/music-review-a-showman- revs-up-the-classical-genre.html.
10. von Rhein J (February 9, 2002) Restraint not part of Lang's repertoire. Chicago Tribune. Available at http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2002-02-09/ news/0202090304-1-lang-lang-lower-brass-tchaikovsky-fifth-symphony.
11. Murnighan K, Conlon D (1991) The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Adm Sci Q 36(2):165-186.
12. Sloboda JA, Lamont A, Greasley AE (2008) The Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology, eds Hallam S, Cross I, Thaut M (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 431-440.
13. Benjamin DJ, Shapiro JM (2009) Thin-slice forecasts of gubernatorial elections. Rev Econ Stat 91(33):523-536.
14. Rule NO, Ambady N (2008) The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychol Sci 19(2):109-111.
15. Gabrielsson A (2003) Music performance research at the millennium. Psychol Music 31(3):221-272.
16. Bergeron V, Lopes DM (2009) Hearing and seeing musical expression. Philos Phenomenol Res 78(1):1-16.
17. Burson KA, Larrick RP, Klayman J (2006) Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: How perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(1):60-77. (Pubitemid 43172342)
18. Nisbett RE, Wilson TD (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 84:231-259.
19. McPherson GE, Schubert E (2004) Musical Excellence: Strategies and Techniques to Enhance Performance, ed Williamon A (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 61-82.
20. Greenwald AG, Banaji MR (1995) Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychol Rev 102(1):4-27.
21. Schlenker B, Dlugolecki D, Doherty K (1994) The impact of self-presentations on self-appraisals and behaviors: The power of public commitment. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 20:20-33.
22. Thompson WF, Russo FA (2007) Facing the music. Psychol Sci 18(9):756-757.
23. Sams M, et al. (1991) Seeing speech: Visual information from lip movements modifies activity in the human auditory cortex. Neurosci Lett 127(1):141-145.
24. Platz F, Kopiez R (2012) When the eye listens: A meta-analysis of how audio-visual presentation enhances the appreciation of music performance. Music Percept 30(1):71-83.
25. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385(6614):308. (Pubitemid 27053094)
26. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear: Sound induced visual flashing. Nature 408:788. (Pubitemid 32016079)
27. Shipley T (1964) Auditory flutter-driving of visual flicker. Science 145(3638):1328-1330.
28. Bertelson P, Aschersleben G (1998) Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychon Bull Rev 5:482-489. (Pubitemid 128457707)
29. McGurk H, MacDonald J (1976) Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature 264(5588):746-748.
30. Botvinick M, Cohen J (1998) Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669):756. (Pubitemid 28099666)
31. Lewis JW, Beauchamp MS, DeYoe EA (2000) A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 10(9):873-888.
32. Campanella S, Belin P (2007) Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends Cogn Sci 11(12):535-543. (Pubitemid 350181565)
33. Collignon O, et al. (2008) Audio-visual integration of emotion expression. Brain Res 1242:126-135.
34. de Gelder B, Böcker KB, Tuomainen J, Hensen M, Vroomen J (1999) The combined perception of emotion from voice and face: Early interaction revealed by human electric brain responses. Neurosci Lett 260(2):133-136. (Pubitemid 29066883)
35. de Gelder B, Bertelson P (2003) Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity. Trends Cogn Sci 7(10):460-467.
36. Barnett-Cowan M, Harris LR (2009) Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound. Exp Brain Res 198(2-3):221-231.
37. Harrar V, Harris LR (2008) The effect of exposure to asynchronous audio, visual, and tactile stimulus combinations on the perception of simultaneity. Exp Brain Res 186(4):517-524.
38. Finnäs L (2001) Presenting music live, audio-visually or aurally-does it affect listeners' experiences differently? Br J Music Educ 18(1):55-78.
39. Davidson JW, Malloch S (2009) Communicative Musicality: Exploring the Basis of Human Companionship, eds Malloch S, Trevarthen C (Oxford Univ Press, New York), pp 565-583.
40. Davies S (1994) Musical Meaning and Expression (Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca NY).
41. Fiske HE (1975) Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. J Res Music Educ 23(3):186-196.
42. Fiske HE (1977) Relationship of selected factors in trumpet performance adjudication reliability. J Res Music Educ 25(4):256.
43. Fiske HE (1983) Judging musical performances: Method or madness? J Res Music Educ 1(1):7-10.
44. Bergee MJ (2003) Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. J Res Music Educ 51(2):137.
45. Thompson S, Williamon A (2003) Evaluating evaluation: Musical performance assessment as a research tool. Music Percept 21(1):21-41.
46. Thompson S (2007) Determinants of listeners' enjoyment of a performance. Psychol Music 35(1):20-36.
47. Auslander P (2008) Liveness. Performance in a Mediatized Culture (Routledge, New York).
48. Schonberg H (July 6, 1986) Do today's pianists have the romantic touch? NY Times. Available at www.nytimes.com/1986/07/06/arts/do-today-s-pianists-have- the-romantictouch.html.
49. Castel AD, McCabe DP, Roediger HL, Heitman JL (2007) The dark side of expertise: Domain-specific memory errors. Psychol Sci 18(1):3-5.
50. Englich B, Mussweiler T, Strack F (2006) Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32(2):188-200. (Pubitemid 43171049)
51. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2004) Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment in labor market discrimination. Am Econ Rev 94(4):991-1013.
52. Pager D, Western B, Bonikowski B (2009) Discrimination in low-wage labor markets. Am Sociol Rev 74(5):777-799.
53. Dion KK, Berscheid E, Walster E (1972) What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol 24(3):285-290.
54. Beehr TA, Gilmore DC (1982) Applicant attractiveness as a perceived job relevant variable in selection. Acad Manage J 25:607-617.
55. Biddle J, Hamermesh D (1998) Beauty, productivity, and discrimination: Lawyers' looks and lucre. J Labor Econ 16(1):172-201.
56. Allport GW (1937) Personality: A Psychological Interpretation (Henry Holt, New York).
57. Amabile TM (1983) The Social Psychology Of Creativity (Springer, New York).
58. Ruscio J, Whitney D, Amabile TM (1998) Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: Verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creat Res J 11:243-263. (Pubitemid 128645122)
59. Amabile TM, Kramer SJ (2007) Inner work life: Understanding the subtext of business performance. Harv Bus Rev 85(5):72-83, 144.
60. Barsade S (2002) The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Adm Sci Q 47:644-675.
61. Nummenmaa L, et al. (2012) Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(24):9599-9604.
62. Trainor L, Schmidt L (2003) The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music, eds Peretz I, Zatorre R (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford), pp 310-324.
63. Trehub SE (2003) The developmental origins of musicality. Nat Neurosci 6(7):669-673.
64. Cook SW, Mitchell Z, Goldin-Meadow S (2008) Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition 106(2):1047-1058. (Pubitemid 350265858)
65. Dijkstra K, Kaschak MP, Zwaan RA (2007) Body posture facilitates retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognition 102(1):139-149. (Pubitemid 44855755)
66. Phillips-Silver J, Trainor LJ (2005) Feeling the beat: Movement influences infant rhythm perception. Science 308(5727):1430. (Pubitemid 40791290)
67. Wöllner C, Deconinck FJA, Parkinson J, Hove MJ, Keller PE (2012) The perception of prototypical motion: Synchronization is enhanced with quantitatively morphed gestures of musical conductors. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 38(6):1390-1403.
68. Keller PE, Knoblich G, Repp BH (2007) Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Conscious Cogn 16(1):102-111. (Pubitemid 44881355)
69. Sevdalis V, Keller PE (2011) Captured by motion: Dance, action understanding, and social cognition. Brain Cogn 77(2):231-236.
70. Van Zijl A, Sloboda JA (2010) Performers' experienced emotions in the construction of expressive musical performance: An exploratory investigation. Psychol Music 39(2):196-219.
71. Tsai C, Klayman J, Hastie R (2008) Effects of amount of information on judgment accuracy and confidence. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 107:97-105.
72. Chinander K, Schweitzer M (2003) The input bias: The misuse of input information in judgments of outcomes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 91:243-253. (Pubitemid 36952874)
73. Hsee C (1996) The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 67:247-257.
74. Olivola C, Todorov A (2010) Fooled by first impressions? Reexamining the diagnostic value of appearance-based inferences. J Exp Soc Psychol 46:315-324.
75. Sloboda J (2008) Science and music: The ear of the beholder. Nature 454(7200):32-33.
76. Jerison HJ (1973) Evolution of the Brain and Intelligence (Academic, New York).
77. Jurmain R, Kilgore L, Trevathan W (2008) Essentials of Physical Anthropology (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA).
78. Purves D, Lotto RB (2011) Why We See What We Do Redux: A Wholly Empirical Theory of Vision (Sinauer, Sunderland, MA).
79. Purves D, Wojtach WT, Lotto RB (2011) Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(3, Suppl 3):15588-15595.