Randomized controlled trial: Comparison of two surgical techniques for closing the wound following ileostomy closure: Purse string vs direct suture

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1033-1040

  Dusch, N ^a   Goranova, D ^a   Herrle, F ^a   Niedergethmann, M ^a   Kienle, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Direct suture; Ileostomy closure; Ileostomy reversal; Purse string suture; Surgical site infection

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANTIBIOTIC THERAPY; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE QUESTIONNAIRE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIARRHEA; DIRECT SUTURE; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT AND OBSERVER SCAR ASSESSMENT SCALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PURSESTRING SUTURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; RECTOVAGINAL FISTULA; REOPERATION; SMALL INTESTINE RESECTION; STENOSIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; SUTURING METHOD; TELECONSULTATION; WOUND CLOSURE;

DIRECT SUTURE; ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE; ILEOSTOMY REVERSAL; PURSE STRING SUTURE; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION;

AGED; CICATRIX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84883258575     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12211     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 462-72.
2. Ulrich AB, Seiler C, Rahbari N, Weitz J, Buchler MW. Diverting stoma after low anterior resection: more arguments in favor. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 412-8.
3. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 52-60.
4. Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Elective colon and rectal surgery differ in risk factors for wound infection: results of prospective surveillance. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 758-63.
5. Mileski WJ, Rege RV, Joehl RJ, Nahrwold DL. Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 171: 17-21.
6. Kohler A, Athanasiadis S, Nafe M. [Postoperative results of colostomy and ileostomy closure. A retrospective analysis of three different closure techniques in 182 patients]. Chirurg 1994; 65: 529-32.
7. Hackam DJ, Rotstein OD. Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors. Can J Surg 1995; 38: 144-8.
8. Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M. Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 206-8.
9. Poulsen KB, Bremmelgaard A, Sorensen AI, Raahave D, Petersen JV. Estimated costs of postoperative wound infections. A case-control study of marginal hospital and social security costs. Epidemiol Infect 1994; 113: 283-95.
10. Shulkin DJ, Kinosian B, Glick H, Glen-Puschett C, Daly J, Eisenberg JM. The economic impact of infections. An analysis of hospital costs and charges in surgical patients with cancer. Arch Surg 1993; 128: 449-52.
11. Banerjee A. Pursestring skin closure after stoma reversal. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 993-4.
12. Sutton CD, Williams N, Marshall LJ, Lloyd G, Thomas WM. A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72: 766-7.
13. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 97-132; quiz 3-4; discussion 96.
14. Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommendations for control of surgical site infections. Ann Surg 2011; 253: 1082-93.
15. Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 487-94.
16. van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 514-22.
17. Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA et al. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1960-5; discussion 6-7.
18. Polle SW, Dunker MS, Slors JF et al. Body image, cosmesis, quality of life, and functional outcome of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy: long-term results of a randomized trial. Surg Endosc 2007; 21: 1301-7.
19. Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 2010; 10: e43.
20. Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 2055-63.
21. Morrison TG, Kalin R, Morrison MA. Body-image evaluation and body-image investment among adolescents: a test of sociocultural and social comparison theories. Adolescence 2004; 39: 571-92.
22. Dunker MS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, Ringers J, Griffioen G, Bemelman WA. Cosmesis and body image after laparoscopic-assisted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1334-40.
23. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, Grp C. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000251.
24. Milanchi S, Nasseri Y, Kidner T, Fleshner P. Wound infection after ileostomy closure can be eliminated by circumferential subcuticular wound approximation. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 469-74.
25. Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 463-6.
26. Marquez TT, Christoforidis D, Abraham A, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA. Wound infection following stoma takedown: primary skin closure versus subcuticular purse-string suture. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2877-82.
27. Vermulst N, Vermeulen J, Hazebroek EJ, Coene PP, van der Harst E. Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Management of wound infections is easy without (long-term) complications. Dig Surg 2006; 23: 255-8.
28. Lee JR, Kim YW, Sung JJ et al. Conventional linear versus purse-string skin closure after loop ileostomy reversal: comparison of wound infection rates and operative outcomes. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2011; 27: 58-63.
29. Wong KS, Remzi FH, Gorgun E et al. Loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy: outcome in 1, 504 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 243-50.
30. van de Pavoordt HD, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Lavery IC, Weakley FL. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure in 293 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 1987; 2: 214-7.
31. Lewis P, Bartolo DC. Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1990; 72: 263-5.
32. Wexner SD, Taranow DA, Johansen OB et al. Loop ileostomy is a safe option for fecal diversion. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 349-54.
33. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 2004; 21: 440-6.
34. Khoo RE, Cohen MM, Chapman GM, Jenken DA, Langevin JM. Loop ileostomy for temporary fecal diversion. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 519-22.
35. Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B, Smith SR. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 1511-7.
36. Campbell DA Jr, Henderson WG, Englesbe MJ et al. Surgical site infection prevention: the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion-results of the first American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 810-20.