Conventional linear versus purse-string skin closure after loop ileostomy reversal: Comparison of wound infection rates and operative outcomes

Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 58-63

  Lee, Jung Ryeol ^a   Kim, Young Wan ^a   Sung, Jong Je ^a   Song, Ok Pyung ^a   Kim, Hyung Chul ^a   Lim, Cheol Wan ^a   Cho, Gyu Seok ^a   Jung, Jun Chul ^a   Shin, Eung Jin ^a  

^a Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ileostomy reversal; Linear closure; Purse string closure; Wound infection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FASCIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INFECTION RATE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LINEAR SKIN CLOSURE; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PURSE STRING SKIN CLOSURE; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN INCISION; STOMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SUTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND CLOSURE; WOUND INFECTION;

EID: 84863609944     PISSN: 20937822     EISSN: 20937830     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.2.58     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC, Milsom JW, Church JM, Hull TL, et al. Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:105-13.
2. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2007;246:207-14.
3. Law WI, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. Am J Surg 2000;179:92-6.
4. Edwards DP, Leppington-Clarke A, Sexton R, Heald RJ, Moran BJ. Stoma-related complications are more frequent after transverse colostomy than loop ileostomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2001;88:360-3.
5. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg 2001;25:274-7.
6. Rondelli F, Reboldi P, Rulli A, Barberini F, Guerrisi A, Izzo L, et al. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for fecal diversion after colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:479-88.
7. Hackam DJ, Rotstein OD. Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors. Can J Surg 1995;38:144-8.
8. Garcia-Botello SA, Garcia-Armengol J, Garcia-Granero E, Espi A, Juan C, Lopez-Mozos F, et al. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown. Dig Surg 2004;21:440-6.
9. Banerjee A. Pursestring skin closure after stoma reversal. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:993-4.
10. Sutton CD, Williams N, Marshall LJ, Lloyd G, Thomas WM. A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure. ANZ J Surg 2002;72:766-7.
11. Reid K, Pockney P, Pollitt T, Draganic B, Smith SR. Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds. Br J Surg 2010;97:1511-7.
12. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992;13:606-8.
13. American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA physical status classification system [Internet]. Park Ridge, IL: American Society of Anesthesiologists; c1995-2011 [cited on 2010 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.asahq.org/ clinical/physicalstatus.htm.
14. Williams LA, Sagar PM, Finan PJ, Burke D. The outcome of loop ileostomy closure: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:460-4.
15. Mileski WJ, Rege RV, Joehl RJ, Nahrwold DL. Rates of morbidity and mortality after closure of loop and end colostomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;171:17-21.
16. Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Kuroyanagi H, Ueno M, Oya M, et al. Complications of loop ileostomy closure in patients with rectal tumor. World J Surg 2010;34:1937-42.
17. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999: Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250-78.
18. Song GW, Yu CS, Lee HO, Kim MS, Namgung H, Lee GH, et al. Ileostomy related complications. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2003;19:82-9.
19. Kim JY, Kim JS, Hur H, Min BS, Kim NK, Sohn SK, et al. Complication and relevant factors after an ileostomy for fecal diversion in a patient with rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2009;25:81-7.
20. Kaidar-Person O, Person B, Wexner SD. Complications of construction and closure of temporary loop ileostomy. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:759-73.
21. Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jeyarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S. The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009;24:711-23.