Randomized clinical trial of short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 97, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1511-1517

  Reid, K ^a   Pockney, P ^c   Pollitt, T ^a   Draganic, B ^a,b   Smith, S R ^a,b  

^a JOHN HUNTER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL INFECTION; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

FEMALE; HUMANS; ILEOSTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGICAL WOUND INFECTION; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 77956996789     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: 13652168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7151     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L, Eu KW. Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 2009; 96: 462-472.
2. McGrath DR, Leong DC, Armstrong BK, Spigelman AD. Management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia: the National Colorectal Cancer Care Survey. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 55-64.
3. Phang PT, Hain JM, Perez-Ramirez JJ, Madoff RD, Gemlo BT. Techniques and complications of ileostomy takedown. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 463-466.
4. Hackam DJ, Rotstein OD. Stoma closure and wound infection: an evaluation of risk factors. Can J Surg 1995; 38: 144-148.
5. Vermulst N, Vermeulen J, Hazebroek EJ, Coene PP, van der Harst E. Primary closure of the skin after stoma closure. Management of wound infections is easy without (long-term) complications. Dig Surg 2006; 23: 255-258.
6. Lahat G, Tulchinsky H, Goldman G, Klauzner JM, Rabau M.Wound infection after ileostomy closure: a prospective randomized study comparing primary vs. delayed primary closure techniques. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 206-208.
7. Banerjee A. Purse-string skin closure after stoma reversal. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 993-994.
8. Sutton CD, Williams N, Marshall LJ, Lloyd G, Thomas WM. A technique for wound closure that minimizes sepsis after stoma closure. ANZ J Surg 2002; 72: 766-767.
9. Haase O, RaueW, Böhm B, Neuss H, Scharfenberg M, SchwenkW. Subcutaneous gentamycin implant to reduce wound infections after loop-ileostomy closure: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2025-2031.
10. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical-site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 250-278.
11. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1-55.
12. Ferraz EM, Ferraz AA, Coelho HS, Pereira Viana VP, Sobral SM, Vasconcelos MD et al. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: does judicious monitoring find cases? Am J Infect Control 1995; 23: 290-294.
13. Burns SJ, Dippe SE. Post operative wound infections detected during hospitalization and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982; 10: 60-65.