Implementation of a linear optimization water allocation algorithm into a fully integrated physical hydrology model

Advances in Water Resources

Volumn 60, Issue , 2013, Pages 135-147

  Condon, Laura E ^a,b,c   Maxwell, Reed M ^a,c  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^b U S BUREAU OF RECLAMATION   (United States)

^c ReNUWIt Engineering Research Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Groundwater surface water interactions; Integrated models; Water management; Water resources

Indexed keywords

GROUND WATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGY MODELING; INTEGRATED MODELS; LINEAR OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT DECISIONS; MANAGEMENT SCENARIOS; WATER ALLOCATION MODULE;

AQUIFERS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HYDROLOGY; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; SURFACE WATER RESOURCES; SURFACE WATERS; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; MODEL TEST; MODEL VALIDATION; OPTIMIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WATER DEMAND; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

LITTLE WASHITA BASIN; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883256880     PISSN: 03091708     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aeschbach-Hertic W., Gleeson T. Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletion. Nat Geosci 2012, 15(12):853-861.
2. Taylor R.G., et al. Ground water and climate change. Nat Clim Change 2012.
3. Schoups G., Addams C.L., Minjares J.L., Gorelick S.M. Sustainable conjunctive water management in irrigated agriculture: Model formulation and application to the Yaqui Valley Mexico. Water Resour. Res. 2006, 42:2-9.
4. Tsur Y. The stabilization role of groundwater when surface water supplies are uncertain: the implications for groundwater development. Water Resour Res 1990, 26(5):811-818.
5. McCray K. American agriculture and ground water: bringing issues to the surface. Irrig J 2001, 51(5):27-29.
6. Scanlon B.R., Faunt C.C., Longuevergne L., Reedy R.C., Alley W.M., McGuire V.L., et al. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. PNAS 2012, 109(24):9320-9325.
7. Rodell M., Velicogna I., Famigliette J.S. Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 2009, 460:999-1002.
8. Konikow L.F., Kendy E. Groundwater depletion: a global problem. Hydrogeol J 2005, 13:317-320.
9. Hazard J, Shively D. Conjunctive management of surface and ground water resources in the western United States. Department of Geography, University of Montana: Missoula, Montana; 2011.
10. Jackson B. 440 Wells shut down 2006, The Greeley Tribune, Greeley, CO.
11. U.S. Water News Online. Idaho fighting another snake river water war. U.S. Water News, Online 2006.
12. Dirmeyer P.A., Zeng F.J., Ducharne A., Morril J.C., Koster R.D. The sensitivity of surface fluxes to soil water content in three land surface schemes. J Hydrometerol 2000, 1(2):121-134.
13. Detto M., Montaldo N., Albertson J.D., Mancini M., Katul G. Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy. Water Resour Res 2006, 42:W08419.
14. Chen X.Y., Rubin Y., Ma S.Y., Baldoochi D. Observations and stochastic modeling of soil moisture control on evapotranspiration in a Californian oak savanna. Water Resourc Res 2008, 44(2):W08409.
15. Koster R.D., Dirmeyer P.A., Guo Z., Bonan G., Chan E., Cox P., et al. Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation. Science 2004, 305(5867):1138-1140.
16. Koster R.D., Suarez M.J., Wayne Higgins R., Van den Dool H.M. Observational evidence that soil moisture variations affect Precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 2003, 30(5).
17. DeAngelis A., Dominguez F., Fan Y., Robock A., Kustu M.D., Robinson D. Evidence of enhanced precipitation due to irrigation over the Great Plains of the United States. J Geophys Res 2010, 115:D15115.
18. Ferguson I.M., Maxwell R.M. The role of groundwater in watershed response and land surface feedbacks under climate change. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W00F02.
19. Kollet S.J., Maxwell R.M. Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W02402.
20. Maxwell R.M., Chow F.K., Kollet S.J. The groundwater-land- surface-atmosphere connection: Soil moisture effects on the atmospheric boundary layer in fully-coupled simulations. Adv Water Resour 2007, 30(12):2447-2466.
21. Soylu E., Istanbulluoglu E., Lenters J.D., Wang T. Quantifying the impact of groundwater depth on evapotranspiration in a semi arid grassland region. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2011, 15:787-806.
22. Rihani J.F., Maxwell R.M., Chow F.K. Coupling groundwater and land-surface processes: idealized simulations to identify effects of terrain and subsurface heterogeneity on land surface energy fluxes. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W12523.
23. Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeol J 2002, 10:52-67. 10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8.
24. Hong S.Y., Kalnay E. Role of sea surface temperature and soil-moisture feedback in the 1998 Oklahoma-Texas drought. Nature 2000, 408:842-844.
25. Schubert S.D., Suarez M.J., Pegion P.J., Koster R.D., Bacmeister J.T. On the Cause of the 1930s dust bowl. Science 2004, 303:1855-1859.
26. Ferguson I.M., Maxwell R.M. Hydrologic and land-energy feedbacks of agricultural water management practices. Environ Res Lett 2011, 6(1).
27. Ferguson I.M., Maxwell R.M. Human impacts on terrestrial hydrology: climate change versus pumping and irrigation. Environ Res Lett 2012, 7(4).
28. Gleick P.H. Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 2003, 302:1524-1527.
29. Harou J.J., Pulido-Velazquez M., Rosenberg D.E., Medellin-Azuara J., Lund J.R., Howitt R.E. Hydro-economic models: Concepts, design, applications, and future prospects. J Hydrol 2009, 375:627-643.
30. Yates D., Sieber J., Purkey D., Huber-Lee A. WEAP21 - A demand-, priority-, and preference-driven water planning model, part 1: model characteristics. Water Int 2005, 30(4):487-500.
31. WaterWare: A Resources Management Information System - Palestinian case study Environmental Software Services, P.O. Box 100 A-2352, Gumpoldskirchen, Austria.
32. Labadia JW. Generalized river basin network flow model: Program MODSIM, 1992. Dept. Of Civ. Engrg., Colorado State University: Fort Collins, Colorado.
33. Zagona E.A., Fulp T.J., Shane R., Magee T., Goranflow H.M. Riverware: a generalized tool for complex reservoir system modeling. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2001, 37:913-929.
34. Harbaug AW. MODFLOW-2005. The U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model. 2005.
35. Markstrom SL, Niswonger RG, Regan RS, Prudic DE, Barlow PM. GSFLOW - Coupled Groundwater and Surface water FLOW model based on the integration of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005), U.S.G. Survey, Editor 2008.
36. Sophocleous M., Perkins S.P. Methodology and application of combined watershed and ground-water models in Kansas. J Hydrol 2000, 236(3-4):185-201.
37. Panday S., Brown N., Foreman T., Bredekar V., Kaur J., Huyakorn P.S. Simulating dynamic water supply systems in a fully integrated surface-subsurface flow and transport model. Vadose Zone J 2009, 8(4):858-872.
38. Ramireddygari S.R., Sophocleous M., Koelliker J.K., Perkins S.P., Govindaraju R.S. Development and application of a comprehensive simulation model to evaluate impacts of watershed structures and irrigation water use on streamflow and groundwater: the case of Wet Walnut Creek Watershed, Kansas, USA. J Hydrol 2000, 236:223-246.
39. Perkins S.P., Sophocleous M. Development of a comprehensive watershed model applied to study stream yield under drought conditions. Ground Water 1999, 37(3):418-429.
40. Sophocleous M., Koelliker J.K., Govindaraju R.S., Birdie T., Ramireddyygari S.R., Perkins S.P. Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management-the case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. J Hydrol 1999, 214(1-4):179-196.
41. California Department of Water Resources, Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM v4.0): Theoretical Documentation. M.S.B. Integrated Hydrological Models Development Unit, Editor 2012. Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento.
42. California Department of Water Resources, Integrated Water Flow Model (IWFM v4.0): User's manual, M.S.B. Integrated Hydrological Models Development Unit, Editor 2012: Bay-Delta Office, Sacramento.
43. (DHI), D.H.I., MIKE SHE User manual. Reference Guide, vol. 2, 2007. Denmark: DHI Software.
44. Schmid W, Hanson RT, Maddock T, Leake SA. User Guide for the Farm Process (FMP1 for the U.S. Geological Survey's Modula Three-Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model, MODFLOW-2000, U.S.G. Survey, Editor 2006. Reston, Virginia.
45. Schmid W, Hanson, R.T. The Farm Process Version 2 (FMP2) for MODFLOW-2005 - modifications and upgrades of FMP1 and inclusion into MODFLOW-2005, U.S. Geological Survey, Chapter 32 of Section A, Groundwater, of Book 6, Modeling Techniques, of Series "Techniques and Methods Reports"; 2009. 102p. (). http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/tm6a32/.
46. Hanson R.T., Schmid W., Faunt C.C., Lockwood B. Simulation and analysis of conjunctive use with MODFLOW's farm process. Ground Water 2010, 48(5):674-689.
47. Hanson RT, Schmid W, Lear J, Faunt CC. Simulation of an aquifer-storage-and-recovery (ASR) system using the farm process in MODFLOW for the Pajaro Valley, Monterey Bay. In: Modflow and more-ground water and public policy conference, Golden, CO. 2008.
48. Schmid W, King JP, Maddock TMI. Conjunctive Surface-water/groundwater model in the southern Rincon Valley using MODFLOW-2005 with the Farm Process, N.M.W.R.R. Institute, Editor 2009.
49. Bruner P., Simmons C.T. HydroGeoSphere: a fully integrated, physically based hydrological model. Groundwater 2012, 50(2):170-172.
50. Therrien R. Three-dimensional analysis of variably- saturated flow and solute transport in discretely-fractured porous media. Waterloo, Ont; University of Waterloo: 1992.
51. Bixio AC, Orlandi S, Paniconi C, Putti M. Physically-based distributed model for coupled surface runoff and subsurface flow simulation at the catchment scale. In: Computational methods in water resources, Balkema: 2000.
52. Qu Y., Duffy C.J. A semidiscrete finite volume formulation for multiprocess watershed simulation. Water Resour Res 2007, 43.
53. VanderKwaak J.E., Loague K. Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resour Res 2001, 37:999-1013.
54. Kollet S.J., Maxwell R.M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Adv Water Resour 2006, 29(7):945-958.
55. Maxwell R.M., Kollet S.J. Interdependence of groundwater dynamics and land-energy feedbacks under climate change. Nat Geosci 2008, 1(10):665-669.
56. Dai Y., Zeng X., Dickinson R.E., Baker I., Bonnan G.B., Bosilovich M.G., et al. The common land model. Bull Am Meterorol Soc 2003, 84(8):1013-1023.
57. Ashby S.F., Falgout R.D. A parallel multigrid preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for groundwater flow simulations. Nuclear Sci Eng 1996, 124(1):145-159.
58. Jones J.E., Woodward C.S. Newton-Krylov-Multigrid solvers for large-scale, highly heterogeneous, variably saturated flow problems. Adv Water Resour 2001, 24(7):763-774.
59. Maxwell R.M. A terrain-following grid transform for parallel, large-scale, integrated hydrologic modeling. Adv Water Resour 2013, 53:109-117.
60. Maxwell R.M., Miller N.L. Development of a coupled land surface and groundwater model. J Hydrometerol 2005, 6(3):233-247.
61. Maxwell R.M., Kollet S.J. Quantifying the effects of three dimensional subsurface heterogeneity on Hortonian runoff processes using a coupled numerical, stochastic approach. Adv Water Resour 2008, 31(5):807-817.
62. Kollet S.J. The influence of rain sensible heat and subsurface energy transport on the energy balance at the land surface. Vadose Zone J 2009, 8(4):846-857.
63. Meyerhoff S.B., Maxwell R.M. Quantifying the effects of subsurface heterogeneity on hillslope runoff using a stochastic approach. Hydrogeol J 2011, 19:1515-1530.
64. Gill P.E., Murray W., Wright M.H. Numerical linear algebra and optimization 1992, vol. 1. Addison-Wesley.
65. Miller D.A., White R.A. A conterminous united states multi-layer soil characteristics data set for regional climate and hydrology modeling. Earth Interact 1998, 1998:2.
66. NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC). USGS/Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, ASTER L1B: 2001.
67. Mitchell K.E., Lohmann D., Houser P.R., Wood E.F., Schaake J.C., Robock A., et al. The multi-institution North American land data assimilation system (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system. J Geophys Res 2004, 109:D07S90.
68. Cosgrove B.A., Lohmann D., Mitchell K.E., Houser P.R., Wood E.F., Schaake J.C., et al. Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project. J Geophys Res 2003, 108:D22.
69. Schmid W, Dogrul EC, Hanson RT, Kadir T., Comparison of simulations of land-use specific water demand and irrigation water supply by MF-FMP and IWFM; State of California, CA Natural Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources, Bay-Delta Office, Technical Information Reports of a joint study with the U.S.G.S.; 2011. http://baydeltaoffice.water.ca.gov/modeling/hydrology/IWFM/Publications/downloadables/Reports/IWFM%20and%20MF-FMP%20TIR-2%20(USGS-DWR%20Nov2011).pdf .