On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multisite trial

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 770-777

  Wagner, Todd H ^a   Hattler, Brack ^b,c   Bishawi, Muath ^d   Baltz, Janet H ^b   Collins, Joseph F ^d   Quin, Jacquelyn A ^e   Grover, Frederick L ^b,c   Shroyer, A Laurie W ^b,d  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; BOOTSTRAPPING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH INSURANCE; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; ON PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

23;

AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84883240756     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.074     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Available at http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov/. Accessed March 3, 2012.
2. Department of Veterans Affairs. Patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis of 410x, 411x, 412x, 413x, and 414x.
3. J. Yoon, J.Y. Scott, C.S. Phibbs, and T.H. Wagner Recent trends in Veterans Affairs chronic condition spending Popul Health Manag 14 2011 293 298
4. A.L. Shroyer, F.L. Grover, and B. Hattler On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery N Engl J Med 361 2009 1827 1837
5. M. Hravnak, L.A. Hoffman, M.I. Saul, T.G. Zullo, J.F. Cuneo, and R.V. Pellegrini Short-term complications and resource utilization in matched subjects after on-pump or off-pump primary isolated coronary artery bypass Am J Crit Care 13 2004 499 508
6. D.A. Bull, L.A. Neumayer, J.C. Stringham, P. Meldrum, D.G. Affleck, and S.V. Karwande Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass versus off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass grafting: does eliminating the pump reduce morbidity and cost? Ann Thorac Surg 71 2001 170 175
7. J.D. Puskas, W.H. Williams, and E.M. Mahoney Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial JAMA 291 2004 1841 1849
8. D. Novitzky, A.L. Shroyer, and J.F. Collins A study design to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial Clin Trials 4 2007 81 91
9. T.H. Wagner, S. Chen, and P.G. Barnett Using average cost methods to estimate encounter-level costs for medical-surgical stays in the VA Med Care Res Rev 60 3 Suppl 2003 15S 36S
10. D. Pregibon Logistic regression diagnostics Ann Statist 9 1981 705 724
11. D.W. Hosmer, and S. Lemeshow Applied logistic regression 1989 John Wiley & Sons New York
12. W.G. Manning, A. Basu, and J. Mullahy Generalized modeling approaches to risk adjustment of skewed outcomes data J Health Econ 24 2005 465 488
13. N. Duan Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method J Am Statist Assoc 78 1983 605 610
14. Consumer Price Index, 2010. Available at ftp.bls.gov/pub/special. requests/cpi/cpiai.txt. Accessed March 3, 2012.
15. L.E. Kazis, D.R. Miller, and K.M. Skinner Patient-reported measures of health: The Veterans Health Study J Ambul Care Manage 27 2004 70 83
16. A.J. Selim, W. Rogers, S.X. Qian, J. Brazier, and L.E. Kazis A preference-based measure of health: the VR-6D derived from the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Qual Life Res 20 2011 1337 1347
17. H.A. Glick, J.A. Doshi, S.S. Sonnad, and D. Polsky Economic evaluation in clinical trials 2007 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
18. D. Novitzky, J.H. Baltz, and B. Hattler Outcomes after conversion in the Veterans Affairs randomized on versus off bypass trial Ann Thorac Surg 92 2011 2147 2154
19. T.H. Wagner, and E.H. Cowgill Updating the HERC average cost method: use of 2009 Medicare data and an analysis of CABG surgery 2012 VA Palo Alto, Health Economics Resource Center Menlo Park, CA
20. M. Bishawi, A.L. Shroyer, and J.S. Rumsfeld Changes in health-related quality of life in off-pump versus on-pump cardiac surgery: Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial Ann Thorac Surg 2013 Feb 27 [Epub ahead of print]
21. T.H. Wagner, G. Sethi, and W. Holman Costs and quality of life associated with radial artery and saphenous vein cardiac bypass surgery: results from a Veterans Affairs multisite trial Am J Surg 202 2011 532 535
22. E. Kozora, S. Kongs, and J.F. Collins Cognitive outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery Ann Thorac Surg 90 2010 1134 1141
23. B. Hattler, J.C. Messenger, and A.L. Shroyer Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Trial Circulation 125 2012 2827 2835
24. C.H. Møller, L. Penninga, J. Wetterslev, D.A. Steinbruchel, and C. Gluud Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 2012 CD007224