Outcomes after conversion in the veterans affairs randomized on versus off Bypass trial

Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 2147-2154

  Novitzky, Dimitri ^a   Baltz, Janet H ^b   Hattler, Brack ^b,c   Collins, Joseph F ^d   Kozora, Elizabeth ^b,e   Shroyer, A Laurie ^d   Grover, Frederick L ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e DEPARTMENT OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSISTED CIRCULATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; COMA; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; HEART ARREST; HEART BLOOD VESSEL; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RESUSCITATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STROKE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 81855221338     PISSN: 00034975     EISSN: 15526259     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.122     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. J. Puskas, D. Cheng, and J. Knight Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference Innovations: Technology & Techniques in Cardiothoracic & Vascular Surgery 1 2005 3 27
2. R. Jin, L.F. Hiratzka, G.L. Grunkemeier, A. Krause, and U.S. Page III Aborted off-pump coronary artery bypass patients have much worse outcomes than on-pump or successful off-pump patients Circulation 112 9 Suppl 2005 I332 I337
3. J.F. Légaré, K.J. Buth, and G.M. Hirsch Conversion to on pump from OPCAB is associated with increased mortality: results from a randomized controlled trial Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27 2005 296 301 (Pubitemid 40193140)
4. J.R. Edgerton, T.M. Dewey, and M.J. Magee Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes Ann Thorac Surg 76 2003 1138 1142
5. A.L. Shroyer, F.L. Grover, and B. Hattler On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery N Engl J Med 361 2009 1827 1837
6. J.D. Puskas, M.J. Mack, and C.R. Smith On-pump versus off-pump CABG N Engl J Med 362 2010 851 author reply 853-4
7. D. Novitzky, A.L. Shroyer, and J.F. Collins A study design to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial Clinical Trials 4 2007 81 91
8. J.D. Puskas, W.H. Williams, and E.M. Mahoney Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial JAMA 291 2004 1841 1849 (Pubitemid 38509496)
9. H.M. Nathoe, E. Buskens, and E.W. Jansen Role of coronary collaterals in off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery Circulation 110 2004 1738 1742 (Pubitemid 39299214)
10. A. Zangrillo, F. Annalisa, and G. Crescenzi Underreporting of conversion from off-pump coronary artery bypass Anesthesiology 103 2005 902 903 (Pubitemid 41415543)
11. D.C. Cheng, D. Bainbridge, J.E. Martin, and R.J. Novick Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials Anesthesiology 102 2005 188 203 (Pubitemid 40082856)