Optimal number of questionnaire response categories: More may not be better

SAGE Open

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 1-10

  Jones, W Paul ^a   Loe, Scott A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral sciences; Careers; Education; Educational measurement assessment; Educational psychology counseling; Educational research; Measurement and scaling methods; Research methods; Social sciences

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883226179     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21582440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2158244013489691     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Baron, H. (1996). Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 49-56.
2. Bendig, A. W. (1954). Reliability and the number of rating scale categories. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 38-40.
3. Blaikie, N. (2003). Analysing quantitative data. London, England: SAGE.
4. Bloom, M., Fischer, J., & Orme, J. G. (2003). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Cook, C., Heath, F., Thompson, R. L., & Thompson, B. (2001). Score reliability in web- or Internet-based surveys: Unnumbered graphic rating scales versus Likert-type scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 697-706.
6. Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2009). Nonparametric statistics for the non-statistician. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8. Cowger, E. L., Bickham, P. J., Miller, M. J., & Springer, T. P. (1999). Accuracy of leisure activities finder among high school students. College Student Journal, 33, 444-449.
9. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
10. Grissom, R. J., & Kim, J. J. (2005). Effect sizes for research: A broad practical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13. Iachan, R. (1990). Some extensions of the Iachan congruence index. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 176-180.
14. Jamieson, S. (2004). Likert scales: How to abuse them. Medical Education, 38, 1217-1218.
15. Jones, W. P. (1996). Career assessment for patients with visual disability: Consideration of instrument distortion. Journal of Vision Rehabilitation, 10, 2-7.
16. Jones, W. P. (2009). CogStyle core scale reliability. Retrieved from http://faculty.unlv.edu/pjones/nl8_1.htm
17. Knapp, T. R. (1990). Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: An attempt to resolve the controversy. Nursing Research, 39, 121-123.
18. Krieg, E. F., Jr. (1999). Biases induced by coarse measurement scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 749-766.
19. Larson, L. M., Rottinghaus, P. J., & Borgen, F. H. (2002). Meta-analyses of big six interests and big five personality factors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 217-239.
20. Lietz, P. (2010). Research into questionnaire design: A summary of the literature. International Journal of Market Research, 52, 249-272.
21. Lowen, W. (1982). Dichotomies of the mind: A systems science model of the mind and personality. New York, NY: John Wiley.
22. Mattell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1971). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Study I: Reliability and validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 31, 657-674.
23. Morris, S. B., & DeShon, R. P. (2002). Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs. Psychological Methods, 7, 105-125.
24. Prediger, D., Swaney, K., & Mau, W. (1993). Extending Holland's hexagon: Procedures, counseling applications, and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 71, 422-428.
25. Rodgers, W., Andrews, F., & Herzog, R. (1992). Quality of survey measures: A structural modeling approach. Journal of Official Statistics, 8, 251-275.
26. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Abilities (WJ-III). Itasca, IL: Riverside.