A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 58, Issue 17, 2013, Pages 5851-5866

  Weis, Jared A ^a,b   Miga, Michael I ^a,b,c   Arlinghaus, Lori R ^a   Li, Xia ^a   Chakravarthy, A Bapsi ^b,d   Abramson, Vandana ^b,d   Farley, Jaime ^b,d   Yankeelov, Thomas E ^a,b,c,d,e  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT INGRAM CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^e VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATHEMATICAL MODELS; CONVENTIONAL IMAGING; DIFFUSION-WEIGHTED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MECHANICAL COUPLING; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPIES; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; REACTION-DIFFUSION MODELS; TUMOR GROWTH MODELING;

BIOMECHANICS; CHEMOTHERAPY; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; FORECASTING; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; TUMORS;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ADJUVANT THERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BREAST TUMOR; DIFFUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MECHANICS; PATHOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS;

ADULT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MECHANICAL PROCESSES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883182841     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/17/5851     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson A W, Xie J, Pizzonia J, Bronen R A, Spencer D D and Gore J C 2000 Effects of cell volume fraction changes on apparent diffusion in human cells Magn. Reson. Imag. 18 689-95
2. Atuegwu N C, Arlinghaus L R, Li X, Chakravarthy A B, Abramson V G, Sanders M E and Yankeelov T E 2013 Parameterizing the logistic model of tumor growth by DW-MRI and DCE-MRI data to predict treatment response and changes in breast cancer cellularity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy Trans. Oncol. 6 256-64
3. Atuegwu N C, Arlinghaus L R, Li X, Welch E B, Chakravarthy B A, Gore J C and Yankeelov T E 2011 Integration of diffusion-weighted MRI data and a simple mathematical model to predict breast tumor cellularity during neoadjuvant chemotherapy Magn. Reson. Med. 66 1689-96
4. Atuegwu N C, Colvin D C, Loveless M E, Xu L, Gore J C and Yankeelov T E 2012 Incorporation of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data into a simple mathematical model of tumor growth Phys. Med. Biol. 57 225-40
5. Barr R G 2010 Real-time ultrasound elasticity of the breast initial clinical results Ultrasound Q. 26 61-66
6. Barr R G, Destounis S, Lackey L B, Svensson W E, Balleyguier C and Smith C 2012 Evaluation of breast lesions using sonographic elasticity imaging a multicenter trial J. Ultrasound Med. 31 281-7
7. Cheng G, Tse J, Jain R K and Munn L L 2009 Micro-environmental mechanical stress controls tumor spheroid size and morphology by suppressing proliferation and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells PLoS One 4 e4632
8. Conklin M W, Eickhoff J C, Riching K M, Pehlke C A, Eliceiri K W, Provenzano P P, Friedl A and Keely P J 2011 Aligned collagen is a prognostic signature for survival in human breast carcinoma Am. J. Pathol. 178 1221-32
9. Dresner M A, Rose G H, Rossman P J, Muthupillai R and Ehman R L 1998 Magnetic resonance elastography of the prostate Radiology 209 181
10. Ellingson B M, LaViolette P S, Rand S D, Malkin M G, Connelly J M, Mueller W M, Prost R W and Schmainda K M 2011 Spatially quantifying microscopic tumor invasion and proliferation using a voxel-wise solution to a glioma growth model and serial diffusion MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 65 1131-43
11. Engler A J, Berry M, Sweeney H L and Discher D E 2004 Substrate compliance alters human mesenchymal stem cell morphology Mol. Biol. Cell 15 431a (available at www.ascb.org/files/Past-AM-Meetings/2004-Abstracts.pdf#1652)
12. Engler A J, Berry M, Sweeney H L and Discher D E 2005 Substrate elasticity directs adult mesenchymal stem cell differentiation Biorheology 42 33
13. Engler A J, Feng H, Sweeney H L and Discher D E 2002 Cells on gels: skeletal muscle cell differentiation and adhesion on flexible substrates Mol. Biol. Cell 13 63
14. Garg I and Miga M I 2008 Preliminary investigation of the inhibitory effects of mechanical stress in tumor growth Proc. SPIE 6918 69182L
15. Gevertz J L, Gillies G T and Torquato S 2008 Simulating tumor growth in confined heterogeneous environments Phys. Biol. 5 036010
16. Harpold H L, Alvord E C Jr and Swanson K R 2007 The evolution of mathematical modeling of glioma proliferation and invasion J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 66 1-9
17. Helmlinger G, Netti P A, Lichtenbeld H C, Melder R J and Jain R K 1997 Solid stress inhibits the growth of multicellular tumor spheroids Nat. Biotechnol. 15 778-83
18. Hogea C, Davatzikos C and Biros G 2008 An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects J. Math. Biol. 56 793-825
19. Hogea C S, Murray B T and Sethian J A 2006 Simulating complex tumor dynamics from avascular to vascular growth using a general level-set method J. Math. Biol. 53 86-134
20. Huang S and Ingber D E 2005 Cell tension, matrix mechanics, and cancer development Cancer Cell 8 175-6
21. Kallel F, Price R E, Konofagou E and Ophir J 1999 Elastographic imaging of the normal canine prostate in vitro Ultrason. Imag. 21 201-15
22. Keely P J 2011 Mechanisms by which the extracellular matrix and integrin signaling act to regulate the switch between tumor suppression and tumor promotion J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 16 205-19
23. Kyriacou S K, Davatzikos C, Zinreich S J and Bryan R N 1999 Nonlinear elastic registration of brain images with tumor pathology using a biomechanical model IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 18 580-92
24. Li X, Dawant B M, Welch E B, Chakravarthy A B, Freehardt D, Mayer I, Kelley M, Meszoely I, Gore J C and Yankeelov T E 2009 A nonrigid registration algorithm for longitudinal breast MR images and the analysis of breast tumor response Magn. Reson. Imag. 27 1258-70
25. Li X et al 2010 Validation of an algorithm for the nonrigid registration of longitudinal breast MR images using realistic phantoms Med. Phys. 37 2541-52
26. Lo C M, Wang H B, Dembo M and Wang Y L 2000 Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate Biophys. J. 79 144-52
27. Lorenz A, Ermert H, Sommerfeld H J, Garcia-Schurmann M, Senge T and Philippou S 2000 Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: an innovative technique for tumour-detection Ultraschall Med. 21 8-15
28. Lyshchik A et al 2005 Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography Radiology 237 202-11
29. Martin I, Dozin B, Quarto R, Cancedda R and Beltrame F 1997 Computer-based technique for cell aggregation analysis and cell aggregation in in vitro chondrogenesis Cytometry 28 141-6
30. McKnight A L, Kugel J L, Rossman P J, Manduca A, Hartmann L C and Ehman R L 2002 MR elastography of breast cancer: preliminary results Am. J. Roentgenol. 178 1411-7
31. Miga M I 2003 A new approach to elastography using mutual information and finite elements Phys. Med. Biol. 48 467-80
32. Miga M I, Rothney M P and Ou J J 2005 Modality independent elastography (MIE): potential applications in dermoscopy Med. Phys. 32 1308-20
33. Mohamed A and Davatzikos C 2005 Finite element modeling of brain tumor mass-effect from 3D medical images Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 8 400-8
34. Ou J J, Ong R E, Yankeelov T E and Miga M I 2008 Evaluation of 3D modality-independent elastography for breast imaging: a simulation study Phys. Med. Biol. 53 147-63
35. Paszek M J and Weaver V M 2004 The tension mounts: mechanics meets morphogenesis and malignancy J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 9 325-42
36. Paszek M J, Zahir N, Lakins J N, Johnson K, Rozenberg G, Dembo M, Hammer D A and Weaver V M 2004 Mechano-signaling in mammary morphogenesis and tumorigenesis Mol. Biol. Cell 15 348a (available at www.ascb.org/files/Past-AM- Meetings/2004-Abstracts.pdf#1329)
37. Paszek M J et al 2005 Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype Cancer Cell 8 241-54
38. Pheiffer T S, Ou J J, Ong R E and Miga M I 2011 Automatic generation of boundary conditions using demons nonrigid image registration for use in 3D modality-independent elastography IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58 2607-16
39. Provenzano P P, Inman D R, Eliceiri K W, Beggs H E and Keely P J 2008a Mammary epithelial-specific disruption of focal adhesion kinase retards tumor formation and metastasis in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer Am. J. Pathol. 173 1551-65
40. Provenzano P P, Inman D R, Eliceiri K W, Knittel J G, Yan L, Rueden C T, White J G and Keely P J 2008b Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression BMC Med. 6 11
41. Ratain M J and Eckhardt S G 2004 Phase II studies of modern drugs directed against new targets: if you are fazed, too, then resist RECIST J. Clin. Oncol. 22 4442-5
42. Rockne R, Rockhill J K, Mrugala M, Spence A M, Kalet I, Hendrickson K, Lai A, Cloughesy T, Alvord E C Jr and Swanson K R 2010 Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach Phys. Med. Biol. 55 3271-85
43. Rose G H, Dresner M A, Rossman P J, Felmlee J P, Muthupillai R and Ehman R L 1998 'Palpation of the brain' using magnetic resonance elastography Radiology 209 425
44. Sandrin L et al 2003 Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 1705-13
45. Sinkus R, Siegmann K, Xydeas T, Tanter M, Claussen C and Fink M 2007 MR elastography of breast lesions: understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast-enhanced MR mammography Magn. Reson. Med. 58 1135-44
46. Stein A M, Demuth T, Mobley D, Berens M and Sander L M 2007 A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a three-dimensional in vitro experiment Biophys. J. 92 356-65
47. Swanson K R, Rockne R C, Claridge J, Chaplain M A, Alvord E C Jr and Anderson A R 2011 Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology Cancer Res. 71 7366-75
48. Szeto M D, Chakraborty G, Hadley J, Rockne R, Muzi M, Alvord E C Jr, Krohn K A, Spence A M and Swanson K R 2009 Quantitative metrics of net proliferation and invasion link biological aggressiveness assessed by MRI with hypoxia assessed by FMISO-PET in newly diagnosed glioblastomas Cancer Res. 69 4502-9
49. Tuma R S 2006 Sometimes size doesn't matter: reevaluating RECIST and tumor response rate endpoints J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98 1272-4
50. Wang C H et al 2009 Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model Cancer Res. 69 9133-40
51. Wasserman R and Acharya R 1996 A patient-specific in vivo tumor model Math. Biosci. 136 111-40
52. Yeung T, Georges P C, Flanagan L A, Marg B, Ortiz M, Funaki M, Zahir N, Ming W Y, Weaver V and Janmey P A 2005 Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60 24-34
53. Yin M, Talwalkar J A, Glaser K J, Manduca A, Grimm R C, Rossman P J, Fidler J L and Ehman R L 2007 Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5 1207-13