Reference frames in visual selection

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1296, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 75-87

  Humphreys, Glyn W ^a   Gillebert, Celine R ^a   Chechlacz, Magda ^a   Riddoch, M Jane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Neglect; Reference frame

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PERCEPTION DISORDER; STIMULUS RESPONSE; UNILATERAL NEGLECT; VISION; VISUAL SELECTION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 84883137354     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12256     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bickerton, W.L., D. Samson, J. Williamson & G.W. Humphreys . 2011. Separating forms of neglect using the Apples test validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 25: 567-580.
2. Driver, J. & P.W. Halligan . 1991. Can visual neglect operate in object-cntred coordinates? An affirmative single-case study. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 8: 475-496.
3. Marr, D. 1982. Vision. San Fransisco: W.H. Freeman.
4. Monk, A.F. 1985. Coordinate systems in visual word recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 37: 613-625.
5. Caramazza, A. & A.E. Hillis . 1990. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 7: 391-445.
6. Driver, J., G.C. Baylis, S.J. Goodrich & R.D. Rafal . 1994. Axis based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 32: 1358-1365.
7. Egly, R., J. Driver & R.D. Rafal . 1994. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. 123: 161-171.
8. Posner, M.I. 1980. Orienting of attention. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 32: 3-25.
9. Wilson, K.D, M.G. Woldorff & G.R. Mangun . 2005. Control networks and hemispheric asymmetries in parietal cortex during attentional orienting in different spatial reference frames. Neuroimage 25: 668-683.
10. Behrmann, M. & M. Moscovitch . 1994. Object-centered neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: effects of left-right coordinates of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 6: 1-16.
11. Behrmann, M. & S.P. Tipper . 1994. "Object-based visual attention: evidence from unilateral neglect." In Attention and Performance XV. C.A. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch, Eds.: 351-375. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Tipper, S.P. & M. Behrmann . 1996. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. J. Exp. Psychol. 22: 1261-1278.
13. Calvanio, R., P.N. Petrone & D.N. Levine . 1987. Left visual spatial neglect is both environment-centered and body-centered. Neurology 37: 1179-1183.
14. Farah, M.J., J.L. Brunn, A.B. Wong, et al. 1990. Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: evidence from the neglect syndrome. Neuropsychologia 28: 335-347.
15. Halligan & Marshall. 1991. Left neglect for near but not far space in man. Nature 350: 498-450
16. Cowey, A., M. Small & S. Ellis . 1994. Left visuospatial neglect can be worse in far than near space. Neuropsychologia 32: 1059-1066.
17. Weiss, P.H., J.C. Marshall, G. Wunderlich, et al. 2000. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain 123: 2531-2541.
18. Previc, F.H. 1990. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behav. Brain Sci. 13: 519-542.
19. Forti, S. & G.W. Humphreys . 2008. Lower visual-field sensitivity to object viewpoint and action instruction in search. Psychol. Sci. 19: 42-48
20. Handy, T.C., S.T. Grafton, N.M. Shroff, et al. 2003. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nat. Neurosci. 6: 421-427.
21. Iriki, A., M. Tanaka & Y. Iwamura . 1996. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 7: 2325-2330.
22. Ackroyd, K., M.J. Riddoch, G.W. Humphreys & S. Townsend . 2002. When near becomes far and left becomes right: using a tool to extend extrapersonal visual space in a patient with severe neglect. Neurocase 8: 1-12.
23. Buxbaum, L.J., H.B. Coslett, M.W. Montgomery & M.J. Farah . 1996. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 14: 113-126.
24. Humphreys, G.W. & D. Heinke . 1998. Spatial representation and selection in the brain: neuropsychological and computational constraints. Vis. Cogn. 5: 9-47.
25. Chechlacz, M., P. Rotshtein, W.L. Bickerton, et al. 2010. Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 27: 277-303.
26. Rorden, C., H. Hjaltason, P. Fillmore, et al. 2012. Allocentric neglect strongly associated with egocentric neglect. Neuropsychologia 50: 1151-1157.
27. Yue, Y., W. Song, S. Huo & M. Wang . 2012. Study on the occurrence and neural bases of hemispatial neglect with different reference frames. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93: 156-162.
28. Karnath, H.O., A. Mandler & S. Clavagnier . 2011. Object-based neglect varies with egocentric position. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23: 2983-2993.
29. Driver, J. & A. Pouget . 2000. Object-centered visual neglect, or relative egocentric neglect? J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 542-545.
30. Medina, J., V. Kannan, M.A. Pawlak, et al. 2009. Neural substrates of visuospatial processing in distinct reference frames: evidence from unilateral spatial neglect. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21: 2073-2084.
31. Verdon, V., S. Schwartz, K.O. Lovblad, et al. 2010. Neuroanatomy of hemispatial neglect and its functional components: a study using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. Brain 133: 880-894.
32. Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch . 1994. Attention to within-object and between-object spatial representations. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11: 207-241.
33. Humphreys, G.W. & M.J. Riddoch . 1995. Separate coding of space within and between perceptual objects: evidence from unilateral neglect. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 12: 283-311.
34. Heinke, D. & G.W. Humphreys . 2003. Attention, spatial representation and visual neglect: simulating emergent attention and spatial attention in the selective attention for identification model (SAIM). Psychol. Rev. 110: 29-87.
35. Mavritsaki, E., H.A. Allen & G.W. Humphreys . 2010. Decomposing the neural mechanisms of visual search through model-based analysis of fMRI: top-down excitation, active ignoring and the use of saliency by the right TPJ. Neuroimage 52: 934-946.
36. Mavritsaki, E., D. Heinke, G. Deco & G.W. Humphreys . 2009. Simulating posterior parietal damage in a biologically plausible framework: neuropsychological tests of the search over time and space model. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 26: 343-390.
37. Halligan, P.W. & J.C. Marshall . 1994. Focal and global attention modulate the expression of visuo-spatial neglect: a case study. Neuropsychologia 32: 13-21.
38. Delis, D., L. Robertson & R. Efron . 1986. Hemispheric specialisation of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli. Neuropsychologia 24: 205-214.
39. Humphreys, G.W., W.-L. Bickerton, D. Samson & M.J. Riddoch . 2012. BCoS: Cognitive Profiling after Brain Injury. London: Psychology Press.