The Andrews' principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 275-300

  Prendergast, Michael L ^a   Pearson, Frank S ^b   Podus, Deborah ^a   Hamilton, Zachary K ^c   Greenwell, Lisa ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES   (United States)

Author keywords

Crime outcomes; Drug treatment programs; Drug use outcomes; Meta analysis; Need principle; Responsivity principle; Risk principle

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883135845     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: making quality a matter of policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5(3), 595-602.
2. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati: Anderson.
3. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence: Matthew Bender.
4. Andrews, D. A., & Dowden, C. (2006). Risk principle of case classification in correctional treatment: a meta-analytic investigation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(1), 88-100.
5. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990a). Classification for effective rehabilitation: rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
6. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990b). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically-relevant and psychologically-informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
7. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent pat and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7-27.
8. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model: does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735-755.
9. Bartol, C., & Bartol, A. (2011). Current perspectives in forensic psychology and criminal behavior (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage.
11. Belenko, S. (2006). Assessing released inmates for substance-abuse-related service needs. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 94-113.
12. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley.
13. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (2004). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity 2nd edn. New York: Wiley.
14. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood: Biostat.
15. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
16. Byrne, J. M. (2012). New directions in community supervision: should we target high risk offenders, high risk times, and high risk locations? European Journal of Probation, 4(2), 77-101.
17. CDCR [California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation]. (2007). Expert panel on adult offender reentry and recidivism reduction programs. Sacramento: CDCR.
18. Cécile, M., & Born, M. (2009). Intervention in juvenile delinquency: danger of iatrogenic effects? Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1217-1221.
19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Colorado Division of Probation Services. (2010). Colorado probation and evidence-based practices: A systemic view of the past, present & future of EBP in Colorado probation. Retrieved December 17, 2012 from http://www. courts. state. co. us/userfiles/file/Administration/Probation/APPA_Presentation_Material/EBP_Report. pdf.
21. Correctional Service Canada. (2012). Federal community corrections strategy: Vision to 2020. Ottawa: Correctional Service Canada.
22. Crawley, M. J. (2005). Statistics: An introduction using R. Chichester: Wiley.
23. Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford.
24. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (1999). What works for female offenders? A meta-analytic review. Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 438-452.
25. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42, 449-467.
26. Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: what works! Criminology, 34(4), 575-607.
27. Guastaferro, W. P. (2012). Using the level of service inventory-revised to improve assessment and treatment in drug court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(5), 769-789.
28. Hannah-Moffat, K. (2005). Criminogenic needs and the transformative risk subject: hybridizations of risk/need in penalty. Punishment & Society, 7(1), 29-51.
29. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic.
30. Jolley, J. M., & Kerbs, J. J. (2010). Risk, need, and responsivity: unrealized potential for the international delivery of substance abuse treatment in prison. International Criminal Justice Review, 20(3), 280-301.
31. Koehler, J. A., Lösel, F., Akoensi, T. D., & Humphreys, D. K. (2013). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9(1), 19-43.
32. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Lowenkamp, C. T., & Latessa, E. J. (2004). Understanding the risk principle: How and why correctional interventions can harm low-risk offenders. Topics in Community Corrections (Annual Issue 2004: Assessment Issues for Managers), pp. 3-8.
34. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: what have we learned from 13, 676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 77-93.
35. MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Marsch, L. A. (1998). The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behaviors and criminality: a meta-analysis. Addiction, 93(4), 515-532.
37. McGuire, J. (2004). Understanding psychology and crime: Perspectives on theory and action. Berkshire: Open University Press.
38. NIDA [National Institute on Drug Abuse]. (2012). Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide (3rd ed.). Bethesda: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
39. Ogloff, J. R., & Davis, M. R. (2004). Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: contributions of the risk-need-responsivity approach. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 10(3), 229-242.
40. Pearson, F. S., Prendergast, M., Podus, D., Vazan, P., Greenwell, L., Hamilton, Z. (2012). Meta-analyses of seven of NIDA's principles of drug addiction treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 43, 1-11.
41. Prendergast, M. L., Podus, D., Chang, E., & Urada, D. (2002). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67(1), 53-72.
42. R Development Core Team. (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 2. 10. 0. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 [Web Page]. Retrieved November 4, 2009, from www. R-project. org.
43. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
44. Sharpe, D. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 881-901.
45. Taxman, F. S., & Thanner, M. (2006). Risk, need, and responsivity (RNR): it all depends. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 28-51.
46. Thanner, M. H., & Taxman, F. S. (2003). Responsivity: the value of providing intensive services to high-risk offenders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(2), 137-147.
47. Viechtbauer, W. (2009). Package "metafor" [Web Page]. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from www. metafor-project. org.
48. Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 112-125.
49. Walfish, S. (2006). "A review of statistical outlier methods" in pharmaceutical technology [Web Page]. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from www. statisticaloutsourcingservices. com/Outlier2. pdf.
50. Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the risk-need-responsivity model: a theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 12(2), 208-228.
51. Wilson, D. B. (2006). Meta-analysis stuff [Web Page]. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from http://mason. gmu. edu/~dwilsonb/ma. html.