A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of young offender treatment programs in Europe

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 19-43

  Koehler, Johann A ^a   Lösel, Friedrich ^a,b   Akoensi, Thomas D ^a   Humphreys, David K ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crime prevention; Meta analysis; Offender rehabilitation; Recidivism; Systematic review; Young offenders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874212967     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-012-9159-7     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. *Andrée Löfholm, C., Olsson, T., Sundell, K., & Hansson, K. (2009). Multisystemic Therapy with conduct-disordered young people: Stability of treatment outcomes two years after intake. Evidence and Policy, 5(4), 373-397.
2. Andrews, D. (1995). The psychology of criminal conduct and effective treatments. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp. 63-78). New York: Wiley.
3. Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The Psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). Newark: LexisNexis.
4. Andrews, D., Zinger, I., Hoge, R., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369-404.
5. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or needs assessment. Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 7-27.
6. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. (2011). The Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) model: does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 735-755.
7. Aos, S., Phipps, P., Barnoski, R., & Lieb, R. (2001). The comparative costs and benefits of programs to reduce crime, 4th ed. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from http://www. wsipp. wa. gov/rptfiles/costbenefit. pdf.
8. Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: What works and what does not. Olympia: Washington State Institute of Public Policy.
9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: Wiley.
10. *Bottoms, A. E. (1995). Intensive community supervision for young offenders: Outcomes, process and cost. (Cambridge, UK: Institute of Criminology)
11. Bottoms, A., Dignan, J., et al. (2004). Youth justice in Great Britain. In M. Tonry & A. Doob (Eds.), Youth crime and youth justice: Comparative and cross-national perspectives. Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 31, pp. 21-183). Chicago: University of Chicago.
12. Brayford, J., Cowe, F., & Deering, J. (2010). What else works - Back to the future? In J. Brayford, F. Cowe, & J. Deering (Eds.), What else works? Creative work with offenders (pp. 254-268). Portland: Willan.
13. *Cann, J., Falshaw, L., & Friendship, C. (2005). Understanding 'What Works': Accredited cognitive skills programmes for young offenders. Youth Justice, 5(3), 165-179.
14. Cleland, C., Pearson, F., Lipton, D., & Yee, D. (1997). Does age make a difference? A meta-analytic approach to reductions in criminal offending for juveniles and adults. San Diego: Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Criminology.
15. *Curran, D., Kilpatrick, R., Young, V., & Wilson, D. (1995). Longitudinal aspects of reconviction: Secure and open intervention with juvenile offenders in Northern Ireland. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 24(2), 97-123.
16. Doob, A. N., & Tonry, M. (2004). Varieties of youth justice. In M. Tonry & A. Doob (Eds.), Youth crime and youth justice: Comparative and cross-national perspectives. Crime and justice: A review of research, vol. 31 (pp. 1-20). Chicago: University of Chicago.
17. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. (1999). What works in young offender treatment: a meta-analysis. Forum on Corrections Research, 11(2), 21-24.
18. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. (2003). Does family intervention work for delinquents? Results of a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45(3), 327-342.
19. Dünkel, F., & Pruin, I. (2010). Young adult offenders in the criminal justice systems of European countries. In F. Dünkel, J. Grzywa, P. Horsfield, & I. Pruin (Eds.), Juvenile justice systems in Europe: Current situation and reform developments, vol. 4 (pp. 1557-1580). Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.
20. Durlauf, S. N., & Nagin, D. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: can both be reduced? Criminology and Public Policy, 10(1), 13-54.
21. Eisner, M. (2009). No effects in independent prevention trials: can we reject the cynical view? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(2), 163-183.
22. Farrington, D. (1986). Age and crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research, vol. 7 (pp. 189-250). Chicago: University of Chicago.
23. Farrington, D. P. (2003). Methodological quality standards for evaluation research. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 49-68.
24. Farrington, D., Ditchfield, J., Hancock, G., Howard, P., Jolliffe, D., Livingston, M., et al. (2002). Evaluation of two intensive regimes for young offenders. Home Office Research Study 239. London: Home Office.
25. Garrido, V., Morales, L. A., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2006). What works for serious juvenile offenders? A systematic review. Psicothema, 18(3), 611-619.
26. Gensheimer, L., Mayer, J., Gottschalk, R., & Davidson, W., II. (1986). Diverting youth from the juvenile justice system: A meta-analysis of intervention efficacy. In S. Apter & A. Goldstein (Eds.), Youth violence: Programmes and prospects (pp. 39-57). Elmsford: Pergamon.
27. Gottschalk, R., Davidson, W., II, Gensheimer, L., & Mayer, J. (1987). Community-based interventions. In H. Quay (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 266-289). New York: Wiley.
28. Hamilton, L., Koehler, J. A., & Lösel, F. (2011) Programmes to reduce reoffending throughout Europe: Three surveys on current practice. Final report of the project 'Strengthening transnational approaches to reducing reoffending', Appendix D. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from https://webmail. springer-sbm. com/owa/redir. aspx?C=23b359279c184631ba3922062a783e9d& URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww. cepprobation. org%2fuploaded_files%2fRep%2520STARR%2520ENG. pdf.
29. Hanson, R. K., Gordon, A., Harris, A., Marques, J. K., et al. (2002). First report of the collaborative outcome data project on the effectiveness of psychological treatment for sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 14(2), 169-194.
30. Hanson, R. K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(9), 865-891.
31. Harper, G., & Chitty, C. (Eds.). (2005). The Impact of corrections on reoffending: A review of 'What Works', 2nd ed. Home Office Research Study 291. London: Home Office.
32. Hasselblad, V., & Hedges, L. V. (1995). Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 167-168.
33. Hollin, C. (2002). Risk-Needs assessment and allocation to offender programmes. In J. McGuire (Ed.), Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce reoffending (pp. 309-332). Chichester: Wiley.
34. Hollin, C. R. (2008). Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: does only randomization glister? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 8, 89-106.
35. Hollin, C., & Palmer, E. J. (2009). Cognitive skills programmes for offenders. Psychology Crime & Law, 15(2), 147-164.
36. Janson, C.-G. (2004). Youth justice in Sweden. In M. Tonry & A. Doob (Eds.), Youth crime and youth justice: Comparative and cross-national perspectives. Crime and justice: A review of research, vol. 31 (pp. 391-441). Chicago: University of Chicago.
37. *Kruissink, M. (1990). The Halt program: Diversion of juvenile vandals. Dutch penal law and policy: Notes on criminological research from the research and documentation centre. The Hague: Ministry of Justice.
38. Landenberger, N., & Lipsey, M. (2005). The positive effects of cognitive-behavioural programs for offenders: a meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 451-476.
39. Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2003). Treating youth in conflict with the law: A new meta-analysis. Rep. RR03YJ-3e. Ottawa: Department of Justice.
40. Lipsey, M. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In T. Cook, H. Cooper, D. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. Hedges, R. Light, T. Louis, & F. Mosteller (Eds.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook (pp. 83-127). New York: Russell Sage.
41. Lipsey, M. (2003). Those confounded moderators in meta-Analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 69-81.
42. Lipsey, M., & Cullen, F. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.
43. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313-345). London: Sage.
44. Lipsey, M., Chapman, G., & Landenberger, N. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 144-157.
45. Lipsey, M., Petrie, C., Weisburd, D., & Gottfredson, D. (2006). Improving evaluation of anti-crime programs: summary of a National Research Council report. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(3), 271-307.
46. *Little, M., Kogan, J., Bullock, R., & van der Laan, P. (2004). ISSP: An experiment in multi-systemic responses to persistent young offenders known to children's services. British Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 225-240.
47. Lloyd, C., Mair, G., & Hough, M. (1994). Explaining reconviction rates: A critical analysis. Home Office Research Study 136. London: HMSO.
48. *Lobley, D., & Smith, D. (2007). Persistent young offenders: An evaluation of two projects. (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate).
49. Lösel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending. Guidelines from research and practice (p. 79). Chichester: Wiley.
50. Lösel, F. (2000). The efficacy of sexual offender treatment: A review of German and international evaluations. In P. J. van Koppen & N. H. M. Roos (Eds.), Rationality, information and progress in psychology and law (pp. 145-170). Maastricht: Metajuridica Publications.
51. Lösel, F. (2012a). Offender treatment and rehabilitation: What works? In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 986-1016). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
52. Lösel, F. (2012b). Towards a third phase of 'what works' in offender rehabilitation. In R. Loeber & B. C. Welsh (Eds.), The future of criminology (pp. 196-203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
53. Lösel, F., & Beelmann, A. (2003). Effects of child skills training in preventing antisocial behaviour: a systematic review of randomized evaluations. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 587(1), 84-109.
54. Lösel, F., & Köferl, P. (1989). Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: A meta-analysis. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system (pp. 334-355). New York: Springer.
55. Lösel, F., & Pomplun, O. (1998). Jugendhilfe statt untersuchungshaft: Eine evaluationsstudie zur heimunterbringung. Studien und materialen zum straf- und massregelvollzug, vol. 7. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.
56. Lösel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2005). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(1), 117-146.
57. Lösel, F., Köferl, P., & Weber, F. (1987). Meta-evaluation der sozialtherapie. Stuttgart: Enke.
58. Lösel, F., Bottoms, A. E., & Farrington, D. P. (Eds.). (2012). Young adult offenders. Lost in transition? Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
59. Lowenkamp, C., Latessa, A., & Holsinger, A. (2006). The risk principle in action: what have we learned from 13, 676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime and Delinquency, 52(1), 77-93.
60. MacKenzie, D. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge.
61. Maguire, M., Grubin, D., Lösel, F., & Raynor, P. (2010). 'What works' and the correctional services accreditation panel: taking stock from an inside perspective. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 10, 37-58.
62. McGuire, J. (2002). Motivation for what? Effective programmes for motivated offenders. In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change: A guide to enhancing engagement in therapy (pp. 157-172). Chichester: Wiley.
63. McMurran, M. (2002). Motivation to change: selection criterion or treatment need? In M. McMurran (Ed.), Motivating offenders to change (pp. 3-13). Chichester: Wiley.
64. *McMurran, M., & Boyle, M. (1990). Evaluation of a self-help manual for young offenders who drink: A pilot study. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 117-119
65. Ministry of Justice (UK). (2010). Compendium of reoffending statistics and analysis. Ministry of Justice Statistics Bulletin. London: Ministry of Justice.
66. *Mitchell, J., & Palmer, E. (2004). Evaluating the 'Reasoning and Rehabilitation' program for young offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 39(4), 31-45
67. *Newburn, T., & Shiner, M. (2005). Dealing with disaffection: Young people, mentoring and social inclusion. (Cullompton, UK: Willan).
68. *Ogden, T., & Hagen, K. (2006). Multisystemic treatment of serious behaviour problems in youth: Sustainability of effectiveness two years after intake. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 11(3), 142-149.
69. *Ogden, T., Hagen, K., & Andersen, O. (2007). Sustainability of the effectiveness of a programme of Multisystemic Treatment (MST) across participant groups in the second year of operation. Journal of Children's Services, 2(3), 4-14.
70. Pearson, F. S., Lipton, D. S., Cleland, C. M., & Yee, D. S. (2002). The effects of behavioral/cognitive-behavioral programs on recidivism. Crime & Delinquency, 48, 476-496.
71. *Raynor, P., & Vanstone, M. (1997). Straight Thinking on Probation (STOP), The Mid Glamorgan experiment. Probation Studies Unit Report, 4. (Oxford, UK: Centre for Criminological Research).
72. Redondo, S., Sánchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (1999). The Influence of treatment programmes on the recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders: An European meta-analytic review. Psychology, Crime and Law, 5(3), 251-278.
73. Redondo, S., Sánchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (2001). Treatment of offenders and recidivism: assessment of the effectiveness of programmes applied in Europe. Psychology in Spain, 5(1), 47-62.
74. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury: Sage.
75. *Scholte, E., & Smit, M. (1988). Early social assistance for juveniles at risk. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 32(3), 209-218.
76. *Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Atkinson, H., Dignan, J., Edwards, L., Hibbert, J., Howes, M., Johnstone, J., Robinson, G., & A. Sorsby. (2008). Does restorative justice affect reconviction? The fourth report from the evaluation of three schemes. Ministry of Justice Research Series, 10/08. (London, UK: Home Office)
77. *Slot, N. (1983). The implementation and evaluation of a residential social skills training program for youth in trouble. (In W. Everaerd, C. Hindley, A. Bot, & J. J. van der Werf, (Eds.), Development in adolesence: Psychological, social, and biological aspects (pp. 192-205). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Marinus Nijhoff.)
78. *Slot, N., & Bartels, A. (1983). Outpatient social skills training for youth in trouble; theoretical background, practice and outcome. (In W. Everaerd, C. Hindley, A. Bot, & J. J. van der Werf, (Eds.), Development in adolesence: Psychological, social, and biological aspects (pp. 176-191). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Marinus Nijhoff.).
79. St. James-Roberts, I., Greenlaw, G., Simon, A., & Hurry, J. (2005). National evaluation of Youth Justice Board mentoring schemes 2001 to 2004. (London, UK: Youth Justice Board).
80. *Sundell, K., Hansson, K., Andrée Löfholm, C., Olsson, T., Gustle, L.-H., & Kadesjö, K. (2008). The transportability of Multisystemic Therapy to Sweden: Short-term results from a randomized trial of conduct-disordered youths. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 550-560.
81. Tong, L. S. J., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). How effective is the Reasoning and Rehabilitation programme in reducing offending? A meta-analysis of evaluations in four countries. Psychology, Crime and Law, 12, 3-24.
82. Tournier, P., & Barre, M. (1990). Enquête sur les systèmes pénitentiaires dans les membres du Conseils de l'Europe: Démographie carcérale comparée. Bulletin d'Information Pénitentiaire, 15, 4-44.
83. Ttofi, M., Farrington, D., & Baldry, A. (2008). Effectiveness of programmes to reduce school bullying: a systematic review. Stockholm: Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet - Brå).
84. Villetaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006) The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sentences on re-offending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13.
85. Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(3), 243-257.
86. Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation. New York: Routledge.
87. Weermann, F. (2007). Juvenile offending. (In M. Tonry, & C. Bijleveld, (Eds.), Crime and justice in the Netherlands. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 35 (pp. 261-318). Chicago: University of Chicago.).
88. Weisburd, D., Lum, C., & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 50-70.
89. Welsh, B., & Farrington, D. (2001). A review of research on the monetary value of preventing crime. In B. Welsh, D. Farrington, & L. Sherman (Eds.), Costs and benefits of preventing crime (pp. 87-122). Oxford: Westview.
90. Wilson, D. (2009). Missing a critical piece of the pie: simple document search strategies inadequate for systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5(4), 429-440.
91. Wilson, D., Bouffard, L., & MacKenzie, D. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(2), 172-204.