Meta-analyses of seven of the National Institute on Drug Abuse's principles of drug addiction treatment

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-11

  Pearson, Frank S ^a   Prendergast, Michael L ^b   Podus, Deborah ^b   Vazan, Peter ^a   Greenwell, Lisa ^c   Hamilton, Zachary ^d  

^a NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c RMC RESEARCH CORPORATION   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug addiction treatment services; Drug use outcomes; Meta analysis; Principles of drug addiction treatment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG USE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED PRINCIPLE OF TREATMENT; HEALTH CARE NEED; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; META ANALYSIS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT COUNSELING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

DIRECTIVE COUNSELING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE (U.S.); RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84861906595     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: 18736483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.005     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Comprehensive meta-analysis 2005, Biostat, Englewood, NJ.
2. Brewer D.D., Catalano R.F., Haggerty K., Gainey R.R., Fleming C.B. A meta-analysis of predictors of continued drug use during and after treatment for opiate addiction. Addiction 1998, 93:73-92.
3. Burke B.L., Arkowitz H., Menchola H. The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2003, 71:843-861.
4. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1988, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Copenhaver M., Lee I.C., Harman J., Johnson B.T., Carey M. Behavioral HIV risk reduction among injection drug users: Meta-analytic evidence of efficacy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2006, 31:163-171.
6. Crawley M.J. Statistics: An introduction using R 2005, Wiley, Chichester, England.
7. Drake R.E., O'Neal E.L., Wallach M.A. A systematic review of psychosocial research on psychosocial interventions for people with co-occurring severe mental and substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2008, 34:123-138.
8. Dumaine M. Meta-analysis of interventions with co-occurring disorders of severe mental illness and substance abuse: Implications for social work practice. Research on Social Work Practice 2003, 13:142-165.
9. Dutra L., Stathopoulou G., Basden S.L., Leyro T.M., Powers M.B., Otto M.W. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 2008, 165:179-187.
10. Farre M., Mas A., Torrens M., Moreno V., Cami J. Retention rate and illicit opioid use during methadone maintenance interventions: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2002, 65:283-290.
11. Gowing L.R., Farrell M., Bornemann R., Sullivan L.E., Ali R.L. Methadone treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of HIV infection. Journal of General Internal Medicine 2006, 21:193-195.
12. Griffith J.D., Rowan-Szal G.A., Roark R.R., Simpson D.D. Contingency management in outpatient methadone treatment: A meta-analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2000, 58:55-66.
13. What if there were no more significance tests? 1997, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. L.L. Harlow, S.A. Mulaik, J.H. Steiger (Eds.).
14. Irvin J.E., Bowers C.A., Dunn M.E., Wang M.C. Efficacy of relapse prevention: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1999, 67:563-570.
15. Johansson B.A., Berglund M., Lindgren A. Efficacy of maintenance treatment with naltrexone for opioid dependence: A meta-analytical review. Addiction 2006, 101:491-503.
16. Krantz D.H. The null hypothesis testing controversy in psychology. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1999, 94:1372-1381.
17. Lees J., Manning N., Rawlings B. A culture of enquiry: Research evidence and the therapeutic community. Psychiatric Quarterly 2004, 75:279-294.
18. Lipsey M.W. Those confounded moderators in meta-analysis: Good, bad, and ugly. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2003, 587:69-81.
19. Lipton D.S., Pearson F.S., Cleland C.M., Yee D. The effects of therapeutic communities and milieu therapy on recidivism: Meta-analytic findings from the Correctional Drug Abuse Treatment Effectiveness (CDATE) study. Offender rehabilitation and treatment: Effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending 2003, 39-77. John Wiley, London. J. McGuire (Ed.).
20. Loftus G.R. Psychology will be a much better science when we change the way we analyze data. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1996, 5:161-171.
21. Lussier J.P., Heil S.H., Mongeon J.A., Badger G.J., Higgins S.T. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006, 101:192-203.
22. Magill M., Ray L.A. Cognitive-behavioral treatment with adult alcohol and illicit drug users: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2009, 70:516-527.
23. Marsch L.A. The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behaviors and criminality: A meta-analysis. Addiction 1998, 93:515-532.
24. Mattick R.P., Breen C., Kimber J., Davoli M. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3, Art. No.: CD002209. 10.1002/14651858.CD002209.pub2.
25. Mitchell O., Wilson D.B., MacKenzie D.L. The effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment on criminal behavior. Campbell Collaboration Systematic Review 2006, Available at. http://www.campbellcollaboration.org/frontend2.asp?ID=122.
26. National Institute on Drug Abuse Principles of drug addiction treatment 1999, [Web Page]. Originally retrieved June 20, 2002, from http://www.drugabuse.gov/PODAT/PODATIndex.html. Second edition (2009) is available at http://www.drugabuse.gov/PODAT/.
27. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research report series-Therapeutic community 2002, [Web Page], [2011, April 17]. http://www.nida.nih.gov/researchreports/therapeutic/default.html.
28. National Institute on Drug Abuse Principles of drug addiction treatment [Second Edition] 2009, [Web Page], [2011, April 11]. http://www.drugabuse.gov/PODAT/PODATIndex.html.
29. Parhar K.K., Wormith J.S., Derkzen D.M., Beauregard A.M. Offender coercion in treatment: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008, 35:1109-1135.
30. Powers M.B., Vedel E., Emmelkamp P.M.G. Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 2008, 28:952-962.
31. Prendergast M.L., Podus D., Chang E., Urada D. The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2002, 67:53-72.
32. Prendergast M., Podus D., Finney J., Greenwell L., Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction 2006, 101:1546-1560.
33. Prendergast M.L., Urada D., Podus D. Meta-analysis of HIV risk-reduction interventions within drug abuse treatment programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2001, 69:389-405.
34. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index Version 2.10.0 R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2009, [Web Page], [2009, November 4]. http://www.R-project.org.
35. Rosenthal R., Rosnow R.L., Rubin D.B. Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach 2000, Cambridge University Press, New York.
36. Schmidt F., Hunter J. Are there benefits from NHST?. American Psychologist 2002, 57:65-71.
37. Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review 1997, 17:881-901.
38. Smith L.A., Gates S., Foxcroft D. Therapeutic communities for substance related disorder. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD005338 2006, 10.1002/14651858.CD005338.pub2.
39. Stanton M.D., Shadish W.R. Outcome, attrition, and family-couples treatment for drug abuse: A meta-analysis and review of the controlled, comparative studies. Psychological Bulletin 1997, 122:170-191.
40. Vanderplasschen W., Wolf J., Rapp R.C., Broekaert E. Effectiveness of different models of case management for substance-abusing populations. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2007, 39:81-85.
41. Viechtbauer W. Package "metafor" 2009, [Web Page], [2009, November 4]. http://www.wvbauer.com/.
42. Walfish S. A review of statistical outlier methods in pharmaceutical technology 2006, [Web Page]. Retrieved December 4, 2009, from. http://www.statisticaloutsourcingservices.com/Outlier2.pdf.
43. Wilkinson L., Task Force on Statistical Inference Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist 1999, 54:594-604.
44. Wilson D.B. Meta-analysis stuff 2006, [Web Page]. URL, [2007, October 26]. http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html.