Relational databases as a massive information source for defeasible argumentation

Knowledge-Based Systems

Volumn 51, Issue , 2013, Pages 93-109

  Deagustini, Cristhian A D ^a,b,c   Fulladoza Dalibón, Santiago E ^a,b,c   Gottifredi, Sebastián ^a,c   Falappa, Marcelo A ^a,c   Chesñevar, Carlos I ^a,c   Simari, Guillermo R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL SUR   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ENTRE RÍOS   (Argentina)

^c Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Argument supporting data retrieval; Defeasible argumentation; Knowledge based systems; Massive argumentation; Relational databases

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; DATA RETRIEVAL; DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTATION; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMMING; KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPLICATIONS; MASSIVE ARGUMENTATION; REAL WORLD ENVIRONMENTS; RELATIONAL DATABASE;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84883055197     PISSN: 09507051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.010     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. T. Bench-Capon, and P.E. Dunne Argumentation in artificial intelligence Artificial Intelligence 171 2007 619 641
2. I. Rahwan, and G.R. Simari Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2009 Springer
3. N.K. Janjua, F.K. Hussain, and O.K. Hussain Semantic information and knowledge integration through argumentative reasoning to support intelligent decision making Information Systems Frontiers 15 2 2013 167 192
4. S. Modgil, F. Toni, F. Bex, I. Bratko, C.I. Chesñevar, W. Dvŏrák, M.A. Falappa, X. Fan, S.A. Gaggl, A.J. García, M.P. González, T.F. Gordon, J. a. Leite, M. Moz̆ina, C. Reed, G.R. Simari, S. Szeider, P. Torroni, S. Woltran, Agreement Technologies, Law, Governance and Technology, vol. 8, Springer, New York, 2013 (Ch. 21: The Added Value of Argumentation: Examples and Challenges, pp. 357-404).
5. G.R. Simari, A brief overview of research in argumentation systems, in: Fifth International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2011), 2011, pp. 81-95.
6. R.P. Loui Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference Computational Intelligence 3 1987 100 106
7. D. Nute Defeasible reasoning: a philosophical analysis in PROLOG Aspects of Artificial Intelligence 1988 251 288
8. G.R. Simari, A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation, Ph.D. thesis, Washington University, Dep. of Comp. Science, December 1989.
9. G.R. Simari, and R.P. Loui A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation Artificial Intelligence 53 2-3 1992 125 157
10. H. Prakken, and G. Sartor Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 1 1997 25 75
11. A.J. García, and G.R. Simari Defeasible logic programming an argumentative approach Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4 1-2 2004 95 138
12. L. Amgoud, S. Kaci, An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases: the prioritized case, in: Fourth European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2005), Springer, 2005, pp. 527-538.
13. P.M. Dung, R.A. Kowalski, and F. Toni Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation Artificial Intelligence 170 2 2006 114 159
14. H. Prakken An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments Argument and Computation 1 2010 93 124
15. J.W. Lloyd Foundations of Logic Programmming 1987 Springer Verlag
16. U. Nilsson, J. Maluszynski, Logic, Programming and Prolog, second ed., John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1995, (A free copy could be obtained from the authors in http://www.ida.liu.se/ulfni/lpp).
17. V. Lifschitz Foundations of logic programs Principles of Knowledge Representation 1996 CSLI Pub. 69 128
18. M. Gelfond Answer sets Handbook of Knowledge Representation, Foundations of Artificial Intelligence 2008 Elsevier 285 316 (Ch. 7)
19. M. Capobianco, C.I. Chesñevar, and G.R. Simari Argumentation and the dynamics of warranted beliefs in changing environments Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11 2 2005 127 151
20. C.A.D. Deagustini, S.E. Fulladoza Dalibón, S. Gottifredi, M.A. Falappa, C.I. Chesñevar, G.R. Simari, Supporting defeasible argumentation processes over relational databases, in: 9th International Workshop. on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS, 2012 (in press).
21. M.V. Martinez, A.J. García, G.R. Simari, On the use of presumptions in structured defeasible reasoning, in: Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012), 2012, pp. 185-196.
22. W.A. Carnielli, J. Marcos, Ex contradictione non sequitur quodlibet, in: II Annual Conference on Reasoning and Logic, 2001, pp. 89-109.
23. C. Chesñevar, A. Maguitman, and M. González Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2009 Springer Verlag
24. M. Thimm, Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using defeasible logic programming, in: Sixth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2009), 2009, pp. 175-194.
25. S.A. Gómez, C.I. Chesñevar, and G.R. Simari Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies through argumentation Applied Artificial Intelligence 24 1 & 2 2010 102 148
26. I. Rahwan Mass argumentation and the semantic web Journal of Web Semantics 6 1 2008 29 37
27. Website , November 2012.
28. Website, MovieLens < http://www.movielens.org/ >, November 2012.
29. C.I. Chesñevar, A.G. Maguitman, G.R. Simari, A first approach to argument-based recommender systems based on defeasible logic programming, in: 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2004), 2004, pp. 109-117.
30. P. Rob, and C. Coronel Database Systems Design fifth ed. Implementation and Management 2002 Course Technology Press Boston, MA, United States
31. P.A. Bernstein, and E. Newcomer Principles of Transaction Processing second ed. 2009 Morgan Kaufman
32. L. Cecchi, P. Fillottrani, G.R. Simari, On the complexity of delp through game semantics, in: 11th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning (NMR 2006), 2006, pp. 386-394.
33. J.B. Grimson Integrating knowledge-based systems and databases Clinica Chimica Acta 222 1993 101 115
34. E. Laenens, and D. Vermeir Advanced knowledge-base environments for large database systems Knowledge-Based Systems 3 4 1990 215 220
35. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth From data mining to knowledge discovery in databases AI Magazine 17 3 1996 37
36. L.A. Kurgan, and P. Musilek A survey of knowledge discovery and data mining process models The Knowledge Engineering Review 21 2006 1 24
37. D. Michie Machine learning: principles and techniques: Richard forsyth Knowledge Based Systems 3 1 1990 59
38. M. Williams, G. Chen, D. Ferbrache, P. Massey, S. Salvini, H. Taylor, and K. Wong Prolog and deductive databases Knowledge-Based Systems 1 3 1988 188 192
39. R. Ramakrishnan, and J.D. Ullman A survey of research on deductive database systems Journal of Logic Programming 23 1993 125 149
40. M. Jarke, Y. Vassiliou, Coupling expert systems with database management systems, Information Systems Working Papers Series, 1983.
41. T. Imanaka, K. Uehara, and J. Toyoda Integration of prolog and databases in both evaluational and non-evaluational approaches Knowledge-Based Systems 2 4 1989 203 209
42. C.L. Chang, A. Walker, PROSQL: a Prolog programming interface with SQL/DS, in: First International Workshop on Expert Database Systems, 1986, pp. 233-246.
43. S. Ceri, G. Gottlob, and G. Wiederhold Efficient database access from prolog IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 15 2 1989 153 164
44. R.J. Lucas, G.A. Le Vine, Prolog and Databases: Implementations and New Directions, Halsted Press, New York, NY, USA, 1988 (Ch. A Prolog-relational database interface, pp. 67-80).
45. S. Ceri, G. Gottlob, and L. Tanca What you always wanted to know about datalog (and never dared to ask) IEEE Transactions on Knowledge Data Engineering 1 1 1989 146 166
46. R. Girle, D. Hitchcock, P. Mcburney, B. Verheij, Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003 (Ch. Decision Support For Practical Reasoning: a theoretical and computational perspective, pp. 55-84).
47. N.D. Rotstein, A.J. García, G.R. Simari, Reasoning from desires to intentions: a dialectical framework, in: 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Canada, 2007, pp. 136-141.
48. C.E. Briguez, M.C. Budán, C.A.D. Deagustini, A.G. Maguitman, M. Capobianco, G.R. Simari, Towards an argument-based music recommender system, in: Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012), 2012, pp. 83-90.
49. M. Wardeh, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, and F. Coenen Padua: a protocol for argumentation dialogue using association rules Artificial Intelligence Law 17 3 2009 183 215
50. M. Wardeh, F. Coenen, and T.J.M. Bench-Capon Pisa: a framework for multiagent classification using argumentation Data Knowledge Engineering 75 2012 34 57
51. S. Ontañón, E. Plaza, Multiagent inductive learning: an argumentation-based approach, in: 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2010), 2010, pp. 839-846.
52. S. Ontañón, P. Dellunde, L. Godo, and E. Plaza A defeasible reasoning model of inductive concept learning from examples and communication Artificial Intelligence 193 2012 129 148
53. N. Bassiliades, G. Antoniou, and I.P. Vlahavas A defeasible logic reasoner for the semantic web International Journal of Semantic Web Information System 2 1 2006 1 41
54. C. Chesñevar, J. McGinnis, S. Modgil, I. Rahwan, C. Reed, G. Simari, M. South, G. Vreeswijk, and S. Willmott Towards an argument interchange format Knowledge Engineering Review 21 4 2006 293 316
55. S. Brüninghaus, K.D. Ashley, Predicting outcomes of case-based legal arguments, in: Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2003), 2003, pp. 233-242.
56. V. Aleven, and K.D. Ashley Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples: empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment Artificial Intelligence in Education 39 1997 87 94
57. E.L. Rissland, K.D. Ashley, and L.K. Branting Case-based reasoning and law The Knowledge Engineering Review 20 2005 293 298
58. H. Prakken, A. Wyner, T. Bench-Capon, K. Atkinson, A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in aspic+, Journal of Logic and Computation (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.07.010.
59. A.Z. Wyner, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, K. Atkinson, Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases, in: Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL 2011), 2011, pp. 1-10.
60. A.Z. Wyner, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Argument schemes for legal case-based reasoning, in: 20th Anniversary International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2007), 2007, pp. 139-149.
61. N.I. Karacapilidis, and D. Papadias Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the hermes system Information Systems 26 4 2001 259 277
62. A. Muñoz, J.A. Botía, Asbo: Argumentation system based on ontologies, in: 12th International Workshop Cooperative Information Agents (CIA 2008), 2008, pp. 191-205.
63. S. Ontañón, E. Plaza, Arguments and counterexamples in case-based joint deliberation, in: Third International Workshop Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2006), 2006, pp. 36-53.
64. L.-K. Soh, and C. Tsatsoulis A real-time negotiation model and a multi-agent sensor network implementation Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11 3 2005 215 271
65. M.A. Falappa, G. Kern-Isberner, and G.R. Simari Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning Artificial Intelligence 141 1/2 2002 1 28
66. S. Gottifredi, A.J. García, G.R. Simari, Query-based argumentation in agent programming, in: 12th Ibero-American Conference on AI (IBERAMIA 2010), 2010, pp. 284-295.