ASBO: Argumentation system based on ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5180 LNAI, Issue , 2008, Pages 191-205

  Muñoz, Andrés ^a   Botía, Juan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Conflicts; Logic based systems; Ontological reasoning; Persuasion dialogue

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PROCESSING;

ARGUMENTATION; CONFLICTS; LOGIC BASED SYSTEMS; ONTOLOGICAL REASONING; PERSUASION DIALOGUE;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 57849117949     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85834-8_16     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Amgoud, L., Parsons, S.: Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 190-205, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)
3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American (2001)
4. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 93(1-2), 63-101 (1997)
5. Carbogim, D.V., Robertson, D., Lee, J.: Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering. Knowledge Engineering Review 15(2), 119-149 (2000)
6. Dean, M., Connoll, D., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: Web ontology language (OWL). Technical report, W3C (2004)
7. Doyle, J.: A truth maintenance system. Artificial Intelligence 12, 231-272 (1979)
8. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in non-monotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-357 (1995)
9. Dunlop, N., Indulska, J., Raymond, K.: Methods for conflict resolution in policy-based management systems. In: EDOC 2003: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, p. 98. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington (2003)
10. Fox, J., Krause, P., Ambler, S.: Arguments, contradictions and practical reasoning. In: ECAI 1992: Proceedings of the 10th European conference on Artificial intelligence, pp. 623-627. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1992)
11. García, A.J., Simari, G.R.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory Practice Logic Programmation 4(2), 95-138 (2004)
12. Horrocks, L, Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. Technical report, W3C (2004)
13. Lesser, V.: Cooperative multiagent systems: A personal view of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 11(1) (January 1999)
14. Munoz, A., Botia, J.A., Garcia, F.J., Martinez, G., Skarmeta, A.F.G.: Solving conflicts in agent-based ubiquitous computing systems: a proposal based on argumentation. In: Agent-Based Ubiquitous Computing (ABUC) Workshop, International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2007), Honolulu, Hawaii (May 2007)
15. Parsons, S., McBurney, P.: Argumentation-based communication between agents. In: Communication in Multiagent Systems, pp. 164-178 (2003)
16. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation 1998(3), 261-292 (1998)
17. Parsons, S.D., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation through argumentation-A preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1996), Kyoto, Japan, pp. 267-274 (1996)
18. Pollock, J.L.: Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for how to Build a Person. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
19. Pollock, J.L.: Rational cognition in OSCAR. In: ATAL 1999: 6th International Workshop on Intelligent Agents VI, Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL), pp. 71-90. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
20. Prakken, H.: From logic to dialectics in legal argument. In: ICAIL 1995: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, pp. 165-174. ACM Press, New York (1995)
21. Prakken, H.: Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. J. Log. and Comput. 15(6), 1009-1040 (2005)
22. Prakken, H.: Formal systems for persuasion dialogue. Knowledge Engineering Review 21(2), 163-188 (2006)
23. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3-4), 331-368 (1996)
24. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, D.: Logical Systems for Defeasible Argumentation. Handbook of Phil. Logic, vol. 4, pp. 219-318. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
25. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter.Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation among Computers. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
26. Shohama, Y., Tennenholtz, M.: On social laws for artificial agent societies: off-line design. Artificial Intelligence 73, 231-252 (1995)