Argument Schemes for Legal Case-based Reasoning

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 165, Issue , 2007, Pages 139-149

  Wyner, Adam ^a   Bench Capon, Trevor ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Case based reasoning; Legal reasoning; Precedent

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; CASEBASED REASONINGS (CBR); LEGAL CASE; LEGAL REASONING; PRECEDENT;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 85140260676     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Rissland, E.: The ubiquitous dialectic. In: ECAI 84, Pisa, Italy (1984) 663-668
2. Rissland, E.: Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument. In: ICAIL 1989, Vancouver, BC, Association For Computing Machinery (1989) 111-120
3. Ashley, K.: Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Bradford Books/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1990)
4. Aleven, V.: Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh (1997)
5. Brüninghaus, S., Ashley, K.D.: Generating legal arguments and predictions from case texts. In: ICAIL 2005, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005) 65-74
6. Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B.: Cabaret: rule interpretation in a hybrid architecture. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 34(6) (1991) 839-887
7. Rissland, E.L., Skalak, D.B., Friedman, M.T.: Bankxx: Supporting legal arguments through heuristic retrieval. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(1) (1996) 1-71
8. Prakken, H., Sartor, G.: A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4(3-4) (1996) 331-368
9. Bench-Capon, T.: Arguing with cases. In Oskamp, A., et al., eds.: JURIX 1997, Nijmegen, Gerard Noodt Instituut (1997) 85-100
10. Bench-Capon, T., Sartor, G.: A model of legal reasoning with cases incorporating theories and values. Artif. Intell. 150(1-2) (2003) 97-143
11. Chorley, A.: Reasoning with Legal Cases seen as Theory Construction. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool, Department of Computer Science, Liverpool, UK (2007)
12. Gordon, T., Prakken, H., Walton, D.: The carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence 171 (2007) 875-896
13. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah, N.J. (1996)
14. Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Towards an account of persuasion in law. In: ICAIL 2003, New York, ACM Press (2003)
15. Hafner, C., Berman, D.: The role of context in case-based legal reasoning: teleological, temporal and procedural. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (2002) 19-64
16. Hage, J.: Goal-based theory evaluation. In Breuker, J., et al., eds.: JURIX 2000, Amsterdam, IOS Press (2000) 59-72