What is Librarian 2.0 - New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint

Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 198-205

  Huvila, Isto ^a   Holmberg, Kim ^a   Kronqvist Berg, Maria ^a   Nivakoski, Outi ^a   Widén, Gunilla ^a  

^a ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

co word analysis; Competence; librarian; Librarian 2.0; profession

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883047332     PISSN: 09610006     EISSN: 17416477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0961000613477122     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbott AThe system of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1988:.
2. Abbott A.Professionalism and the future of librarianship.Library Trends. 1998;46 (3): 430-443.
3. Abram S.Social libraries. The Librarian 2.0 phenomenon.Library Resources and Technical Services. 2008;52 (2): 19-22.
4. Aharony N.Web 2.0 use by librarians.Library & Information Science Research. 2009;31 (1): 29-37.
5. Ashcroft L.Developing competencies, critical analysis and personal transferable skills in future information professionals.Library Review. 2004;53 (2): 82-88.
6. Baruchson-Arbib S,Bronstein J.A view to the future of the library and information science profession: A Delphi study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2002;53 (5): 397-408.
7. Bennett S,Maton K,Kervin L.The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence.British Journal of Educational Technology. 2008;39 (5): 775-786.
8. Boyack KW,Klavans R,Börner K.Mapping the backbone of science.Scientometrics. 2005;64 (3): 351-374.
9. Broady-Preston J.Professional education, development and training in a Web 2.0 environment: A case study of the UK.New Library World. 2009;110 (5/6): 265-279.
10. Brophy PThe Library in the Twenty-First Century. 2007) The Library in the Twenty-First Century. 2nd edn.London: Facet.London: Facet; 2007:.
11. Cassner M,Adams KE.Assessing the professional development needs of distance librarians and academic libraries.Journal of Library Administration. 2006;45 (1): 81-99.
12. Chan DC,Auster E.Factors contributing to the professional development of reference librarians.Library & Information Science Research. 2003;25 (3): 265-286.
13. Chawner B.Spectators, not players: Information managers' use of Web 2.0 in New Zealand.Electronic Library. 2008;26 (5): 630-649.
14. Courtial JP.A co-word analysis of scientometrics.Scientometrics. 1994;31 (3): 251-260.
15. Cullen J.Professionalizing knowledge sharing and communications.Business Information Review. 2008a;25 (1): 53-57.
16. Cullen J.Catalyzing innovation and knowledge sharing: Librarian 2.0.Business Information Review. 2008b;25 (4): 253-258.
17. Drejer AStrategic Management and Core Competencies: Theory and Application. Westport, CN: Quorum Books; 2002:.
18. Foss NJ,Knudsen CTowards a Competence Theory of the Firm. London and New York: Routledge; 1996:.
19. Fourie I.Librarians and the claiming of new roles: How can we try to make a difference?.Aslib Proceedings. 2004;56 (1): 62-74.
20. Hager P,Beckett D.Philosophical underpinnings of the integrated conception of competence.Educational Philosophy and Theory. 1995;27 (1): 1-24.
21. He Q.Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis.Library Trends. 1999;48 (1): 133-159.
22. Hjørland B.Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis.Information Processing and Management. 2000;36 (3): 501-531.
23. Holmberg K,Huvila I,Kronqvist-Berg M, et al.What is Library 2.0?.Journal of Documentation. 2009;65 (4): 668-681.
24. Joint N.Digital libraries and the future of the library profession.Library Review. 2006;56 (1): 12-23.
25. Kealy K.Do library staff have what it takes to be a librarian of the future?.Library Management. 2009;30 (8/9): 572-582.
26. Kosmala K,Herrbach O.The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms.Human Relations. 2006;59 (10): 1393-1428.
27. Martell CEncyclopedia of Library and Information Science. Drake MA, ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2003:2524-2536.
28. Meschi P-X,Cremer EAdvances in Applied Business Strategy. Sanchez RHeene A, ed. Bingley: Emerald; 2005:305-325.
29. Olander BFramgångspotential: Egenskapsfaktorer vid rekryteringen av bibliotekarier. Lund: BIVIL; 2009:.
30. Olander B,Berry PBiblioteket som serviceföretag: Kunden i centrum. Blomberg BWidbäck G, ed. Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden; 1992:103-119.
31. Olsson LDet datoriserade biblioteket: Maskindrömmar på 70-talet. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet; 1995:.
32. Partridge H,Lee J,Munro C.Becoming 'Librarian 2.0': The skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a Web 2.0 world (and beyond).Library Trends. 2010a;59 (1/2): 315-335.
33. Partridge H,Menzies V,Lee J, et al.The contemporary librarian: Skills, knowledge and attributes required in a world of emerging technologies.Library and Information Science Research. 2010b;32 (4): 265-271.
34. Pedersen KN.Librarianship: From collections control to tools understanding.New Library World. 2006;107 (11/12): 538-551.
35. Peltier-Davis C.Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Library user 2.0, Librarian 2.0: innovative services for sustainable libraries.Computers in Libraries. 2009;29 (10): 16-21.
36. Radford GP.Positivism, Foucault, and the fantasia of the library: Conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience.Library Quarterly. 1992;62 (4): 408-424.
37. Radford GP,Radford ML.Libraries, librarians, and the discourse of fear.Library Quarterly. 2001;71 (3): 299-329.
38. Rutherford LL.Implementing social software in public libraries. An exploration of the issues confronting public library adopters of social software.Library Hi Tech. 2008;26 (2): 184-200.
39. Sandberg J,Pinnington AH.Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective.Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46 (7): 1138-1170.
40. Santema S,van de and Rijt JAdvances in Applied Business Strategy. Sanchez RHeene A, ed. Bingley: Emerald; 2005:17-28.
41. Sevón KBibliotekarierollen i en ny utbildningsorganization. En studie av fyra yrkeshögskolor. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag; 2007:.
42. StephensM (2007) Modeling the Role of Blogging in Librarianship. Texas: University of North Texas. Available at: http://tametheweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/stephens-mfinal.pdf (accessed 2 August 2010).
43. Stover M.The reference librarian as non-expert: A postmodern approach to expertise.Reference Librarian. 2004;42 (87): 273-300.
44. Sundin O,Hedman JTheories of Information Behavior. Fisher KE, ed. Medford, NJ: Information Today; 2005:293-297.
45. Torstensson M.Libraries and society: The macrostructural aspect of library and information studies.Library Review. 2002;51 (3/4): 211-220.
46. Tuominen K.User centered discourse: An analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian.Library Quarterly. 1997;67 (4): 350-371.
47. Wenger ECommunities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999:.