Future trends in environmental mercury concentrations: Implications for prevention strategies

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Sunderland, Elsie M ^a   Selin, Noelle E ^b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Costs; Emissions; Exposures; Fish; Health; Methylmercury; Risk; Wildlife

Indexed keywords

MERCURY; SEA WATER; METHYLMERCURY DERIVATIVE;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECONOMIC IMPACT; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EMISSION CONTROL; FOOD CONSUMPTION; FUTURE PROSPECT; MERCURY (ELEMENT); METHYLMERCURY; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; POLLUTION POLICY; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEAFOOD; TREND ANALYSIS;

ATMOSPHERE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MARINE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; PREVENTION STUDY; REVIEW; SEA FOOD; TREND STUDY; WATER CONTAMINATION; WILDLIFE; CHEMISTRY; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; HAIR; NOTE; POLLUTANT; PREGNANCY; TOXICITY AND INTOXICATION;

PACIFIC OCEAN; PACIFIC OCEAN (NORTH);

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FEMALE; HAIR; HUMANS; METHYLMERCURY COMPOUNDS; NEUROTOXICITY SYNDROMES; PREGNANCY;

EID: 84883018924     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1476069X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-2     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Bellanger M, Pichery C, Aerts D, Berglund M, Castano A, Cejchanova M, Crettaz P, Davidson F, Esteban M, Exley K, et al: Economic benefits of methylmercury exposure control in Europe: Monetary value of neurotoxicity prevention. Environ Health 2013, in press.
2. Sunderland E, Corbitt ED, Cossa D, Evers D, Friedli HR, Krabbenhoft D, Levin L, Pirrone N, Rice G: Chapter 5: Impacts of Intercontinental Mercury Transport on Human and Ecological Health. In Hemispheric Tranport of Air Pollution, Part B, Mercury. Air Pollution Studies No. 18. Edited by Pirrone N, Keating T. Geneva: United Nations; 2010:145-179. ECE/EB. AIR/101.
3. Sunderland EM: Mercury exposure from domestic and imported estuarine and marine fish in the U. S. seafood market. Environ Health Perspect 2007, 115:235-242.
4. Valera B, Dewailly E, Poirier P: Association between methylmercury and cardiovascular risk factors in a native population of Quebec (Canada): A retrospective evaluation. Environ Res 2012, in press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2012.08.002.
5. Weihe P, Hansen JC, Murata K, Debes F, Jorgensen PJ, Steuerwald U, White RF, Grandjean P: Neurobehavioral performance of Inuit children with increased pre-natal exposure to methylmercury. Int J Circumpolar Health 2002, 61:41-49.
6. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K, Sorensen N, Dahl R, Jorgensen PJ: Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1997, 19:417-428.
7. Kraepiel A, Keller K, Chin H, Malcolm E, Morel F: Sources and variations of mercury in tuna. Environ Sci Technol 2003, 37:5551-5558.
8. Amos HM, Jacob DJ, Streets DG, Sunderland EM: Legacy impacts of alltime anthropogenic emissions on the global mercury cycle. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2013, in review.
9. Streets DG, Devane MK, Lu Z, Bond TC, Sunderland EM, Jacob DJ: All-time releases of mercury to the atmosphere from human activities. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:10485-10491.
10. Harris R, Rudd J, Amyot M, Babiarz C, Beaty K, Blanchfield P, Bodaly R, Branfireun B, Gilmour C, Graydon J, et al: Whole ecosystem study shows rapid fish-mercury response to changes in mercury deposition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:16586-16591.
11. Knightes C, Sunderland E, Barber M, Johnston J, Ambrose RJ: Application of ecosystem scale fate and bioaccumulation models to predict fish mercury response times to changes in atmospheric deposition. Environ Toxicol Chem 2009, 28:881-893.
12. Mason RP, Choi AL, Fitzgerald WF, Hammerschmidt CR, Lamborg CH, Soerensen AL, Sunderland EM: Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ Res 2012, 119:101-117.
13. Cossa D, Averty B, Pirrone N: The origin of methylmercury in open Mediterranean waters. Limnol Oceanogr 2009, 54:837-844.
14. Cossa D, Heimburger L-E, Lannuzel D, Rintoul SR, Butler E C V, Bowie AR, Averty B, Watson RJ, Remenyi T: Mercury in the Southern Ocean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 2011, 75:4037-4052.
15. Kirk JL, St Louis V, Hintelmann H, Lehnherr I, Else B, Poissant L: Methylated mercury species in marine waters of the Canadian High and Sub Arctic. Environ Sci Technol 2008, 42:8367-8373.
16. Mason RP, Fitzgerald W: Alkylmercury species in the equatorial Pacific. Nature 1990, 347:457-459.
17. Sunderland EM, Krabbenhoft DP, Moreau JW, Strode SA, Landing WM: Mercury sources, distribution, and bioavailability in the North Pacific Ocean: Insights from data and models. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2009, 23: GB2010.
18. Lehnerr I, St Louis VL, Hintelmann H, Kirk JL: Methylation of inorganic mercury in polar marine waters. Nat Geosci 2011, 4:298-302.
19. Wang F, Macdonald R, Armstrong D, Stern G: Total and methylated mercury in the Beaufort Sea: The role of local and recent organic matter remineralization. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46:11821-11828.
20. Depew DC, Basu N, Burgess N, Campbell LM, Devlin EW, Drevnick PE, Hammerschmidt CR, Murphy CA, Sandheinrich MB, Weiner J: Toxicity of dietary methylmercury to fish: Derivation of ecologically meaningful threshold concentrations. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012, 31:1-12.
21. Dietz R, Sonne C, Basu N, Braune B, O'Hara T, Letcher RJ, Scheuhammer T, Andersen M P S, Andreasen C, Andriashek D, et al: What are the toxicological effects of mercury in Arctic biota? Sci Total Environ 2013, 443:775-790.
22. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, Taylor KM, Siegel LS, Cooley JH, Bank MS, Major A, et al: Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:69-81.
23. Jackson AK, Evers DC, Etterson MA, Condon AM, Folsom SB, Detweiler J, Schmerfeld J, Cristol JA: Mercury exposure affects the reproductive success of a free-living terrestrial songbird, the carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus). Auk 2011, 128:759-769.
24. Vo A T E, Bank MS, Shine JP, Edwards SV: Temporal increase in organic mercury in an endangered pelagic seabird assessed by century-old museum specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:7466-7471.
25. Dietz R, Outridge PM, Hobson KA: Anthropogenic contributions to mercury levels in present-day Arctic animals-A review. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407:6120-6131.
26. Evers DC, Turnquist MA, Buck DG: Patterns of global seafood mercury concentrations and their relationship with human health, version 3, Biodiversity Research Institute. Gorham, Maine: Science Communications Series; 2012:12. 45. Note the publisher is Biodiversity Research Institute. The report is available here: http://www.zeromercury.org/index.php? option=com-phocadownload&view=file&id=172:bri-report-mercury-in-theglobalenvironment-patterns-of-global-seafood-mercury-concentrations-andtheirrelationship-with-human-health&Itemid=70.
27. Pacyna E, Pacyna J, Sundseth K, Munthe J, Kindbom K, Wilson S, Steenhuisen F, Maxson P: Global emission of mercury to the atmosphere from anthropogenic sources in 2005 and projections to 2020. Atmos Environ 2010, 44:2487-2499.
28. Sippl K, Selin H: Global policy for local livelihoods: Phasing out mercury in artisanal and small-scale gold mining. Environment 2012, 54:18-29.
29. Selin N, Jacob D: Seasonal and spatial patterns of mercury wet deposition in the United States: Constraints on the contribution from North American anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ 2008, 42:5193-5204.
30. Selin NE: Science and strategies to reduce mercury risks: a critical review. J Environ Monit 2011, 13:2389-2399.
31. Selin NE: Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: A review. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2009, 34:43-63.
32. Selin NE, Sunderland EM, Knightes CD, Mason RP: Sources of Mercury Exposure for US Seafood Consumers: Implications for Policy. Environ Health Perspect 2010, 118:137-143.
33. Selin N, Jacob D, Yantosca R, Strode S, Jaegle L, Sunderland E: Global 3-D land-ocean-atmosphere model for mercury: Present-day versus preindustrial cycles and anthropogenic enrichment factors for deposition. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2008, 22: GB2011.
34. Sunderland EM, Mason R: Human impacts on open ocean mercury concentrations. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2007, 21: GB4022.
35. Streets DG, Zhang Q: Projections of global mercury emissions in 2050. Environ Sci Technol 2009, 43:2983-2988.
36. Pirrone N, Keating T: Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution, Part B: Mercury. In Air Pollution Studies No. 18. Geneva: Unted Nations; 2010. ECE/EB. AIR/101.
37. U. S. EPA: Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standard. NC: U. S. EPA, OAQPS, Research Triangle Park; 2011:510. EPA-452/R-11-011.
38. Selin N, Selin H: Global politics of mercury pollution: The need for a multi-scale approach. Rev Eur Community Int Environ Law 2006, 15:258-269.
39. Mahaffey KR, Sunderland E, Chan HM, Choi AL, Grandjean P, Marien K, Oken E, Sakamoto M, Schoeny R, Weihe P, et al: Balancing the benefits of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risks of methylmercury exposure from fish consumption. Nutr Rev 2011, 69:493-508.