Subjective visibility depends on level of processing

Cognition

Volumn 129, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 404-409

  Windey, Bert ^a   Gevers, Wim ^a   Cleeremans, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Awareness; Consciousness; Dichotomous; Graded; Psychophysics; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISIBILITY; VISION; VISUAL PROCESSING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

AWARENESS; CONSCIOUSNESS; DICHOTOMOUS; GRADED; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION;

AWARENESS; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883014507     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boehler C., Schoenfeld M., Heinze H., Hopf J. Rapid recurrent processing gates awareness in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(25):8742.
2. Christensen M., Ramsøy T., Lund T., Madsen K., Rowe J. An fMRI study of the neural correlates of graded visual perception. NeuroImage 2006, 31(4):1711-1725.
3. Crick F., Koch C. A framework for consciousness. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6(2):119-126.
4. Dehaene S., Changeux J., Naccache L., Sackur J., Sergent C. Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: A testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(5):204-211.
5. Dehaene S., Kerszberg M., Changeux J. A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998, 929(1):152-165.
6. Dehaene S., Sergent C., Changeux J. A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003, 100(14):8520.
7. Del Cul A., Baillet S., Dehaene S. Brain dynamics underlying the nonlinear threshold for access to consciousness. PLoS Biology 2007, 5(10):e260.
8. Del Cul A., Dehaene S., Leboyer M. Preserved subliminal processing and impaired conscious access in schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 2006, 63:1313-1323.
9. Del Cul A., Dehaene S., Reyes P., Bravo E., Slachevsky A. Causal role of prefrontal cortex in the threshold for access to consciousness. Brain 2009, 132(9):2531-2540. 10.1093/brain/awp111.
10. Fahrenfort J.J., Scholte H.S., Lamme V.A.F. The spatiotemporal profile of cortical processing leading up to visual perception. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(1). 12-12. 10.1167/8.1.12.
11. Fei-Fei L., Iyer A., Koch C., Perona P. What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene?. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(1). 10-10. 10.1167/7.1.10.
12. Gaillard R., Dehaene S., Adam C., Clémenceau S., Hasboun D., Baulac M., et al. Converging Intracranial Markers of Conscious Access. PLoS Biology 2009, 7(3):e61. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000061.sv004.
13. Hochstein S., Ahissar M. View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 2002, 36(5):791-804.
14. Koivisto M., Silvanto J. Relationship between visual binding, reentry and awareness. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:1293-1303.
15. Koivisto M., Silvanto J. Visual feature binding: The critical time windows of V1/V2 and parietal activity. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1608-1614.
16. Lamme V.A.F. Zap! Magnetic tricks on conscious and unconscious vision. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(5):193-195.
17. Lamme V. How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness. Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 1(3):204-240.
18. Lockhart R., Craik F. Levels of processing: A retrospective commentary on a framework for memory research. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1990, 44(1):87-112.
19. Overgaard M., Feldbæk Nielsen J., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A. A TMS study of the ventral projections from V1 with implications for the finding of neural correlates of consciousness. Brain and Cognition 2004, 54(1):58-64.
20. Overgaard M., Rote J., Mouridsen K., Ramsøy T. Is conscious perception gradual or dichotomous? A comparison of report methodologies during a visual task. Consciousness and Cognition 2006, 15(4):700-708.
21. Sandberg K., Bibby B.M., Timmermans B., Cleeremans A., Overgaard M. Measuring consciousness: Task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20(4):1659-1675. 10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.002.
22. Sandberg K., Timmermans B., Overgaard M., Cleeremans A. Measuring consciousness: Is one measure better than the other?. Consciousness and Cognition 2010, 19(4):1069-1078.
23. Sergent C., Dehaene S. Is consciousness a gradual phenomenon?. Psychological Science 2004, 15(11):720.