Study protocol-an exploratory trial on health promoting schools at dutch secondary schools

International Journal of Integrated Care

Volumn 12, Issue JULY-SEPTEMBER 20, 2012, Pages

  Busch, Vincent ^a   De Leeuw, Johannes Rob Josephus ^a   Schrijvers, Augustinus Jacobus Petrus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Health education; Protocol; Youth health

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883003106     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15684156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. de Vries H, van 't Riet J, Spigt M, Metsemakers J, van den Akker M, Vermunt JK, et al. Clusters of lifestyle behaviors: results from the Dutch SMILE study. Preventive Medicine 2008;46(3):203-8.
2. Weinstein A, Lejoyeux M. Internet addiction or excessive internet use. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2010;36(5):277-83.
3. Kulbok PA, Cox CL. Dimensions of adolescent health behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health 2002 Nov 1;31(5):394-400.
4. Kemper HCG, Snel J, Verschuur R, Essen LS-V. Tracking of health and risk indicators of cardiovascular diseases from teenager to adult: Amsterdam growth and health study. Preventive Medicine 1990 Nov;19(6):642-55.
5. De Bruijn G, Van Den Putte B. Adolescent soft drink consumption, television viewing and habit strength. Investigating clustering effects in the theory of planned behaviour. Apetite 2009;53(1):66-75.
6. Peters LWH, Kok G, Ten Dam GTM, Buijs GJ, Paulussen TGWM. Effective elements of school health promotion across behavioral domains: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health 2009;9(182).
7. Peters LWH, Wiefferink CH, Hoekstra F, Buijs GJ, ten Dam GTM, Paulussen TGWM. A review of similarities between domainspecific determinants of four health behaviors among adolescents. Health Education Research 2009;24(2):198-223.
8. Wiefferink C, Peters L, Hoekstra F, Dam G, Buijs G, Paulussen T. Clustering of health-related behaviors and their determinants: possible consequences for school health interventions. Prevention Science 2006;7(2):127-49.
9. Werch C, Moore M, DiClemente C, Bledsoe R, Jobli E. A multihealth behavior intervention integrating physical activity and substance use prevention for adolescents. Prevention Science 2005 Sep 1;6(3):213-26.
10. Prochaska JO. Multiple health behavior research represents the future of preventive medicine. Preventive Medicine 2008;46(3):281-5.
11. de Leeuw JRJ, de Bruijn M, de Weert-van Oene GH, Schrijvers AJP. Internet and game behaviour at a secondary school and a newly developed health promotion programme: a prospective study. BMC Public Health 2010;10(544).
12. Patton GC, Bond L, Carlin JB, Thomas L, Butler H, Glover S, et al. Promoting social inclusion in schools: a group-randomized trial of effects on student health risk behavior and well-being. American Journal of Public Health 2006 Sep 1;96(9): 1582-7.
13. Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF. A randomized controlled trial of single versus multiple health behavior change: promoting physical activity and nutrition among adolescents. Health Psychology 2004;23(3):314-8.
14. Eisenmann J, Gentile D, Welk G, Callahan R, Strickland S, Walsh M, et al. SWITCH: rationale, design, and implementation of a community, school, and family-based intervention to modify behaviors related to childhood obesity. BMC Public Health 2008;8(1).
15. Mukoma W, Flisher AJ. Evaluations of health promoting schools: a review of nine studies. Health Promotion International 2004 Sep 1;19(3):357-68.
16. Prochaska J, Spring B, Nigg C. Multiple health behavior change research: an introduction and overview. Preventive Medicine 2008;46(3):181-8.
17. Prochaska JJ, Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Delucchi K, Hall SM. Comparing intervention outcomes in smokers treated for single versus multiple behavioral risks. Health Psychology 2006;25(3):380-8.
18. Prochaska JJ, Velicer WF, Nigg CR, Prochaska JO. Methods of quantifying change in multiple risk factor interventions. Preventive Medicine 2008;46(3):260-5.
19. Prochaska JJ, Prochaska JO. A review of multiple health behavior change interventions for primary prevention. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2011 May;5(3):208-21.
20. Morabia A, Costanza MC. Multiple health behavior change research: en avant, March! Preventive Medicine 2008;46(3):179-80.
21. Morabia A, Costanza MC. Multiple health behavior change interventions: tell us what you see. Preventive Medicine 2010;50(1-2):1-2.
22. Flay BR. Positive youth development requires comprehensive health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Behavior 2002;26(6):407-24.
23. Flay B. Approaches to substance use prevention utilizing school curriculum plus social environmental change. Addictive Behaviors 2000;25(6):861-85.
24. Flay BR, Graumlich S, Segawa E, Burns JL, Holliday MY. Effects of 2 prevention programs on high-risk behaviors among African American youth: a randomized trial. Archives of Paediatric Adolescent Medicine 2004;158(4):377-84.
25. St Leger LH. The opportunities and effectiveness of the health promoting primary school in improving child health: a review of the claims and evidence. Health Education Research 1999 Feb 1;14(1):51-69.
26. Bamekow Rasmussen V. The European Network of Health Promoting schools-from to Kyrgyzstan. Promotion and Education 2005 Sep;12(3-4):169-72.
27. Cheshlarov M, Havlinova M, Inchley J, Jakonen S, Jankulovska S, Bruun Jensen B, et al. Models of health promoting schools in Europe. European Commission, World Health Organization Europe, Council of Europe; 2002.
28. Bamekow Rasmussen V, Rivett D. The European Network of Health Promoting Schools: an alliance of health, education and democracy. Health Education 2000;100(2):61-7.
29. World Health Organization. Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: WHO; 1986.
30. Simovska V. The changing meanings of participation in school-based health education and health promotion: the participants' voices. Health Education Research 2007 Dec 1;22(6):864-78.
31. Yen JY, Ko CH, Yen CF, Chen SH, Chung WL, Chen CC. Psychiatric symptoms in adolescents with Internet addiction: comparison with substance use. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences 2008;62(1):9-16.
32. Sterkenburg NM, de Weert-van Oene GH, de Leeuw JRJ. The relationship between bullying, psychosocial health and happiness of secondary school students (in Dutch). Dutch Journal of Health Sciences (Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidswetenschappen) 2012;90:44-9.
33. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal 2000;321(7262).
34. Campbell NC, Murray E, Darbyshire J, Emery J, Farmer A, Griffiths F, et al. Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care. BMJ 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9.
35. Parsons C, Stears D. Evaluating health-promoting schools: steps to success. Health Education 2002;102(1):7-15.
36. Flay BR. Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine 1986;15(5):451-74.
37. World Health Organization. Health behaviour in school-aged children: a WHO cross-national survey (HBSC) Research protocol for the 1997-98 study. Edinburgh: World Health Organization; 1998.
38. van Dorsselaer S, de Looze M, Vermeulen-Smit E, de Roos SVJ, ter Bogt T, Vollebergh W. Health, well-being and education of Dutch adolescents, HBSC 2009. The Netherlands: Trimbos Instituut, Universiteit Utrecht, Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau; 2010.
39. Goodman R, Meltzer H, Bailey V. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a pilot study on the validity of the self-report version. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 1998 Oct 24;7(3):125-30.
40. Van Rooij AJ. Online video game addiction. Exploring a new phenomenon. Rotterdam. The Netherlands: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam; 2011.
41. Boyce W, Torsheim T, Currie C, Zambon A. The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research 2006 Sep 1;78(3):473-87.
42. Goodman R. The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1997;38(5):581-6.
43. de Nooijer J, de Vries NK. Monitoring health risk behavior of Dutch adolescents and the development of health promoting policies and activities: the E-MOVO project. Health Promotion International 2007 Mar 1;22(1):5-10.
44. Jones ML. Using software to analyse qualitative data. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research 2007;1(1):64-76.
45. Meerkerk GJ, Van Den Eijnden RJJM, Vermulst AA, Garretsen HFL. The compulsive internet use scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2009;12(1):1-6.
46. Adamchak S, Bond K, MacLaren L, Magnani R, Nelson K, Seltzer J. A guide to monitoring and evaluating adolescent reproductive health programs. Washington, DC, USA: Focus on Young Adults; 2000.
47. Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosomatic Medicine 2004 May 1;66(3):411-21.
48. Patton G, Bond L, Butler H, Glover S. Changing schools, changing health? Design and implementation of the Gatehouse Project. The Journal of Adolescent Health 2003 Oct 1;33(4):231-9.
49. Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 2005 Jul 15;10(s1):21-34.
50. Gugglberger L, Dür W. Capacity building in and for health promoting schools: results from a qualitative study. Health Policy 2011 Jun;101(1):37-43.