Evaluating China's regional collaboration innovation capability from the innovation actors perspective-An AHP and cluster analytical approach

Technology in Society

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 182-190

  Zhao, Shu Liang ^a   Song, Wei ^a   Zhu, Dong Yun ^a   Peng, Xiao Bao ^a   Cai, Wenjing ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

AHP; Cluster analysis; Innovation actor; Regional collaboration innovation capability

Indexed keywords

AHP; CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT; ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT; IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURES; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; REGIONAL COLLABORATION; REGIONAL INNOVATION; REGIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; RESEARCH;

REGIONAL PLANNING;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; INNOVATION; REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT;

CHINA;

EID: 84882837490     PISSN: 0160791X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Altuzarra A. Public funding for innovation at different levels of government: an analysis of Spanish manufacturing. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 2010, 20.
2. Álvarez I., Marín R. Entry modes and national systems of innovation. Journal of International Management 2010, 16(4):340-353. 10.1016/j.intman.2010.09.005.
3. Archibugi D., Coco A. A new indicator of technological capabilities for developed and developing countries. World Development 2004, 32(4):629-654.
4. Archibugi D.C., Alberto Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: a survey and a menu for choice. Research Policy 2005, 34(2):175-194.
5. Arvanitis S. How do different motives for R&D cooperation affect firm performance? An analysis based on Swiss micro data. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2012, 22(5):981-1007. 10.1007/s00191-012-0273-5.
6. Baizhou L. China's large enterprises' evaluation of the original innovation ability based on AHP. Science and Technology Progress and Policy 2010, 27(1):125-129.
7. Barge-Gil A. Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators: an empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior. Technovation 2010, 30(3):195-206. 10.1016/j.technovation.2009.11.004.
8. Boothby D., Dufour A., Tang J. Technology adoption, training and productivity performance. Research Policy 2010, 39(5):650-661. 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.011.
9. Cantner U., Meder A., ter Wal A.L.J. Innovator networks and regional knowledge base. Technovation 2010, 30(9-10):496-507. 10.1016/j.technovation.2010.04.002.
10. Wagner Caroline S, Brian Jackson IB, Anny Wong, Tatsuro Yoda. Science and technology collaboration: building capacity in developing countries?; 2001a.
11. Wagner Caroline S., Brian Jackson I.B., Wong Anny, Yoda Tatsuro Science and technology collaboration: building capacity in developing countries? 2001, RAND, Arlington, VA.
12. Charles D. Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 2006, 19(1):117-130. 10.1080/13511610600608013.
13. Chen Yuchuan Z.X. Structural analysis on technology innovation system in Jiangsu Province. Technology Economics 2008, 27(12):55-60.
14. Chi W., Qian X. The role of education in regional innovation activities: spatial evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 2010, 15(4):396-419. 10.1080/13547860.2010.516158.
15. Chung S. Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems. Technovation 2002, 22:485-491.
16. Cooke Regional innovation systems: competitive regulations in the new Europe. Geoforum 1992, 23(3):365-382.
17. Hull C.E., Covin J.G. Learning capability, technological parity, and innovation mode use. Product Development & Management Association 2010, 27:97-114.
18. Dong X., Tang M. The role of universities in enhancing regional competitiveness of Jilin Province. Asian Social Science 2011, 7(10). 10.5539/ass.v7n10p177.
19. Dun L. Evaluation model of scientific diathesis based on AHP and clustering analysis and its empirical study. Science and Technology Progress and Policy 2007, 24(11):66-69.
20. Hagedoorn J., Cloodt M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?. Research Policy 2003, 32(8):1365-1379. 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00137-3.
21. Henry Etzkowitz L.L. Etzkowitz-2000 - the dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 2000, 29:109-123.
22. Herrmann A.M., Taks J.L., Moors E. Beyond regional clusters: on the importance of geographical proximity for R&D collaborations in a global economy - the case of the Flemish biotech sector. Industry and Innovation 2012, 19(6):499-516. 10.1080/13662716.2012.718876.
23. Hoekman J., Frenken K., Tijssen R.J.W. Research collaboration at a distance: changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy 2010, 39(5):662-673. 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.012.
24. IMD World competitiveness yearbook 2012 2012, International Institute for Management Development, Lausanne.
25. Inzelt A. The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition. Research Policy 2004, 33(6, 7):975-995.
26. Isaksen A., Karlsen J. Different modes of innovation and the challenge of connecting universities and industry: case studies of two regional industries in Norway. European Planning Studies 2010, 18(12):1993-2008. 10.1080/09654313.2010.516523.
27. Furman Jeffrey L., Scott Stern M.E.P. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 2002, 31(6):899-933.
28. Johnson W.H.A. Managing university technology development using organizational control theory. Research Policy 2011, 40(6):842-852. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.001.
29. Kunc S.T.A.M. Measuring the roles universities play in regional innovation systems a comparative study between Chilean and Canadian natural resource based regions. Science and Public Policy 2011, 38(1):55-66.
30. López Rodríguez J., García Rodríguez R.M. Technology and export behaviour: a resource-based view approach. International Business Review 2005, 14(5):539-557. 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.002.
31. Lenger A. Regional innovation systems and the role of state: institutional design and state universities in Turkey. European Planning Studies 2008, 16(8):1101-1120. 10.1080/09654310802315781.
32. Li J., Kozhikode R.K. Developing new innovation models: shifts in the innovation landscapes in emerging economies and implications for global R&D management. Journal of International Management 2009, 15(3):328-339. 10.1016/j.intman.2008.12.005.
33. Maskus K.M. Intellectual property rights in the global economy 2000, Institute for International Economics, Salem, MA.
34. Porter Michael E., Schwab Klaus The global competitiveness report 2008-2009 2008, WEF, Geneva, Switzerland.
35. UNIDO Industrial development report 2005 2005, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna.
36. Weiming Z. Evaluation on innovation capability of the science andtechnology innovationteam in universities and colleges based on AHP. Science and Technology Progress and Policy 2009, 26(19):187-190.
37. Wennberg K., Wiklund J., Wright M. The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy 2011, 40(8):1128-1143. 10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.014.
38. Wonglimpiyarat J. Innovation index and the innovative capacity of nations. Futures 2010, 42(3):247-253. 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.010.
39. Xiai Z. Research on the evaluation indicators system of scientific research team performance in university-based on AHP. Science and Technology and Management Research 2009, 2:225-227.
40. Zeng Xiao-Bin B.Y.-Q. On the subject and capability of regional innovation. International Economics and Trade Research 2008, 24(6):12-16.
41. Acsa Zoltan J., Attila Varga L.A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 2002, 31:1069-1085.