The evolution of university-industry-government relationships during transition

Research Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 6-7, 2004, Pages 975-995

  Inzelt, Annamária ^a  

^a BUESPA   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Innovation; Transition economy; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; PRIVATIZATION; PUBLIC POLICY; STATISTICS; SURVEYING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

COLLABORATION; INNOVATION; TRANSITION ECONOMY; TRIPLE-HELIX;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 3242892760     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Archibugi, D., Lundvall, B., 2001. The Globalising Learning Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
2. Audretsch D., Stephan P. Company-scientist locational links: the case of biotechnology. American Economic Review. 86(3):1996;641-652.
3. Balogh, T., 2002. Hol állunk Európában? (A magyarországi és az európai kutatás- fejlesztés helyzete) (The current position of Hungarian and European R&D), Magyar Tudomány No. 3.
4. Bryant, K., Wells, A. (Eds.), 1998. A New Economic Paradigm? Innovation-based Evolutionary Systems, Competitive Australia, Canberra, Australia.
5. Conceição, P., Heitor, M., 2001. Universities in the learning economy: balancing institutional integrity with organisational diversity. In: Archibugi, D., Lundvall, B. (Eds.), The Globalising Learning Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 83-96.
6. Conceição, P., Heitor, M., 2002. Systems of innovation and competence building across diversity: Learning from the Portuguese path in the European context, mimeo.
7. Cohen, W., Florida, R., Goa, R., 1994. University Industry Research Centers in the United States, Carnegie Mellon University, Mimeo July.
8. CSO, 2001. A feldolgozóipar innovációs tevékenysége (Innovative activity of the manufacturing industry), Budapest, Hungary.
9. Crow, M., Gelijns, M., Nelson, R.R., Bhaven, N.S., 1998. Recent changes in university - Industry research interactions, preliminary analysis of causes and effects, Columbia University, New York.
10. David, P., Foray, D., 1994. Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. A conceptual framework for comparing national profiles in systems of learning and innovation. OECD, DSTI/STP/TIP (94), p. 4.
11. Dévai, K., Kerékgyártó, Gy., Papanek, G., Borsi, B., 2000. Az egyetemi K+F szerepe az innovációs folyamatokban. A Budapesti Mûszaki és Gazdasági Egyetem (Role of University R&D in the Innovation Process, the Example of Budapest University of Technology and Economics), OM, Budapest.
12. EBRD, 1999. Transition Report 1999, Ten years of Transition, EBRD, London.
13. Edquist, C., 1992. Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organisations Pinter, London, Washington.
14. Etzkovitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.), 1997. Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy. A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, Pinter, London, Washington.
15. Faulkner, W., Senker, J., 1994. Knowledge Frontiers: Public Sector Research and Industrial Innovation in Biotechnology, Engineering Ceramics, and Parallel Computing. Clarendon Press, Oxford, New York.
16. Freeman, C., 1991. Networks of Innovators: a synthesis of research issues. Research Policy 20, pp. 499-514.
17. Freeman, C., 2001. The learning economy and international inequality. In: Archibugi, D., Lundvall, B. (Eds.), The Globalising Learning Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 147-162.
18. Geisler, E., Rubenstein, A.H., 1989. University-industry relations: a review of major issues. In: Link, A.N., Tassey, G. (Eds.), Co-operative Research and Development: The Industry-University-Government Relationship. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 43-64.
19. Geuna, A., 1999. The changing rational for European University research funding: are there negative unintended consequences? Electronic Working Paper Series, Paper No. 33, SPRU, University of Sussex.
20. Gokhberg, L., 1996. Transformation of the Soviet R&D System. In: Russian Applied R&D: Its Problems. IIASA Economic Transition and Integration Project, Laxenbourg.
21. Guinet, J., Polt, W. (Eds.), 1998. New Rationale and Approaches in Technology and Innovation Policy (special issue). STI Review No. 22, OECD, Paris.
22. Havas A. Does innovation policy matter in a transition country? Journal of International Relations and Development. 5(4):2002;380-402.
23. Inzelt, A., 1995a. Review of recent developments in science and technology in Hungary. OECD, Paris.
24. Inzelt, A., 1995b. For a better understanding of the innovation process in Hungary, STEEP Discussion Paper, No. 22. SPRU, Brighton.
25. Inzelt, A., 2000. Science, technology and innovation: institutional and behavioral conditions for innovative industrial development. In: Wiedmaier, B., Potratz, W. (Eds.), Frameworks for Industrial Policy in Central and Eastern Europe.
26. Inzelt, A., 2002a. Restructuring and financing R&D: new partnerships. In: Varga, A., Szerb, L. (Eds.), Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Regional Economic Development: International Experiences and Hungarian Challenges, Pécs 2002.
27. Inzelt A. Attempts to survey innovation in the Hungarian service sector. Science and Public Policy. 29(5):2002;367-383.
28. Inzelt, A., 2003. A kicsik K+F és innovációs tevékenysége (R&D and innovative activity of the smalls), Külgazdaság, vol. XLVII, No. 11, Budapest.
29. Inzelt, A., Csonka, L., Forgács, I., 2003. Félúton a tudásalapú gazdaság felé (Midway towards a knowledge-based economy), Információs Társadalom, vol. III, No. 1, Budapest.
30. Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R., 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26, pp. 1-18.
31. Kline, S., Rosenberg, N., 1986. An overview of innovation. In: Landen, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 275-306.
32. Lundvall B.-A., Johnson B. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies. 1-2:1994;23-42.
33. Meyer-Krahmer, F., Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based Technologies: University-Industry Interactions in Four Fields, Research Policy 27, pp. 835-851.
34. Nelson, R.R., 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
35. OECD, 1993. Science, Technology and Innovation Policies. OECD, Hungary, Paris.
36. OECD-EUROSTAT, 1997. Oslo Manual, Paris.
37. OECD, 2001. Main Science and Technology Indicators, OECD, Paris.
38. Pavitt, K., 1996. National policies for technical change: Where are the increasing returns to economic research? In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, vol. 93, pp. 12693-12700.
39. Pavitt, K., 2002. Public policies to support basic research: What can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn), Industrial and Corporate Change.
40. Raymond, S.U., 1996. Listening to the critics: enlarging the discussion of policy for science-based development. In: Lessons from Global Experience in Policy for Science-Based Development, New York.
41. Senker J. Changing organisation of public sector research in Europe-implications for benchmarking human resources in RTD. Science and Public Policy. 28(4):2001;39-50.