Uninformative variable elimination assisted by Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalization/successive projection algorithm for descriptor selection in QSAR

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 128, Issue , 2013, Pages 56-65

  Omidikia, Nematollah ^a   Kompany Zareh, Mohsen ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES IN BASIC SCIENCES IASBS   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anti HIV drugs; Gram Schmidt Orthogonalization; Ordered variable selection; QSAR; Selwood data; Uninformative Variable Elimination

Indexed keywords

1 (2 HDYROXYETHOXYMETHYL) 6 (PHENYLTHIO)THYMINE DERIVATIVE; ANTI HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS AGENT; THYMINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; GRAM SCHMIDT ORTHOGONALIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PARTIAL LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; RELIABILITY; SUCCESSIVE PROJECTION ALGORITHM; UNINFORMATIVE VARIABLE ELIMINATION;

EID: 84882796205     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Laszlo T. Monte Carlo method for identification of outlier molecules in QSAR studies. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry 2010, 47:174-190.
2. Andersen C.M., Bro R. Variable selection in regression-a tutorial. Journal of Chemometrics 2010, 24:728-737.
3. Teófilo R.F., Martins J.P.A., Ferreira M.M.C. Sorting variables by using informative vectors as a strategy for feature selection in multivariate regression. Journal of Chemometrics 2009, 23:32-48.
4. Willies R.P., Swinkels D.A.J., Maeder M. Identification and application of a prognostic vector for use in multivariate calibration and prediction. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1992, 15:185-193.
5. Chong I.-G., Jun C.-H. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2005, 78:103-112.
6. Garido Frenich A., Jouan-Rimbaud D., Massart D.L., Martinez Galera M., Martinez Vidal J.L. Wavelength selection method for multicomponent spectrophotometric determinations using partial least squares. Analyst 1995, 120:2787-2792.
7. Kiralj R., Ferreira M.M.C. Is your QSAR/QSPR descriptor real or trash?. Journal of Chemometrics 2010, 24:681-693.
8. Kompany-Zareh M., Omidikia N. Jackknife-based selection of Gram-Schmidt Orthogonalized descriptors in QSAR. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2010, 50:2055-2066.
9. Anderssen E., Dyrstad K., Westad F., Martens H. Reducing overoptimism in variable selection by cross-model validation. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2006, 84:69-74.
10. Westad F., Martens H. Variable selection in near infrared spectroscopy based on significance testing in partial least square regression. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 2000, 8:117-124.
11. Daszykowski M., Wrobel M.S., Czarnik-Matusewicz H., Walczak B. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy and multivariate calibration techniques applied to modelling the crude protein, fiber and fat content in rapeseed meal. Analyst 2008, 133:1523-1531.
12. Wisnowski J.W., Simpson J.R., Montgomery D.C., Runger G.C. Resampling methods for variable selection in robust regression. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2003, 43:341-355.
13. Xu H., Liu Z., Cai W., Shao X. A wavelength selection method based on randomization test for near-infrared spectral analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2009, 97:189-193.
14. Faber N.M., Meinders M.J., Geladi P., Sjostrom M., Buydens L.M.C., Kateman G. Random error bias in principal component analysis. Part Ι. Derivation of theoreticalpredictions. Analytica Chimica Acta 1665, 304:257-271.
15. Centner V., Massart D.L., de Noord O.E., de Jong S., Vandeginste B.M.V., Sterna C. Elimination of uninformative variables for multivariate calibration. Analytical Chemistry 1996, 68:3851-3858.
16. Komsta L. A functional-based approach to the retention in thin layer chromatographic screening systems. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008, 629:66-72.
17. Daszykowski M., Stanimirova I., Walczak B., Daeyaert F., de Jonge M.R., Heeres J., Koymans L.M.H., Lewi P.J., Vinkers H.M., Janssen P.A., Massart D.L. Improving QSAR models for the biological activity of HIV Reverse Transcriptase inhibitors: aspects of outlier detection and uninformative variable elimination. Talanta 2005, 68:54-60.
18. Polanski J., Gieleciak R. The comparative molecular surface analysis (CoMSA) with modified uninformative variable elimination-PLS (UVE-PLS) method: application to the steroids binding the aromatase enzyme. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 2003, 43:656-666.
19. Bak A., Polanski J. A 4D-QSAR study on anti-HIV HEPT analogues. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 2006, 14:273-279.
20. Czekaj T., Wu W., Walczak B. Classification of genomic data: some aspects of feature selection. Talanta 2008, 76:564-574.
21. 1H NMR spectral analysis. European Food Research and Technology 2010, 230:981-988.
22. Griffiths M.L., Svozil D., Worsfold P., Denham S., Evans H. Variable reduction algorithm for atomic emission spectra: application to multivariate calibration and quantitative analysis of industrial samples. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 2002, 17:800-812.
23. Balabin R.M., Smirnov R.M. Variable selection in near-infrared spectroscopy: benchmarking of feature selection methods on biodiesel data. Analytica Chimica Acta 2011, 692:63-72.
24. Moros J., Kuligowski J., Quintás G., Garrigues S., Guardia M.D.L. New cut-off criterion for uninformative variable elimination in multivariate calibration of near-infrared spectra for the determination of heroin in illicit street drugs. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008, 630:150-160.
25. Koshoubu J., Iwata T., Minami S. Application of the modified UVE-PLS method for a mid-infrared absorption spectral data set of water ethanol mixtures. Applied Spectroscopy 2000, 54:148-152.
26. Cai W., Li Y., Shao X. A variable selection method based on uninformative variable elimination for multivariate calibration of near-infrared spectra. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2008, 90:188-194.
27. Han Q.-J., Wu H.-L., Cai C.-B., Xu L., Yu R.-Q. An ensemble of Monte Carlo uninformative variable elimination for wavelength selection. Analytica Chimica Acta 2008, 612:121-125.
28. Baumann K. Cross-validation as the objective functions for variable selection techniques. Trends in Analytical Chemistry 2003, 22:395-406.
29. Faber N.M. Improved computation of the standard error in the regression coefficient estimates of a multivariate calibration model. Analytical Chemistry 2000, 72:4675-4676.
30. Bodzioch K., Durand A., Kaliszan R., Baczek T., Heyden Y.V. Advanced QSRR modeling of peptides behavior in RPLC. Talanta 2010, 81:1711-1718.
31. Martens H., Naes T. Multivariate Calibration 1993, Wiley, London.
32. Araujo M.C.U., Saldanha T.C.B., Galvaõ R.K.H., Yoneyama T., Chame H.C., Visani V. The successive projections algorithm for variable selection in spectroscopic multicomponent analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2001, 57:65-73.
33. Filho H.A.D., Souza E.S.O.N., Visani V., Barros S.R.R.C., Saldanha T.C.B., Araújo M.C.U., Galvão R.K.H. Simultaneous spectrometric determination of Cu2+, Mn2+ and Zn2+ in polivitaminic/polimineral drug using SPA and GA algorithms for variable selection. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society 2005, 16:58-61.
34. Kompany-Zareh M., Akhlaghi Y. Application of radial basis function networks and successive projection algorithm in a QSAR study of anti-HIV activity for a large group of HEPT derivatives. Journal of Chemometrics 2006, 20:1-12.
35. Filho H.A.D., Galvão R.K.H., Araújo M.C.U., Silva E.C., Saldanha T.C.B., José G.E., Pasquini C., Raimundo I.M., Rohwedder J.J.R.A. A strategy for selecting calibration samples for multivariate modeling. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2004, 72:83-91.
36. Ye S., Wang D., Min S. Successive projections algorithm combined with uninformative variable elimination for spectral variable selection. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 2008, 91:194-199.
37. Kompany-Zareh M., Akhlaghi Y. Correlation Weighted successive projections algorithm as a novel method for variable selection in QSAR studies: investigation of anti-HIV activity of HEPT derivatives. Journal of Chemometrics 2007, 21:239-250.
38. Amic D., Davidovic-Amic D., Juric A., Lucic B., Trinajstic N. Structure-activity correlation of flavone derivatives for inhibition of CAMP phosphodiesterase. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1995, 35:1034-1038.
39. Selwood D.L., Livingstone D.J., Comley J.C.W., O'Dowd A.B.., Hudson A.T., Jackson P., Jandu K.S., Rose V.S., Stables J.N. Structure-activity relationships of antifilarial antimycin analogues: a multivariate pattern recognition study. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1990, 33:136-142.
40. Tanaka H., Takashima H., Ubasawa M., Sekiya K., Nitta I., Baba M., Shigata S., Walker R.T., Declercq E., Miyasaka T. Structure-activity relationships of 1-[(2-hydroxyethoxy)methyl]-6-(phenylthio)-thiamine analogues: effect of substitutions at the C-6 phenyl ring and the C-5 position on anti-HIV-1 activity. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 1992, 35:337-345.
41. Consonni V., Ballabio D., Todeschini R. Comments on the definition of the Q2 parameter for QSAR validation. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2009, 49:1669-1678.
42. Cho S.J., Hermsmeier M.A. Genetic algorithm guided selection: variable selection and subset selection. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 2002, 42:927-936.
43. Kubinyi H. Variable selection in QSAR studies. I. An evolutionary algorithm. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 1994, 13:285-294.
44. Luke B.T. Evolutionary programming applied to the development of quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1994, 34:1279-1287.
45. McFarland J.W., Gans D.J. On identifying likely determinants of biological activity in high-dimensional QSAR. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships 1994, 13:11-17.
46. Rogers D.R., Hopfinger A. Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1994, 34:854-866.
47. Todeschin R., Consonni V., Mauri A., Pavan M. Detecting "bad" regression models: multicriteria fitness functions in regression analysis. Analytica Chimica Acta 2004, 515:199-208.
48. Waller C.L. Development and validation of a novel variable selection technique with application to multidimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1999, 39:345-355.
49. Luco J.M., Ferretti F.H. QSAR based on Multiple Linear Regression and PLS methods for the anti-HIV activity of a large group of HEPT derivatives. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 1997, 37:392-401.
50. Garg R., Gupta S.P., Gao H., Babu M.S., Debnath A.K. Comparative quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on anti-HIV drugs. Chemical Reviews 1999, 99:3525-3601.
51. Jalali-Heravi M., Parastar F. Use of artificial neural networks in a QSAR study of anti-HIV activity for a large group of HEPT derivatives. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 2000, 40:147-154.
52. Bazoui H., Zahouily M., Boulajaaj S., Zakarya D. QSAR for anti-HIV activity of HEPT derivatives. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 2002, 13:567-577.
53. Douali L., Villemin D., Cherqaoui D. Neural networks: accurate nonlinear QSAR model for HEPT derivatives. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences 2003, 43:1200-1207.
54. Mercader A.G., Duchowicz P.R., Fernandez F.M., Castro E.A. Advances in the replacement and enhanced replacement method in QSAR and QSPR theories. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2011, 51:1575-1581.