Gyroscope-driven mouse pointer with an EMOTIV™ EEG headset and data analysis based on empirical mode decomposition

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 10561-10583

  Rosas Cholula, Gerardo ^a   Ramirez Cortes, Juan Manuel ^a   Alarcon Aquino, Vicente ^b   Gomez Gil, Pilar ^a   Rangel Magdaleno, Jose de Jesus ^a   Reyes Garcia, Carlos ^a  

^a INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ASTROFÍSICA   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS AMÉRICAS PUEBLA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Electroencephalographic signals; Empirical mode decomposition; Gyroscope driven; Kalman filter

Indexed keywords

GYROSCOPES; KALMAN FILTERS; MAMMALS;

ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC SIGNALS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC SIGNAL; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; GYROSCOPE-DRIVEN; STATE ESTIMATORS; WIRELESS HEADSETS;

SIGNAL DETECTION;

EID: 84882732166     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s130810561     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Karpov, A.; Ronzhin, A.; Kipyatkova, I. An Assistive Bi-Modal User Interface Integrating Multi-Channel Speech Recognition and Computer Vision. In Human-Computer Interaction; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 6762, pp. 454-463.
2. Duan, X.; Gao, G. A Survey of Computer Systems for People with Physical Disabilities. In Electronics and Signal Processing, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 97, pp. 547-552.
3. Islam, M.O.; Mandalt, A.K.; Hossain, M.D. ThirdHand: A Novel and Cost-Effective HCI for Physically Handicapped People. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT 2011), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 22-24 December 2011.
4. Gao, G.W.; Duan, X.Y. An overview of human-computer interaction based on the camera for disabled people. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 219, 1317-1320.
5. Betke, M.; Gips, J.; Fleming, P. The camera mouse: Visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 2002, 10, 1-10.
6. Harada, S.; Wobbrock, J.; Malkin, J.; Bilmes, J.; Landay, J.A. Longitudinal Study of People Learning to Use Continuous Voice-Based Cursor Control. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA, 4-9 April 2009.
7. Felzer, T.; Nordmann, R. Evaluating the Hands-Free Mouse Control System: An Initial Case Study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCH), Linz, Austria, 9-11 July 2008; pp. 1188-1195.
8. Chavez, J.R.; Aviles-Cruz, C. Pattern recognition applied to mouse pointer controlled by ocular movements. WSEAS Trans. Syst. 2009, 4, 511-520.
9. Knezik, J.; Drahansky, M. Simple EEG driven mouse cursor movement. Comput. Recogn. Syst. 2007, 2, 526-531.
10. McFarland, D.J.; Krusienski, D.J.; Sarnacki, W.A.; Wolpaw, J.R. Emulation of computer mouse control with a noninvasive brain-computer interface. J. Neural Eng. 2008, 5, 101-110.
11. Emotiv-Brain Computer Interface Technology. Available online: http://www.emotiv.com (accessed on 14 January 2013).
12. Ravi, K.; Wright, F.P. Augmenting the instant messaging experience through the use of BCI and gestural technologies. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 29, 178-191.
13. Esfahani, E.T.; Sundararajan, V. Classification of primitive shapes using brain-computer interfaces. Comput. Aided Des. 2012, 44, 1011-1019.
14. Duvinage, M.; Castermans, T.; Dutoit, T.; Petieau, M.; Hoellinger, T.; de Saedeleer, C.; Seetharaman, K.; Cheron, G. A P300-Based Quantitative Comparison between the Emotiv Epoc Headset and a Medical EEG Device. In Proceedings of the 9th IASTED International Conference Biomedical Engineering, Innsbruck, Austria, 15-17 February 2012.
15. Gomez-Gil, J.; San-Jose-Gonzalez, I.; Nicolas-Alonso, L.F.; Alonso-Garcia, S. Steering a tractor by means of an EMG-based human-machine interface. Sensors 2011, 11, 7110-7126.
16. Mognon, A.; Jovicich, J.; Bruzzone, L.; Buiatti, M. ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detectorbased on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology 2011, 48, 229-240.
17. Gao, J.; Lin, P.; Yang, Y.; Wang, P. Automatic Removal of Eye-Blink Artifacts Based on ICA and Peak Detection Algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Asia Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, Wuhan, China, 6-7 March 2010; pp. 22-27.
18. Krishnaveni, V.; Jayaraman, S.; Aravind, S.; Hariharasudhan, V.; Ramadoss, K. Automatic identification and Removal of ocular artifacts from EEG using wavelet transform. Meas. Sci. Rev. 2006, 6, 45-57.
19. Salinas, R.; Schachter, E.; Miranda, M. Recognition and Real-Time Detection of Blinking Eyes on Electroencephalographic Signals Using Wavelet Transform. In Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 682-690.
20. Romo-Vázquez, R.; Ranta, R.; Louis-Dorr, V.; Maquin, D. Ocular Artifacts Removal in Scalp EEG: Combining ICA and Wavelet Denoising. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Physics in Signal and Image Processing, Mulhouse, France, 1-3 February 2007.
21. Tiganj, Z.; Mboup, M.; Pouzat, C.; Belkoura, L. An Algebraic Method for Eye Blink Artifacts Detection in Single Channel EEG Recordings. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Biomagnetism Biomag, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 28 March-1 April 2010.
22. Looney, D.; Li, L.; Rutkowski, T.M.; Mandic, D.P.; Cichocki, A. Ocular Artifacts Removal from EEG Using EMD. In Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2008; pp. 831-835.
23. Paritala, A.R.C.; Sarma, N.S.; Raja, S.K.; Dhana, R.V. An interface of human and machine with eye blinking. Int. J. Res. Comput. Commun. Technol. 2012, 1, 429-435.
24. Lin, M.; Li, B. A Wireless EOG-Based Human Computer Interface. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Yantai, China, 16-18 October 2010.
25. Gupta, S.S.; Soman, S.; Raj, P.G.; Prakash, R.; Sailaja, S.; Borgohain, R. Detecting Eye Movements in EEG for Controlling Devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics, Bali, Indonesia, 12-14 July 2012.
26. Huang, M.; Wu, P.; Liu, Y.; Bi, L.; Chen, H. Application and Contrast in Brain-Computer Interface between Hilbert-Huang Transform and Wavelet Transform. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference for Young Computer Scientists, Hunan, China, 18-21 November 2008; pp. 1706-1710.
27. Bulling, A.; Ward, J.A.; Gellersen, H.; Troster, G. Eye movement analysis for activity recognition using electrooculography. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2011, 33, 741-753.
28. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.T.; Jung, T.P. A Collaborative Brain-Computer Interface. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Shanghai, China, 15-17 October 2011; pp. 580-583.
29. McMenamin, B.W.; Shackman, A.J.; Maxwell, J.S.; Bachhuber, D.R.W.; Koppenhaver, A.M.; Greischar, L.L.; Davidson, R.J. Validation of ICA-based myogenic artifact correction for scalp and source-localized EEG. Neuroimage 2010, 49, 2416-2432.
30. Nicolas-Alonso, L.F.; Gomez-Gil, J. Brain computer interfaces, a review. Sensors 2012, 12, 1211-1279.
31. Plochl, M.; Ossandón, J.P.; Konig, P. Combining EEG and eye tracking: Identification, characterization and correction of eye movement artifacts in electroencephalographic data. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2012, 278, 1-23.
32. Gwin, J.T.; Gramann, K.; Makeig, S.; Ferris, D.P. Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103, 3526-3534.
33. Kurian, N.; Rishikesh, D. Real time based driver's safeguard system by analyzing human physiological signals. Int. J. Eng. Trends Technol. 2013, 4, 41-45.
34. Wissel, T.; Palaniappan, R. Considerations on strategies to improve EOG signal analysis. ACM Int. J. Artif. Life Res. 2011, 2, 6-21.
35. Barea, R.; Boquete, L.; Rodriguez-Ascariz, J.; Ortega, S.; Lopez, E. Sensory system for implementing a human-computer interface based on electrooculography. Sensors 2011, 11, 310-328.
36. Paulchamy, B.; Vennila, I. A certain exploration on EEG signal for the removal of artefacts using power spectral density analysis through haar wavelet transform. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2012, 42, 8-13.
37. Araghi, L.F. A New Method for Artifact Removing in EEG Signals. In Proceedings of the International Multiconference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, China, 17-19 March 2010; pp. 420-423.
38. Kumar, P.; Arumuganathan, R.; Sivakumar, K.; Vimal, C. Removal of ocular artifacts in the EEG through wavelet transform without using an EOG reference channel. Int. J. Open Probl. Comput. Math. 2008, 1, 188-200.
39. Senthil-Kumar, P.; Arumuganathan, R.; Sivakumar, K.; Vimal, C. Removal of Artifacts from EEG Signals Using Adaptive Filter through Wavelet Transform. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing, China, 26-29 October 2008; pp. 2138-2141.
40. Hsu, W.; Lin, C.; Hsu, H.; Chen, P.; Chen, I. Wavelet-based envelope features with automatic EOG artifact removal: Application to single-trial EEG data. Int. J. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 2743-2749.
41. Yong, X.; Ward, R.; Birch, G. Artifact Removal in EEG Using Morphological Component Analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Taipei, Taiwan, 19-24April 2009; pp. 345-348.
42. Lin, J.; Yang, W. Wireless brain-computer interface for electric wheelchairs with EEG and eye-blinking signals. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 2012, 8, 6011-6024.
43. Shahabi, H.; Moghimi, S.; Zamiri-Jafarian, H. EEG Eye Blink Artifact Removal by EOG Modeling and Kalman Filter. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Chongqing, China, 16-18 October 2012; pp. 496-500.
44. Molla, M.K.I.; Tanaka, T.; Rutkowski, T.M. Multivariate EMD Based Approach to EOG Artifacts Separation from EEG. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Kyoto, Japan, 25-30 March 2012; pp. 653-656.
45. Li, M; Yang, L.; Yang, J. A fully automatic method of removing EOG artifacts from EEG recordings. Commun. Inf. Sci. Manag. Eng. 2011, 1, 1-6.
46. Jung, T.; Makeig, S.; Westerfield, M.; Townsenda, J.; Courchesnea, E.; Sejnowski, T. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111, 1745-1758.
47. Woltering, S.; Bazargani, N.; Liu, Z. Eye blink correction: A test on the preservation of common ERP components using a regression based technique. PeerJ 2013, 76, 1-11.
48. Balaiah, P. Comparative evaluation of adaptive filter and neuro-fuzzy filter in artifacts removal from electroencephalogram signal. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2012, 9, 1583-1593.
49. Nolan, H.; Whelan, R.; Reilly, R.B. FASTER: Fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J. Neurosci. Methods 2010, 192, 152-162.
50. Cai, H.; Ma, J.; Shi, L.; Lu, B. A Novel Method for EOG Features Extraction from the Forehead. In Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Boston, MA, USA, 1-3 September 2011; pp. 3075-3078.
51. Huang, N.E.; Shen, Z.; Long, S.R.; Wu, M.L.; Shih, H.H.; Zheng, Q.; Yen, N.C.; Tung, C.C.; Liu, H.H. The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 1998, 454, 903-995.
52. Nunes, J.C.; Guyot, S.; Del'echelle, E. Texture analysis based on local analysis of the bidimensional empirical mode decomposition. Mach. Vis. Appl. 2005, 16, 177-188.
53. Janusauskas, A.; Jurkonis, R.; Lukosevicius, A. The empirical mode decomposition and the discrete wavelet transform for detection of human cataract in ultrasound signals. Informatica 2005, 16, 541-556.
54. Charleston-Villalobos, S.; González-Camarena, R.; Chi-Lem, G.; Aljama-Corrales, T. Crackle sounds analysis by empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 2007, 26, 40-47.
55. Liu, B.; Riemenschneider, S.; Xu, Y. Gearbox fault diagnosis using empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2006, 20, 718-734.
56. Bi, N.; Sun, Q.; Huang, D.; Yang, Z.; Huang, J. Robust image watermarking based on multiband wavelets and empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2007, 16, 1956-1966.
57. Ciniburk, J. Suitability of Huang Hilbert Transformation for ERP Detection. In Proceedings of the 9th International PhD Workshop on Systems and Control: Young Generation Viewpoint, Izola, Slovenia, 1-3 October 2008.
58. Zhou, Z.; Wan, B.; Ming, D.; Qi, H. A novel technique for phase synchrony measurement from the complex motor imaginary potential of combined body and limb action. J. Neural Eng. 2010, 7, 1-11.
59. Sweeney-Reed, C.M.; Andrade, A.O.; Nasuto, S.J. Empirical Mode Decomposition of EEG Signals for Synchronisation Analysis. In Proceedings of the IEEE Postgraduate Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Southampton, UK, 9-11 August 2004.
60. Cambron, M.; Anseeuw, S.; Paemeleire, K.; Crevits, L. Saccade behaviour in migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2011, 31, 1005-1014.
61. Chen, X.J.; Yang, Y.M.; He, W.; Wang, J.G.; Mao, Y.X. Grey forecasting model for patching blinking in video-oculography. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 121-126, 3955-3959.
62. Klier, E.M.; Meng, H.; Angelaki, D.E. Revealing the kinematics of the oculomotor plant with tertiary eye positions and ocular counterroll. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 105, 640-649.
63. Rilling, G.; Flandrin, P.; Goncalves, P. On Empirical Mode Decomposition and Its Algorithms. In Proceedings of the IEEE EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing, Grado, Italy, 8-11 June 2003; pp. 8-11.
64. Hu, H.; Ma, J.; Tian, J. A new electronic image stabilization technology based on random ferns for fixed scene. In Network Computing and Information Security; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 345, pp. 501-508.
65. Tsai, C.Y.; Dutoit, X.; Song, K.T.; van Brussel, H.; Nuttin, M. Robust face tracking control of a mobile robot using self-tuning Kalman filter and echo state network. Asian J. Control 2010, 12, 488-509.
66. Wang, B.R.; Xu, Y.; Jin, Y.L. Jitter Compensation Using Fuzzy Rules and Kalman Filter for Mobile Robots Vision. In Proceedings of the IEEE Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Mianyang, China, 23-25 May 2011; pp. 4134-4138.
67. Zarchan, P.; Mussoff, H. Fundamentals of Kalman Filtering: A Practical Approach, 3rd ed.; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2009.
68. Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2006, 27, 861-874.