Historicizing planning, problematizing participation

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1527-1541

  Huxley, Margo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critical policy histories; Foucault; Participation; Problematization; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PLANNING THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY;

EID: 84882730116     PISSN: 03091317     EISSN: 14682427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12045     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abram, S. (2000) Planning the public: some comments on empirical problems for planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19.4, 351-357.
2. Abram, S. (2011) Culture and planning. Ashgate, London.
3. Arnstein, S. (1969 [2000]) A ladder of citizen participation. In R. LeGates and F. Stout (eds.), The city reader, Routledge, New York, NY.
4. Barry, A., T. Osborne and N. Rose (eds.) (1996) Foucault and political reason: liberalism, neoliberalism and rationalities of government. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
5. Beebeejaun, Y. (2004) What's in a nation? Constructing ethnicity in the British planning system. Planning Theory and Practice 5.4, 437-451.
6. Booth, P. (2011) Culture, planning and path dependence: some reflections on the problems of comparison. Town Planning Review 82.1, 13-28.
7. Booth, P. and M. Huxley (2012) 1909 and all that: reflection on the Housing, Town Planning, Etc. Act 1909. Town Planning Review 82.1, 13-28.
8. Brenner, N., J. Peck and N. Theodore (2010) Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks 33.3, 349-379.
9. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Clarke, N. (2012) Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography 36.1, 25-43.
11. Cochrane, A. (2007) Understanding urban policy: a critical approach. Blackwell, Oxford.
12. Collins, K. and R. Ison (2009) Jumping off Arnstein's ladder: social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance 19.6, 358-373.
13. Connelly, S. and T. Richardson (2004) Reinventing public participation in the age of consensus. In P. Blundell-Jones, D. Petrescu and J. Till (eds.), Architecture and participation, Routledge, London.
14. Cooke, B. and U. Kothari (eds.) (2001) Participation: the new tyranny? Zed Books, London.
15. Cornwall, A. and V.S.P. Coelho (eds.) (2007) Spaces for change: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. Zed Books, London.
16. Cornwell, A. (2008) Unpacking 'participation': models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal 43.3, 269-283.
17. Damer, S. and C. Hague (1971) Public participation in planning: a review. Town Planning Review 42.3, 217-232.
18. Dean, M. (1992) A genealogy of the government of poverty. Economy and Society 21.3, 215-251.
19. Etzioni, A. (1998) The new golden rule: community and morality in a democratic society. Basic Books, New York, NY.
20. Fincher, R. and K. Iveson (2008) Planning and diversity in the city: redistribution, recognition and encounter. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
21. Fischler, R. (1998) Toward a genealogy of planning: zoning and the welfare state. Planning Perspectives 13.4, 389-410.
22. Fischler, R. (2000) Linking planning theory and history: the case of development control. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19.3, 233-241.
23. Forester, J. (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
24. Forester, J. (2009) Dealing with differences: dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
25. Foucault, M. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge. Tavistock, London.
26. Foucault, M. (2000) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In J. Faubion (ed.), Essential works, volume 2: aesthetics, method and epistemology, Penguin Books, London.
27. Foucault, M. (2001) Fearless speech. Edited by J. Pearson, Semiotext(e), Los Angeles, CA.
28. Friedmann, J. (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Progress in Planning 64.3, 183-234.
29. Goodman, R. (1972) After the planners. Pelican, Harmondsworth.
30. Harrison, P., A. Todes and V. Watson (2008) Planning and transformation: learning from post-apartheid experience. Routledge, London.
31. Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, Basingstoke.
32. Healey, P. (2013) Circuits of knowledge and techniques: the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37.5, 1510-1526.
33. Held, D. (2006) Models of democracy. Third edition, Polity Press, Cambridge.
34. Henkel, H. and R. Stirrat (2001) Participation as spiritual duty: empowerment as secular subjection. In B. Cooke and U. Kothari (eds.), Participation: the new tyranny?, Zed Books, London.
35. Hickey, S. and G. Mohan (eds.) (2004) Participation: from tyranny to transformation? Exploring new approaches to participation in development. Zed Books, London.
36. Hindess, B. (1996) Discourses of power: from Hobbes to Foucault. Blackwell, Oxford.
37. Huxley, M. (2000) The limits to communicative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 19.4, 369-377.
38. Huxley, M. (2006) Spatial rationalities: order, environment, evolution and government. Social and Cultural Geography 7.5, 771-787.
39. Huxley, M. (2010) Problematizing planning: critical and effective genealogies. In J. Hillier and P. Healey (eds.), The Ashgate research companion to planning theory: conceptual challenges for spatial planning, Ashgate, Farnham.
40. Huxley, M. (2011) The specific and the general: the designation of planning problems. CRIOS (Critica degli Ordinamenti Spaziali) 2, 21-30.
41. Jacobs, J. (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York, NY.
42. Jazeel, T. (2011) Spatialising difference beyond cosmopolitanism: rethinking planetary futures. Theory, Culture and Society 28.5, 75-97.
43. Keith, M. (2005) After the cosmopolitan? Multicultural cities and the future of racism. Routledge, London.
44. Kothari, U. (ed.) (2005) A radical history of development studies: individuals, institutions and ideologies. Zed Books, London.
45. LeGates, R. and F. Stout (eds.) (2000) The city reader. Routledge, London.
46. Leino, H. and M. Laine (2012) Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation. Planning Theory 11.1, 89-103.
47. Levin, P. and D. Donnison (1969) People and planning. Public Administration 13, 473-479.
48. Long, M. (1981) Planning: 'birth' or 'break'? Problems in the historiography of British town planning. Working Paper 18, Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
49. Low, N. (1991) Planning, politics and the state: political foundations of planning thought. Unwin Hyman, London.
50. McAuslan, P. (1980) The ideologies of planning law. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
51. McCann, E. (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: towards a research agenda. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 101.1, 107-130.
52. McFarlane, C. (2010) The comparative city: knowledge, learning and urbanism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 34.4, 725-742.
53. McFarlane, C. (2011) Learning the city: knowledge and translocal assemblage. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
54. Mufti, A. (2005) Global comparativism. Critical Enquiry 31 (winter), 472-489.
55. Nasr, J. and M. Volait (eds.) ( 2003) Urbanism: imported or exported? Native aspirations and foreign plans. Wiley-Academy, Chichester.
56. Owen, D. (1995) Genealogy as exemplary critique: reflections on Foucault and the imagination of the political. Economy and Society 24.4, 489-506.
57. Patton, C. (2005) Participation. In T. Bennett, L. Grossberg and M. Morris (eds.), New keywords: a revised vocabulary of culture and society, Blackwell, Oxford.
58. Peck. J. and N. Theodore (2010) Mobilizing policy: models, methods and mutations. Geoforum 41.2, 169-174.
59. Pieterse, E. (2010) Cityness and African urban development. Urban Forum 21.3, 205-221.
60. Pløger, J. (2004) Strife: urban planning and agonism. Planning Theory 3.1, 71-92.
61. Porter, L. (2010) Unlearning the colonial cultures of planning. Ashgate, London.
62. Rankin, K. (2009) Critical development studies and the praxis of planning. City 13.2/3, 219-229.
63. Robinson, J. (2003) Postcolonialising geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24.3, 273-289.
64. Robinson, J. (2006) Ordinary cities: between modernity and development. Routledge, London.
65. Robinson, J. (2011) Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35.1, 1-23.
66. Rose, N. (1994) Medicine, history and the present. In C. Jones and R. Porter (eds.), Reassessing Foucault: power, medicine and the body, Routledge, London.
67. Rose, N. (1999) Power of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
68. Roy, A. (2006) Praxis in the time of empire. Planning Theory 5.1, 7-29.
69. Roy, A. (2008) Post-liberalism: on the ethico-politics of planning. Planning Theory 7.1, 92-102.
70. Roy, A. (2009) Why India cannot plan its cities: informality, insurgence, and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory 8.1, 76-87.
71. Rydin, Y. (1999) Public participation in planning. In B. Cullingworth (ed.), British planning: 50 years of urban and regional policy, Athlone Press, London.
72. Sandercock, L. (ed.) (1998) Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Wiley, Chichester.
73. Sandercock, L. (2003) Cosmopolis II: mongrel cities in the 21st century. Continuum, London.
74. Sanyal, B. (ed.) (2005) Comparative planning cultures. Routledge, New York, NY.
75. Scott, D. (1999) Refashioning futures: criticism after postcoloniality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
76. Scott, D. (2003) Culture in political theory. Political Theory 31.1, 92-115.
77. Scott, D. (2004) Conscripts of modernity: the tragedy of colonial enlightenment. Duke University Press, Durham, NC and London.
78. Skeffington Report (1969) People and planning: report of the Committee on Public Participation in Planning. HMSO, London.
79. Taylor, N. (1998) Planning theory since 1945. Sage, London.
80. Thomas, H. (2000) Race and planning: the UK experience. UCL Press, London.
81. Tooke, J. (2003) Spaces for community involvement: processes of disciplining and appropriation. Space and Polity 7.3, 233-246.
82. Thornley, A. (1977) Theoretical perspectives on planning participation. Progress in Planning 7.1, 1-57.
83. Valverde, M. (1996) 'Despotism' and ethical liberal governance. Economy and Society 25.3, 357-372.
84. Ward, S. (1994) Planning and urban change. Paul Chapman, London.
85. Ward, S. (2002) Planning the twentieth-century city: the advanced capitalist world. Wiley, Chichester.
86. Watson, V. (2006) Deep difference: diversity, planning and ethics. Planning Theory 5.1, 31-50.
87. Weber, M. (1905 [2002]) The protestant ethic and the 'spirit' of capitalism, and other writings. Translated by P. Baehr and G. Wells, Penguin Books, London.
88. Winkler, T. (2011) On the liberal moral project of planning in South Africa. Urban Forum 22.1 [WWW document]. URL www.springerlink.com.eresources.shef.ac.uk/content/109702/ (accessed 28 February 2011).
89. Yiftachel, O. (2009) Theoretical notes on 'gray cities': the coming of 'urban apartheid'? Planning Theory 8.1, 88-100.