Distinct contribution of the parietal and temporal cortex to hand configuration and contextual judgements about tools

Cortex

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2097-2105

  Andres, Michael ^a,b   Pelgrims, Barbara ^a   Olivier, Etienne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Action; Semantic memory; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Upper limb apraxia

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DISSOCIATION; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MIDDLE TEMPORAL GYRUS; NEURONAVIGATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PERCEPTION; SEMANTIC MEMORY; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SUPRAMARGINAL GYRUS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ACTION; SEMANTIC MEMORY; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; UPPER-LIMB APRAXIA;

ADULT; APRAXIAS; BRAIN MAPPING; HAND; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TEMPORAL LOBE; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION;

EID: 84882692090     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 19738102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.11.013     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Andres M., Pelgrims B., Michaux N., Olivier E., Pesenti M. Role of distinct parietal areas in arithmetic: An fMRI-guided TMS study. NeuroImage 2011, 54:3048-3056.
2. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:617-645.
3. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 2002, 34:149-159.
4. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., Martin A. fMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:991-1001.
5. Beauchamp M.S., Martin A. Grounding object concepts in perception and action: Evidence from fMRI studies of tools. Cortex 2007, 43(3):461-468.
6. Binder J.R., Desai R.H., Graves W.W., Conant L.L. Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2767-2796.
7. Bohlhalter S., Vanbellingen T., Bertschi M., Wurtz P., Cazzoli D., Nyffeler T., et al. Interference with gesture production by theta burst stimulation over left inferior frontal cortex. Clinical Neurophysiology 2011, 122(6):1197-1202.
8. Boronat C.B., Buxbaum L.J., Coslett H.B., Tang K., Saffran E.M., Kimberg D.Y., et al. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 23:361-373.
9. Brambati S.M., Myers D., Wilson A., Rankin K.P., Allison S.C., Rosen H.J., et al. The anatomy of category-specific object naming in neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18(10):1644-1653.
10. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: Dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain and Language 2002, 82:179-199.
11. Buxbaum L.J., Saffran E.M. Knowing 'how' vs 'what for': A new dissociation. Brain and Language 1998, 65:73-86.
12. Buxbaum L.J., Schwartz M.F., Carew T.G. The role of semantic memory in object use. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1997, 14:219-254.
13. Buxbaum L.J., Veramontil T., Schwartz M.F. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing "what for" but not "how". Neurocase 2000, 6:83-97.
14. Canessa N., Borgo F., Cappa S.F., Perani D., Falini A., Buccino G., et al. The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: An FMRI study. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:740-751.
15. Capitani E., Laiacona M., Mahon B., Caramazza A. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:213-261.
16. Caramazza A., Shelton J.R. Domain specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:1-34.
17. Chao L.L., Haxby J.V., Martin A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 1999, 2:913-919.
18. Clerget E., Winderickx A., Fadiga L., Olivier E. Role of Broca's area in encoding sequential human actions: A virtual lesion study. NeuroReport 2009, 20:1496-1499.
19. Epstein R., Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598-601.
20. Fazio P., Cantagallo A., Craighero L., D'Ausilio A., Roy A.C., Pozzo T., et al. Encoding of human action in Broca's area. Brain 2009, 132:1980-1988.
21. Frey S.H. Tool use, communicative gesture and cerebral asymmetries in the modern human brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Science 2008, 363:1951-1957.
22. Gallese V., Lakoff G. The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2005, 22:455-479.
23. Goldenberg G. Apraxia and the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1449-1459.
24. Goldenberg G., Hagmann S. Tool use and mechanical problem solving in apraxia. Neuropsychologia 1998, 43:625-637.
25. Goldenberg G., Hermsdörfer J., Glindemann R., Rorden C., Karnath H.O. Pantomime of tool use depends on integrity of left inferior frontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:2769-2776.
26. Goldenberg G., Karnath H.O. The neural basis of imitation is body part specific. Journal of Neuroscience 2006, 26:6282-6287.
27. Goldenberg G., Spatt J. The neural basis of tool use. Brain 2009, 132:1645-1655.
28. Goodale M.A., Milner A.D. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience 1992, 15:20-25.
29. Grèzes J., Tucker M., Armony J., Ellis R., Passingham R.E. Objects automatically potentiate action: An fMRI study of implicit processing. European Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 17:2735-2740.
30. Johnson-Frey S.H., Newman-Norlund R., Grafton S.T. A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills. Cerebral Cortex 2005, 15:681-695.
31. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Science 2004, 8:71-78.
32. Kalénine S., Buxbaum Laurel J., Coslett H.B. Critical brain regions for action recognition: Lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain 2010, 133:3269-3280.
33. Kanwisher N., Stanley D., Harris A. The fusiform face area is selective for faces not animals. NeuroReport 1999, 10:183-187.
34. Kellenbach M.L., Brett M., Patterson K. Actions speak louder than functions: The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:30-46.
35. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20(3):433-450.
36. Mahon B.Z., Caramazza A. Concepts and categories: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:27-51.
37. Mahon B.Z., Milleville S.C., Negri G.A.L., Rumiati R.I., Caramazza A., Martin A. Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream. Neuron 2007, 55:507-520.
38. Mahon B.Z., Schwarzbach J., Caramazza A. The representation of tools in left parietal cortex is independent of visual experience. Psychological Science 2010, 21:764-771.
39. Martin A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 2007, 58:25-45.
40. Martin A., Ungerleider L.G., Haxby J.V. Category-specificity and the brain: The sensory-motor model of semantic representations of objects. The New Cognitive Neurosciences 2000, 1023-1036. MIT Press, Cambridge. 2nd ed. M.S. Gazzaniga (Ed.).
41. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The Visual Brain in Action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
42. Mishkin M., Ungerleider L.G. Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys. Behavioural Brain Research 1982, 6:57-77.
43. Moreaud O., Charnallet A., Pellat J. Identification without manipulation: A study of the relations between object use and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:1295-1301.
44. Noirhomme Q., Ferrant M., Vandermeeren Y., Olivier E., Macq B., Cuisenaire O. Registration and real-time visualization of transcranial magnetic stimulation with 3-D MR images. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2004, 51:1994-2005.
45. Noppeney U., Josephs O., Kiebel S., Friston K.J., Price C.J. Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research 2005, 25(3):641-649.
46. Noppeney U., Price C.J., Penny W.D., Friston K.J. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 16(3):437-445.
47. Ochipa C., Rothi L.J., Heilman K.M. Ideational apraxia: A deficit in tool selection and use. Annals of Neurology 1989, 25:190-193.
48. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
49. Peeters R., Simone L., Nelissen K., Fabbri-Destro M., Vanduffel W., Rizzolatti G., et al. The representation of tool use in humans and monkeys: Common and uniquely human features. Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:11523-11539.
50. Pelgrims B., Andres M., Olivier E. Double dissociation between motor and visual imagery in the posterior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 2009, 19:2298-2307.
51. Pelgrims B., Olivier E., Andres M. Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32:1802-1810.
52. Pillon A., d'Honincthun P. The organization of the conceptual system: The case of the "object versus action" dimension. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2010, 27(7):587-613.
53. Pillon A., d'Honincthun P. A common processing system for the concepts of artifacts and actions? Evidence from a case of a disproportionate conceptual impairment for living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2011, 28(1):1-43.
54. Rapcsak S.Z., Ochipa C., Anderson K.C., Poizner H. Progressive ideomotor apraxia: Evidence for a selective impairment of the action production system. Brain and Cognition 1995, 27:213-236.
55. Rosci C., Chiesa V., Laiacona M., Capitani E. Apraxia is not associated to a disproportionate naming impairment for manipulable objects. Brain and Cognition 2003, 53:412-415.
56. Rothi L.J.G., Ochipa C., Heilman K.M. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991, 8:443.
57. Rumiati R.I., Zanini S., Vorano L., Shallice T. A form of ideational apraxia as a delective deficit of contention scheduling. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2001, 18(7):617-642.
58. Sack A.T., Kohler A., Linden D.E., Goebel R., Muckli L. The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS. NeuroImage 2006, 29(4):1326-1335.
59. Schwartz M.F., Montgomery M.W., Buxbaum L.J., Lee S.S., Carew T.G., Coslett H.B., et al. Naturalistic action impairment in closed head injury. Neuropsychology 1998, 12(1):13-28.
60. Seurinck R., de Lange F.P., Erik Achten, Vingerhoets G. Mental rotation meets the motion aftereffect: The role of hV5/MT+ in visual mental imagery. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2011, 23:1395-1404.
61. Sirigu A., Cohen L., Duhamel J.R., Pillon B., Dubois B., Agid Y. A selective impairment of hand posture for object utilization in apraxia. Cortex 1995, 31(1):41-55.
62. Sirigu A., Duhamel J.R., Poncet M. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. Brain 1991, 114(6):2555-2573.
63. Sparing R., Buelte D., Meister I.G., Paus T., Fink G.R. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies. Human Brain Mapping 2008, 29(1):82-96.
64. Tranel D., Kemmerer D., Adolphs R., Damasio H., Damasio A.R. Neural correlates of conceptual knowledge for actions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2003, 20:409-432.
65. Turken AU and Dronkers NF. The neural architecture of the language comprehension network: Converging evidence from lesion and connectivity analyses. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 5(1): 1-20, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2011.00001.
66. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Analysis of Visual Behavior 1982, 549-586. MIT Press, Cambridge, Cambridge, MA. D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J.W. Mansfield (Eds.).
67. Valyear K.F., Culham J.C. Observing learned object-specific functional grasps preferentially activates the ventral stream. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2010, 22:970-984.
68. Vannuscorps G., Pillon A. A domain-specific system for representing knowledge of both man-made objects and human actions. Evidence from a case with an association of deficits. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49:2321-2341.
69. Vingerhoets G., Vandekerckhove E., Honoré P., Vandemaele P., Achten E. Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: Action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?. Human Brain Mapping 2011, 32:905-918.
70. Warrington E.K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 1984, 107(3):829-854.
71. de Zubicaray G.I., Rose S.E., McMahon K.L. The structure and connectivity of semantic memory in the healthy older adult brain. NeuroImage 2011, 54:1488-1494.