Acceptability of contingency management among clinicians and clients within a co-occurring mental health and substance use treatment program

American Journal on Addictions

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 432-436

  Srebnik, Debra ^a   Sugar, Andrea ^a   Coblentz, Patrick ^b   McDonell, Michael G ^a   Angelo, Frank ^a   Lowe, Jessica M ^a   Ries, Richard K ^a   Roll, John ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTINENCE; ARTICLE; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FUNDING; HUMAN; JOB EXPERIENCE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MOTIVATION; PATIENT COUNSELING; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REWARD; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84882632962     PISSN: 10550496     EISSN: 15210391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.00333.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bride BE, Abraham AJ, Roman PM., Diffusion of contingency management and attitudes regarding its effectiveness and acceptability. Subst Abuse. 2010; 31: 127-135.
2. Prendergast M, Podus D, Finney J, et al. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Addiction. 2006; 101: 1546-1560.
3. Lussier JP, Heil SH, Mongeon JA, et al. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorder. Addiction. 2006; 101: 192-203.
4. Petry NM, Peirce JM, Stitzer ML, et al. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: A national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005; 62: 1148-1156.
5. Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, et al. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; 165: 179-187.
6. Roll JM, Chermack ST, Chudzynski JE., Investigating the use of contingency management in the treatment of cocaine abuse among individuals with schizophrenia: A feasibility study. Psychiatry Res. 2004; 125: 61-64.
7. Sigmon SC, Higgins ST., Voucher-based contingent reinforcement of marijuana abstinence among individuals with serious mental illness. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006; 30: 291-295.
8. Ries RK, Dyck DG, Short R, et al. Outcomes of managing disability benefits among patients with substance dependence and severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2004; 55: 445-447.
9. McDonell MG, Srebnik D, Angelo F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of contingency management for psycho-stimulant use in community mental health outpatients with co-occurring severe mental illness. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170: 94-101.
10. Weinstock J, Alessi SM, Petry NM., Regardless of psychiatric severity the addition of contingency management to standard treatment improves retention and drug use outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 87: 288-296.
11. Kirby KC, Benishek LA, Dugosh KL, et al. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: Implications for dissemination. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 85: 19-27.
12. Ritter A, Cameron J., Australian clinician attitudes towards contingency management: Comparing down under with America. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007; 87: 312-315.
13. McCarty D, Fuller BE, Arfken C, et al. Direct care workers in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: Characteristics, opinions, and beliefs. Psychiatr Serv. 2007; 58: 181-190.
14. Ducharme LJ, Knudsen HK, Abraham AJ, et al. Counselor attitudes toward the use of motivational incentives in addiction treatment. Am J Addict. 2010; 19: 496-503.
15. Rash CJ, Petry NM, Kirby KC, et al. Identifying provider beliefs related to contingency management adoption using the contingency management beliefs questionnaire. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 121: 205-212.
16. Benishek LA, Kirby K, Dugosh KL., Beliefs about the empirical support of drug abuse teratment interventions: A survey of outpatient treament providers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 107: 202-208.
17. Henggeler SW, Chapman JE, Rowland MD, et al. Statewide adoption and initial implementation of contingency management for substance-abusing adolescents. J Consult Clin Psych. 2008; 76: 556-567.
18. Walker R, Rosvall T, Field CA, et al. Disseminating contingency management to increase attendance in two community substance abuse treatment centers: Lessons learned. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 39: 202-209.
19. Petry NM, Tedford J, Austin M, et al. Prize reinforcement contingency management for treating cocaine users: How low can we go, and with whom ? Addiction. 2004; 99: 349-360.
20. Silverman K, Chutuape MA, Bigelow GE, et al. Voucher-based reinforcement of attendance by unemployed methadone patients in a job skills training program. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996; 41: 197-207.
21. Stitzer M, Petry N., Contingency management for treatment of substance abuse. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006; 2: 411-434.
22. Elo S, Kyngas H., The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2007; 62: 107-115.
23. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
24. Silverman K, Wong CJ, Needham M, et al. A randomized trial of employment-based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in injection drug users. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007; 40: 387-410.
25. Sindelar J, Elbel B, Petry NM., What do we get for our money? Cost-effectiveness of adding contingency management. Addiction. 2007; 102: 309-316.