Identifying provider beliefs related to contingency management adoption using the contingency management beliefs questionnaire

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 205-212

  Rash, Carla J ^a   Petry, Nancy M ^a   Kirby, Kimberly C ^b   Martino, Steve ^c   Roll, John ^d   Stitzer, Maxine L ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER   (United States)

^b TREATMENT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adoption; Contingency management; Dissemination; Technology transfer; Treatment barriers

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONTINGENCY MANAGAMENT; CONTINGENCY MANAGEMENT BELIEF QUESTIONNAIRE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; JOB EXPERIENCE; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84857138871     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alessi S.M., Rash C.J., Petry N.M. Contingency management is efficacious and improves outcomes in cocaine patients with pretreatment marijuana use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011, 118:62-67.
2. Anderson W. The New York Needle Trial: the politics of public health in the age of AIDS. Am. J. Public Health 1991, 81:1506-1517.
3. Benishek L.A., Kirby K.C., Dugosh K.L., Padovano A. Beliefs about the empirical support of drug abuse treatment interventions: a survey of outpatient treatment providers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010, 107:202-208.
4. Browne M.W., Cudeck R. Alternate ways of assessing model fit. Sociol. Methods Res. 1992, 21:230-258.
5. Byrne S., Petry N.M. Concurrent alcohol dependence among methadone-maintained cocaine abusers is associated with greater abstinence. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2011, 19:116-122.
6. Cameron J., Ritter A. Contingency management: perspectives of Australian service providers. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007, 26:183-189.
7. Cattell R.B. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav. Res. 1966, 1:245-276.
8. Ducharme L.J., Knudsen H.K., Abraham A.J., Roman P.M. Counselor attitudes toward the use of motivational incentives in addiction treatment. Am. J. Addict. 2010, 19:496-503.
9. Ducharme L.J., Knudsen H.K., Roman P.M., Johnson J.A. Innovation adoption in substance abuse treatment: exposure, trialability, and the clinical trials network. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2007, 32:321-329.
10. Dutra L., Stathopoulou G., Basden S.L., Levro T.M., Powers M.B., Otto M.W. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. Am. J. Psychiatry 2008, 165:179-187.
11. Fabrigar L.R., Wegener D.T., MacCullum R.C., Strahan E.J. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol. Methods 1999, 4:272-299.
12. Ford J.D., Hawke J., Alessi S.M., Ledgerwood D., Petry N.M. Psychological trauma and PTSD symptoms as a predictor of substance dependence treatment outcomes. Behav. Res. Ther. 2007, 45:2417-2431.
13. Goddard P. Changing attitudes towards harm reduction among treatment profesionals: a report from the American midwest. Int. J. Drug Policy 2003, 14:257-260.
14. Henggeler S.W., Chapman J.E., Rowland M.D., Halliday-Boykins C.A., Randall J., Shackelford J., Schoenwald S.K. Statewide adoption and initial implementation of contingency management for substance abusing adolescents. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2008, 76:556-567.
15. Herbeck D.M., Hser Y.I., Teruya C. Empirically supported substance abuse treatment approaches: a survey of treatment providers' perspectives and practices. Addict. Behav. 2008, 33:699-712.
16. Horn J.L. A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1965, 30:179-185.
17. Hu L., Bentler P.M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 1999, 6:1-55.
18. Kellogg S.H., Burns M., Coleman P., Stitzer M.L., Wale J.B., Kreek M.J. Something of value: the introduction of contingency management interventions into the New York City Health and Hospital Addiction Treatment Service. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2005, 28:57-65.
19. Kirby K.C., Benishek L.A., Dugosh K.L., Kerwin M.L.E. Substance abuse treatment providers' beliefs and objections regarding contingency management: implications for dissemination. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006, 85:19-27.
20. Kirby, K.C., Carpenedo, C.M., Stitzer, M.L., Dugosh, K.L., Petry, N.M., Roll, J.M., Saladin, M.E., in press. Treatment providers' beliefs about contingency management: if they try it will they like it? J. Subst. Abuse Treat.
21. Lott D.C., Jencius S. Effectiveness of very low cost contingency management in a community adolescent treatment program. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009, 102:162-165.
22. Lussier J., Heil S., Mongeon J., Badger G., Higgins S.T. A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction 2006, 101:192-203.
23. McCarty D., Fuller B.E., Arfken C., Miller M., Nunes E.V., Copersino M., Floyd A., Forman R., Laws R., Magruder K.M., Oyama M., Sindelar J., Wendt W.W. Direct care workers in the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network: characteristics, opinions, and beliefs. Psychiatr. Serv. 2007, 58:181-190.
24. McGovern M.P., Fox T.S., Xie H., Drake R.E. A survey of clinical practices and readiness to adopt evidence-based practices: dissemination research in an additional treatment system. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2004, 26:305-312.
25. Miller W.R., Zweben J., Johnsen W.R. Evidence-based treatment: why, what, where, when, and how?. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2005, 29:267-276.
26. O'Connor B.P. SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 2000, 32:396-402.
27. Peirce J.M., Petry N.M., Stitzer M.L., Blaine J., Kellogg S., Satterfield F., Schwartz M., Krasnansky J., Pencer E., Silva-Vazquez L., Kirby K.C., Royer-Malvestuto C., Roll J.M., Cohen A., Copersino M.L., Kolodner K., Li R. Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2006, 63:201-208.
28. Petry N.M., Alessi S.M., Carroll K.M., Hanson T., MacKinnon S., Rounsaville B., Sierra S. Contingency management treatments: reinforcing abstinence versus adherence with goal-related activities. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2006, 74:592-601.
29. Petry N.M., Alessi S.M., Tedford J., Austin M., Tardif M. Vouchers versus prizes: contingency management for treatment of substance abusers in community settings. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2005, 73:1005-1114.
30. Petry N.M., Bohn M.J. Fishbowls and candy bars: using low-cost incentives to increase treatment retention. Sci. Pract. Action 2003, 2:55-61.
31. Petry N.M., Martin B., Cooney J.L., Kranzler H.R. Give them prizes and they will come: contingency management for the treatment of alcohol dependence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2000, 68:250-257.
32. Petry N.M., Peirce J.M., Stitzer M.L., Blaine J., Roll J., Cohen A., Obert J., Killeen T., Saladin M.E., Cowell M., Kirby K.C., Sterling R., Royer-Malvestuto C., Hamilton J., Booth R.E., Macdonald M., Liebert M., Rader L., Burns R., DiMaria J., Copersino M., Stabile P.Q., Kolodner K., Li R. Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2005, 62:1148-1156.
33. Petry N.M., Tedford J., Austin M., Nich C., Carroll K.M., Rounsaville B.J. Prize reinforcement contingency management for treatment of cocaine abusers: how low can we go, and with whom?. Addiction 2004, 99:349-360.
34. Prendergast M., Podus D., Finney J., Greenwell L., Roll J. Contingency management for treatment of substance use disorders: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2006, 101:1546-1560.
35. Rash C.J., Alessi S.M., Petry N.M. Cocaine users with and without comorbid alcohol dependence respond equally well to contingency management treatments. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16:275-281.
36. Rash C.J., Alessi S.M., Petry N.M. Contingency management is efficacious for cocaine abusers with prior treatment attempts. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 2008, 16:547-554.
37. Ritter A., Cameron J. Australian clinician attitudes towards contingency management: comparing down under with America. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 87:312-315.
38. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict. Behav. 2002, 27:989-993.
39. Roll J.M., Madden G.J., Rawson R., Petry N.M. Facilitating the adoption of contingency management for the treatment of substance use disorders. Behav. Anal. Pract. 2009, 2:4-13.
40. Roman P.M., Abraham A.J., Rothrauff T.C., Knudsen H.K. A longitudinal study of organizational formation, innovation adoption, and dissemination activities within the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2010, 38:S44-S52.
41. Roman P.M., Johnson J.A. National Treatment Center Study Summary Report: Public Treatment Centers 2004, Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
42. Salmon A.M., Thein H.-H., Kimber J., Kaldor J.M., Maher L. Five years on: what are the community perceptions of drug-related public amenity following the establishment of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre?. Int. J. Drug Policy 2007, 18:46-53.
43. Satorra A., Bentler P.M. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika 2001, 66:507-514.
44. Simpson D.D. A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2002, 22:171-182.
45. Tabachnick B.G., Fidell L.S. Using Multivariate Statistics 2001, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA. 4th edition.
46. Thein H.-H., Kimber J., Maher L., MacDonald M., Kaldor J. Public opinion towards supervised injecting centres and the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Int. J. Drug Policy 2005, 16:275-280.
47. Velicer W.F. Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 1976, 41:321-327.
48. Weinstock J., Alessi S.M., Petry N.M. Regardless of psychiatric severity the addition of contingency management to standard treatment improves retention and drug use outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 87:288-296.
49. Willenbring M.L., Kivlahan D., Kenny M., Grillo M., Hagedorn H., Postier A. Beliefs about evidence-based practices in addiction treatment: a survey of Veterans administration program leaders. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2004, 26:79-85.